Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Search

 

Cablegate: France's May 29 Referendum On Eu Constitution: The

This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 002942

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT ALSO FOR EUR/WE, EUR/ERA, EUR/PPD, DRL/IL AND INR/EUR
AND EB
DEPT OF LABOR FOR ILAB
DEPT OF COMMERCE FOR ITA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ELAB EU FR PINR SOCI ECON
SUBJECT: FRANCE'S MAY 29 REFERENDUM ON EU CONSTITUTION: THE
"SOCIAL" VS. THE "LIBERAL" IN THE REFERENDUM DEBATE

REF: A. (A) PARIS 2863
B. (B) PARIS 2825
C. (C) PARIS 2663
D. (D) BRUSSELS 1556
E. (E) PARIS 2604
F. (F) PARIS 2516 AND PREVIOUS

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED -- PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY

SUMMARY
-------
1. (SBU) Despite urgings from Jacques Chirac and most of
France's mainstream political leaders to cast ballots on the
EU Constitution's merits in the May 29 referendum, many
French voters remain focused on unemployment and other
pressing economic and social issues (reftel B). Diminished
purchasing power, urban tensions and insecurity, job flight,
lack of opportunity, and fraying social services
infrastructure are issues much closer to most French voters
than EU institutional issues addressed in the constitution.
Many blame an expanded Europe, driven by "liberal" (open
society/free market) ideas that is in turn part of a global,
competitive economy as threatening France's control over its
national destiny and its much vaunted social model, to which
many in France remain deeply attached. For these voters a
'no' to the EU Constitution May 29 is a vote to protect a
French way of life that many feel is under siege. END
SUMMARY.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

FOCUSED ON DOMESTIC CONCERNS
-----------------------------
2. (SBU) Since March 18, 22 polls in a row have shown that
among voters who say they have decided how they will vote, a
majority say they plan to vote 'no' in France's May 29
referendum on the proposed EU constitution. Many of these
ordinary Frenchmen and women are uncertain and apprehensive.
They are focused on their ever more straitened economic
prospects and declining quality of life. They are worried
that the constitution and an enlarged Europe will make things
worse for them, specifically, by imposing a "liberal"
dismantlement of the "French social model" (welfare state)
that they look to for maintaining their well-being.
President Chirac (see reftel A for his latest effort in
tandem with Chancellor Schroeder) and the rest of France's
pro-'yes' establishment have so far made little headway in
convincing these voters, particularly those whose political
sympathies are left-of-center, that the proposed constitution
protects the French social model rather than undermines it.

CONVERGENCE OF THE YES ARGUMENTS
---------------------------------
3. (SBU) The different 'yes' camps have recognized that
reassuring ordinary voters that France's system of
state-provided services is safe under the proposed
constitution is key to turning the electorate's attention
away from domestic worries. Supporters of the proposed
constitution are confident that, if voters can be brought to
focus on the merits of the proposed charter, some of the
French public's traditional support for Europe will re-assert
itself. Through the first month of the referendum debate
(reftel F) (beginning March 4 when President Chirac announced
the May 29 date for the referendum), the leaders of France's
three centrist political currents emphasized different
reasons for voting 'yes,' and stressed their differences over
how best to tackle the very same social and economic problems
that are besetting ordinary citizens. This
domestic-political-bickering-as-usual added to voters'
dismissal of the political class and fueled in part the
rising tide of 'no' (reftel C).

4. (SBU) Following a TV appearance by President Chirac April
14 (reftel E) that laid bare voters' domestic concerns and
their suspicion of the constitution's liberal bias,
spokespersons for all the 'yes' camps in TV appearances and
press interviews began highlighting the proposed
constitution's "social" dimension and its provisions for
protecting "states rights" in maintaining social and public
services. In sum, all who advocate 'yes', whether of left or
right, are now stressing the "social" in the "social, market
economy" (an operative phrase that appears a number of times
in the proposed constitution). Those who advocate 'no,' are
stressing the "market" -- alleging that the "ultra-liberal"
constitution would leave France helpless in a huge, formless
and "savagely capitalist" Europe, unable to maintain the
social services and safety-nets that French citizens have
long considered rights to be protected.

COMMENT: TWO CONTENDING THEORIES
--------------------------------
5. (SBU) Among the chattering classes in Paris, two leading
theories are making the rounds, both purporting to explain
the significance of the confrontation between 'yes' and 'no'
among the French: "biting the bullet of Thatcherism" and
"re-run of April 21."

6. (SBU) For proponents of the first, the choice facing the
French on May 29 really is between a "social" versus a
"liberal" socio-economic model, between a
no-longer-affordable "European social model" and a gentler
version of the "Anglo-Saxon economic model." Proponents of
this theory stress that the proposed constitution does,
overall, indeed enshrine liberal principles -- and that is
precisely why so many French people are against it.
According to this view, in an expanded Europe dominated by
"post-Thatcher countries" (UK, Spain, the Nordics, and the
states that had been under Soviet domination) France remains
a "pre-Thatcher country" (along with Germany and Italy), and
voting 'yes' to the proposed constitution signifies assenting
to a deep shift in social and economic model for France.
Voting 'no,' on the other hand, signifies defending a complex
set of habits deeply ingrained in French society, which are
in fact incompatible with "biting the bullet" of necessary
reform. The deep split on the French center-left is seen as
between those who recognize the necessity of this shift (and
believe social solidarity can be defended from within an
open, competitive economy), and those who don't.

7. (SBU) On April 21, 2002, in the first round of France's
most recent presidential election, well over half the voters
stayed home, cast blank ballots or voted for marginal,
"protest" candidates. Those who see the referendum as
shaping up into a "re-run of April 21", see in this voting
pattern evidence of massive alienation and disaffection among
the majority of the electorate. In this view, well over half
the voters cast votes "against the system" on April 21, and
could well do so again on May 29. For proponents of this
theory, 'yes' versus 'no' reveals the deep gulf between the
empowered and the disempowered, those who feel represented
and those who do not feel represented in France's political
system. This "crisis of representation" in France's
democracy, according to this theory's proponents, could well
doom a constitution that, it is generally agreed, would bring
more democracy to Europe's governing institutions (reftel D,
para 13). END COMMENT.

ROSENBLATT

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines