Cablegate: Executive Interference and Reprisals Undermine
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
080729Z Apr 05
ACTION AF-00
INFO LOG-00 NP-00 AID-00 CIAE-00 INL-00 DODE-00 EAP-00
EUR-00 OIGO-00 UTED-00 VC-00 TEDE-00 INR-00 L-00
VCE-00 AC-00 NEA-00 NSAE-00 NSCE-00 OMB-00 PA-00
MCC-00 PM-00 GIWI-00 PRS-00 ACE-00 P-00 SP-00
IRM-00 TRSE-00 FMP-00 IIP-00 SCRS-00 PMB-00 PRM-00
DRL-00 G-00 NFAT-00 SAS-00 SWCI-00 /000W
------------------DA9F12 080826Z /38
FM AMEMBASSY NDJAMENA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 1330
INFO AMEMBASSY ABUJA
AMEMBASSY YAOUNDE
AMEMBASSY NIAMEY
AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
AMEMBASSY ACCRA
AMEMBASSY LONDON
AMEMBASSY PARIS
UNCLAS NDJAMENA 000559
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR AF/C, DRL AND AF/PD - DON WITHMAN
STATE PASS USAID/DCHA
LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS
ACCRA FOR USAID/WARP
E.O. 12958: DECL: N/A
TAGS: KDEM EAID CD LY PJUS
SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE INTERFERENCE AND REPRISALS UNDERMINE
CHAD'S JUSTICE SECTOR
1. (U) Summary: In an apparent act of reprisal for their
refusal to hand down the ruling favored by the Executive
branch in a long-disputed property sale case, the Minister
of Justice has demoted and reassigned the three Appeals
Court justices involved in the case. The Union of
Magistrates, the Chadian Bar Association, and the National
Union of Clerks of the Court closed the courts with a three-
day protest strike. A group of senior magistrates and
attorneys told us they saw this as the latest in a series of
actions further weakening Chadian justice. They made some
concrete recommendations for donor support to strengthen the
justice sector. End Summary.
2. (SBU) On March 29 a focus group of experienced Chadian
judges, attorneys, and court officers met for lunch at the
DCM's residence to discuss recent patterns of interference
in the independence of Chad's judiciary.
A MINISTER'S LETTER TRUMPS AN APPEALS COURT RULING
--------------------------------------------- -----
3. (SBU) In apparent disregard of a March 4 Appeals Court
ruling that resolved a long-disputed real estate sale
(Lafico vs. Yacoub) in favor of the Chadian buyer of the
building, the Minister of Justice directed that police evict
the buyer from the property. The Minister had earlier tried
to influence the Appeals Court to impose wildly inflated
damages and interest on the buyer, in order to place him
under financial pressure to cede the building to the Libyan
foreign investment firm that lost the case, according to the
Chadian Union of Magistrates. The President of the Appeals
Court told us he refused the Minister's urging as improper.
In what appears to be a reprisal, a Ministerial Decree dated
March 11 ordered the President of the Appeals Court demoted
by two grades, and reassigned to the provinces the two
experienced Appeals Court judges who advised him in the
case. The Appeals Court Procurer General who signed the
March 7 order instructing the Police and Internal Security
to proceed with the eviction has now been named as the new
President of the Appeals court, according to GOC-influenced
daily newspaper Le Progrs.
4. (U) The recently reassigned President of the Appeals
Court, who has participated in the Embassy's Justice focus
group for the past two years, described the Minster's
actions as "without precedent in the history of the Chadian
Judiciary." The Union of Magistrates met in plenary and
declared a three-day protest strike March 22-24. The
Chadian Bar and the National Union of Clerks of the Court
joined the judges, effectively closing the courts for the
duration of the strike.
THE "HOLLOWING OUT" OF CHAD'S JUDICIARY
---------------------------------------
5. (U) The focus group viewed the Minister of Justice's
recent actions as part of a pattern of Executive Branch
interference meant to weaken and corrupt the Justice sector.
In early 2004, for example, President Deby replaced via an
unconstitutional Presidential Decree a sitting Supreme Court
justice, Ahmed Bartchiret. Since that time, the group said,
the President had progressively replaced seasoned judges
with selected recent graduates of the Ecole Nationale de
l'Administration et de la Magistrature (ENAM - Chad's
training facility for civil servants and the judiciary).
