The New Zealand Outdoors and Freedom party are outraged by the ongoing harm caused to communities, beaches and economy by pine forestry. Nothing has changed since the massive devastation in the East Cape and Tasman flood events several years ago. This time it’s stunning Kaiteriteri Beach that has borne the brunt of destructive logging practices and yet again while private forestry companies profit, they expect ratepayers to pay for their mess.

The public made it clear they wanted to end the  shocking and predictable pollution from slash and waste logs, putting lives and property at risk, and clogging beaches  after each significant rainstorm.

'The RMA and councils are failing the public. It's time for a more careful public focused response." says NZ Outdoors and Freedom Party leader and lawyer Sue Grey. "The common law makes individuals strictly responsible for the consequences of activities on their properties. Every lawyer learns about Rylands v Fletcher and strict liability for harm. Why are councils not holding logging companies responsible under these principles? Why are the public being expected to pay time and time again for the clean ups? How can it be in the public interest for private companies to take the benefits of logging but the public to pay the costs?"

The cost to the taxpayer of cleaning some of the beaches in the Gisborne area resulted in a public outcry.  As a result we all thought that might have been the end of the problem. The forestry companies promised that they would amend their harvesting practices. 

"Of course it was all posture and hollow words to keep the public quiet" says Alan Simmons of the NZ Outdoors and Freedom Party, who published a report after the East Coast floods.  "The same can be said for the Government response which again was nothing but platitudes.”

Take one look at the Tasman District after this latest huge rain event and you wonder why anyone ever wasted breath or ink on their promises.

One of regions favourite beaches , Kaiteriteri Beach, has been left in an appalling state, covered in pine forest logs and waste. Sue Grey leader of the Outdoors & Freedom Party and Nelson Resident is angry about the damage done to this beautiful beach and by the lack of respect for the law by the forestry industry and local council.

Sue Grey wants to know "Why forestry companies are not automatically required to pay for the cleanup and also the economic costs to the local business".  She said "These costs should not fall on the ratepayer. The community is tired of the continuous excuses, the never ending slippery answers and the hollow promises they will ""voluntarily amend practices"", to avoid further harm and cost to the environment and local communities.”

“A decision  by the House of Lords in 1868 developed English tort law establishing the rule of Rylands v Fletcher that everyone is strictly liable for harm caused by non-natural use of their land. It's now approaching 200 years since that rule was developed. Why are we still waiting for it to be applied in New Zealand?” asks Party leader Sue Grey 

“If you seek to make the profit from growing the pine trees, then you must pay the costs for the consequences."

© Scoop Media