Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
License needed for work use Register

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


Preserving The Integrity Of Te Tiriti: Why A Referendum Is Not The Solution

In a bold move, David Seymour of the Act Party has called for a referendum on the Principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, specifically Partnership, Participation, and Protection as defined by the New Zealand Courts and The Treaty of Waitangi Tribunal. While democratic engagement is a cornerstone of any functioning society, there are critical reasons why such a referendum could have far-reaching and detrimental consequences.

First and foremost, a referendum to remove the definition of the principles of Te Tiriti would undermine the credibility of the New Zealand Court System and the very essence of Case Law. Case Law serves as the bedrock of legal interpretation and application in our society. It is the accumulation of centuries of jurisprudential wisdom that ensures fair and consistent treatment under the law. To tamper with this foundation risks opening a Pandora's box of legal disputes and demands for redefinition in the future.

It is important to remember that Māori constitute only 16% of New Zealand's population. This means that in a referendum, they would be outnumbered, potentially resulting in decisions that may not necessarily align with their interests. It is unjust to use a majority vote to potentially strip away the rights and protections that Te Tiriti affords them. Not all Māori share the same perspectives on the matter, but a unilateral decision through a referendum could set Māoridom back by decades, exacerbating existing inequities that the community already faces.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Moreover, if we trust the courts to interpret and apply legislation on a daily basis, then it stands to reason that the government should not interfere with the workings of the Waitangi Tribunal and the Courts when it comes to decisions related to Te Tiriti. The appointment of judges is a process designed to ensure impartiality and expertise. To undermine this process by intervening in their decisions would erode the very trust that our legal system relies upon.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On How Climate Change Threatens Cricket‘s Future

Well that didn’t last long, did it? Mere days after taking on what he called the “awesome responsibility” of being Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon has started blaming everyone else and complaining that he's inherited “economic vandalism on an unprecedented scale” - which is how most of us would describe his own coalition agreements, 100-Day Plan, and backdated $3 billion handout to landlords... More

Public Housing Futures: Christmas Comes Early For Landlords

New CTU analysis of the National & ACT coalition agreement has shown the cost of returning interest deductibility to landlords is an extra $900M on top of National’s original proposal. This is because it is going to be implemented earlier and faster, including retrospective rebates from April 2023. More

Green Party: Petition To Save Oil & Gas Ban

“The new Government’s plan to expand oil and gas exploration is as dangerous as it is unscientific. Whatever you think about the new government, there is simply no mandate to trash the climate. We need to come together to stop them,” says James Shaw. More

PSA: MFAT Must Reverse Decision To Remove Te Reo

MFAT's decision to remove te reo from correspondence before new Ministers are sworn in risks undermining the important progress the public sector has made in honouring te Tiriti. "We are very disappointed in what is a backward decision - it simply seems to be a Ministry bowing to the racist rhetoric we heard on the election campaign trail," says Marcia Puru. More




InfoPages News Channels


Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.