These new judges had no courtroom or other legal experience,
but they were reliable proponents of the ruling MPS party's
political views, and were "pliable". Nominations to high
positions in the judicial system no longer followed the
rules, according to the focus group.
6. (U) The normal course of a junior magistrate's career
begins at the lower court, then an assignment in the court
of appeals, and finally, for the best judges, an assignment
to the Supreme Court. Nowadays it is common to see young
ENAM graduates appointed immediately as judges to the
Supreme Court. The day-to-day functioning of courts
throughout the country has been impeded by these junior
judges' lack of appropriate experience and background for
their positions. Many of the "new breed" have made little
effort to improve on their scanty knowledge, apparently
believing that their political reliability guarantees them
appointment to even higher positions regardless of their
professional capabilities. The group agreed that the new
judges were characterized by a desire to get rich quickly
and an unapologetic willingness to accept bribes. Their
increasingly brash presence was felt to constitute a danger
to the legal profession in Chad.
AN OPEN DOOR TO CORRUPTION
--------------------------
7. (U) Lack of minimally adequate and regularly paid
salaries remained "a door wide open to corruption", the
group said. As of the end of March, the Chadian Government
was two to three months in arrears on salaries to employees
of the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary. With the
exception of those whose amenability to bribes allows them
to buy well-appointed houses and cars, magistrates have
moved to the insecure city outskirts in search of cheaper
housing, and most come to work on shared-ride motorcycle
taxis. This increases the vulnerability of judges and their
families to neighborhood violence and the retribution of
those they convict or who are disadvantaged by their
rulings.
8. (U) The Union of Chadian Magistrates is the only non-
Government professional organization representing judges in
Chad. The Union's resources are severely limited, since
members' low salaries make membership dues a hardship. The
Union's President told the group he could barely keep the
office operating, and is frequently without such basic
supplies as pens and paper.
BUILDING UP THE JUDICIARY
-------------------------
9. (U) Asked what kind of donor activities might make a
difference in this situation, the group admitted that at
least some of the new judges not only have the potential to
become good judges but are also interested in improving.
Such people need regular in-service training, and the basic
wherewithal to do the job. The focus group felt that the
problem of "junior" magistrates assigned to posts for which
they are not qualified would remain as long as the MPS was
in power. "That means we need to make the best of these
people," said one judge. "For better or worse, these are
the people who will progressively replace the aging
generation of magistrates, regardless of who runs Chad."
10. (U) The group suggested concrete ways the U.S. or other
donors could help to reinforce the justice sector:
--Many courts lack the most basic legal reference documents
including a copy of the Chadian Code. This leads them to
make improper decisions from ignorance or misunderstanding.
--Judges do not presently have access to a widely accepted
manual of procedure. The presently out-of-print "Chadian
Judiciary Manual" should be updated, published, and widely
distributed by the Union of Magistrates or other competent
group. The few copies that still exist of this outdated
reference are widely circulated among judges as the only
available "cookbook" reference to Chadian judicial
procedure.
--New magistrates need specific "in-service training" to
develop and maintain skills. The Focus Group agreed to
provide a list of specific types of training that would be
most beneficial.
COMMENT
-------
11. (SBU) With regard to the disputed Appeals Court case,
one opposition paper implied that the Minister of Justice
was acting under Executive Branch pressure to resolve the
million-dollar LAFICO case in favor of the defendant, the
Libyan Finance Company. It quoted a memo from the Minister
of Justice to the Director of Internal Security as saying
that the decision in the case "endangers the interests of
the Chadian state." The press report says that in 2003,
then-Minister of Finance Idriss Ahmed Idriss wrote to the
Minister of Justice that the Chadian state would reimburse
LAFICO's more than USD 600,000 losses "in view of specific
bilateral relations between Chad and Libya." Although press
reports on the LAFICO case avoid mentioning the Presidency
by name, instructions to the Ministers of Justice and
Finance involving hundreds of thousands of dollars could
come only from President Deby. The Appeals Court decision
in the LAFICO case is evidence that, in the face of
discouraging political conditions, many Chadian judges are
still trying to act professionally. We were pleased to be
able to tell the group that a 2005 ESF project will provide
a manual typewriter and a copy of the basic Chadian legal
reference documents to every court, and that a small amount
of funding was available for in-service or other training.
Post will review the focus group's suggestions for possible
consideration under PD Speaker or other USG assistance
programming.
NNNN