Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Search

 

Cablegate: Peru's Ipr Negotiator Resigns, but Then Stays On

This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 LIMA 001092

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR WHA/AND, EB/IPE SWILSON
COMMERCE FOR 4331/MAC/WH/MCAMERON
USTR FOR BHARMAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON PGOV PE FTA
SUBJECT: PERU'S IPR NEGOTIATOR RESIGNS, BUT THEN STAYS ON


1. (SBU) Summary. Infighting between the Ministry of Trade
(Mincetur) and Indecopi (Peru's IPR administrative agency)
over Peru's intellectual property rights position in the FTA
negotiations has become increasingly heated. Following the
resignation of Peru's lead IPR negotiator and Indecopi
employee, Luis Alonso Garcia, both institutions have gone
public to air their differences. In an effort to quell the
rift, Prime Minister Carlos Ferrero decided that Garcia
should remain the lead IPR negotiator, but would follow
Indecopi's direction. While the situation appears resolved
for the moment, internal debates over the data exclusivity
protection issue will likely require President Toledo's
intervention. End Summary.

Mincetur and Indecopi at Loggerheads
------------------------------------

2. (SBU) For months, Mincetur and Indecopi officials have
disagreed privately on Peru's IPR policy during the FTA
negotiations. Notably, Indecopi is against providing data
exclusivity protection for pharmaceutical and agrochemical
products. Before the Cartagena FTA round, Indecopi had
prepared a document that it had intended to publish;
Mincetur successfully quashed the report by convincing
President Toledo to intercede. In recent days, both
Indecopi President Santiago Roca and Trade Minister Alfredo
Ferrero have gone public with their differences.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Lead Negotiator Resigns...
--------------------------

3. (U) In mid-February, Indecopi privately informed Mincetur
that it did not support Mincetur's views on IPR issues and
was withdrawing support from its IPR negotiator in the FTA
negotiations. On February 19, Luis Alonso Garcia, Peru's
lead IPR negotiator and Indecopi employee, resigned in
protest of Indecopi's actions. According to a Pharma
contact, Garcia (who supports the Mincetur view) did not
want to be criticized later as the GOP representative who
"lost" the data exclusivity issue. Garcia, he said, seeks
GOP political support.

...But is Reinstated
--------------------

4. (SBU) Prime Minister Carlos Ferrero met with Chief FTA
Negotiator Pablo De la Flor and Santiago Roca for two hours
on February 22 to discuss Garcia's resignation. The Prime
Minister decided that Garcia would stay on as lead
negotiator but take direction from Indecopi. If Mincetur
wants Indecopi to modify Peru's IPR policy, Mincetur must
formally notify Indecopi and assume responsibility.
Mincetur is not satisfied with the Prime Minister's
decision. De la Flor told us that he believes this
arrangement is untenable, as Indecopi (and thus the lead IPR
negotiator) would not accept Mincetur direction. Roca told
us that it would be better if Mincetur hired Garcia
outright, but indicated that Mincetur was not ready to take
that step.

IPR Chief Rocking the Boat
--------------------------

5. (SBU) Indecopi President Santiago Roca (who holds a PhD
in economics from Cornell) told EconCouns on February 24
that Peru needed to increase its technological capabilities,
and that the FTA should be the vehicle to reach that
objective. Roca said that that the FTA and IPR chapter
should help foster the development of new technology in
Peru. EconCouns noted that science and technology
cooperation is under consideration, but ultimately it is the
private sector with new investment that advances a country's
technology. Roca suggested that a separate IPR, science,
and technology agreement, not part of the FTA, would be more
beneficial for Peru.

6. (SBU) While claiming he supports the FTA, Roca stated
that Peru is not at the same level as the United States on
intellectual property issues, and thus should not commit to
long-term protection for American products without something
in return. Extending data exclusivity for American
products, he argued, would largely benefit the United
States, not Peru.

Mincetur: This Guy is Bad News
------------------------------

7. (SBU) Mincetur officials, on the other hand, privately
recognize that Peru needs to provide data exclusivity
protections. Pablo de la Flor, Peru's lead FTA negotiator,
told EconCouns on February 23 that Peru would move closer to
the U.S. IPR position, but advised that the recent spat has
made his job more difficult. He noted that Peru did not
back Colombia and Ecuador's proposal in Cartagena for a
three-year period of data exclusivity because of
difficulties with Indecopi, which does not support the idea.

8. (SBU) De la Flor noted that several months ago Santiago
Roca had sent President Toledo a letter recommending that
the IPR chapter be dropped from the FTA negotiations. The
Vice Minister never saw the letter, but he visited Roca when
he heard about it. De la Flor described Roca as ill
informed on IP issues and surrounded by advisors who do not
believe in pharmaceutical patent protection. A series of
four increasingly nasty letters between Trade Minister
Ferrero and the Indecopi President followed.

9. (SBU) De la Flor finds puzzling Indecopi's sudden change
of heart 10 months into the FTA negotiations, noting that
Indecopi appointed Garcia as the lead IPR negotiator for
Peru prior to the start of the FTA negotiations. De la Flor
did not see a solution to the problem, and the departure of
Roca from Indecopi is unlikely since he is a close friend of
President Toledo.

Private Sector Critical of Indecopi Chief
-----------------------------------------

10. (SBU) Members of the private sector lament the public
squabbling and are concerned that the Mincetur-Indecopi
dispute could undermine general support for the FTA, which
enjoys more than 70 percent approval in recent public
opinion polls. The Indecopi President has been criticized
for raising his differences so close to the end of the FTA
negotiations. Others have called for President Toledo to
get more involved in the FTA process. One Pharma rep told
us that the debate is not about substance, but rather a
dispute between strong personalities who do not want to be
perceived publicly as having caved to U.S. pressure on IPR.

Comment: Toledo Needs to Weigh In
---------------------------------

11. (SBU) The sensitive data exclusivity issue has become a
political matter that President Toledo will probably have to
resolve. Neither Mincetur nor Indecopi wants to be held
responsible for having agreed to data exclusivity
protection, a U.S. priority, for fear of political
criticism. Meanwhile, Mincetur is seeking a meeting with
the President to brief him on the FTA negotiations and to
get him more involved in the decision-making process.

STRUBLE

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.