NZ Agriculture Threatened by GE Animal Fodder
NZ Agriculture Threatened by GE Animal Fodder

The threat to New Zealand from the introduction of genetically engineered (GE) fodder crops is both economic and environmental, and demands the government intervenes to prevent it. Directly or indirectly our whole economy benefits from the protection of Brand New Zealand.
“It would be insane to permit
the introduction of GE fodder crops to our agricultural
system. Farmers and consumers at home and overseas are
seeking a safe sustainable food supply and a guarantee they
can buy GE Free produce.” said Claire Bleakley President
of GE Free NZ in food and environment.
But without
legislation to prohibit GE fodder crops, the government is
leaving New Zealand at risk from lost exports, damage to our
tourism image and damage to our agricultural industries from
GE contamination and novel disease (1).
GM
fodder crops can have no place in a country with an economy
reliant on quality perceptions of our food system. A field
trial of GE brassica was recently shut down after Crop /
Plant and Food allowed plants to flower, but the GE fodder
kale had also developed a stem rot disease not identified
[1].
Beyond the Biosecurity threat, New Zealand's
agricultural sector must not be undermined by the increased
toxicity of GM fodder crops (2, 3, 4) that absorb higher
quantities of Round-Up; or by animal sickness from GE feed
containing insecticidal proteins; or by the extreme
deformities and animal cruelty associated with GE technology
and cloning.
“New Zealand research data on
GM-animal survival rates indicates a more serious animal
welfare issue far greater than chicken and pig husbandry
which recently hit the headlines” said Ms Bleakley
“Looking at traditional, transgenic and cloned animals, GE
fodder crops pose the ability to create further serious
problems in all types of animals and must not be grown”.
The Prime Minster and Government must take up the
protection of the New Zealand Brand as their highest
priority, and urgently develop a Biotechnology strategy (5)
that addresses the billion-dollar conflict between our
national identity and GE biotechnology that benefits
consumers, farmers and our economy.
ENDS