Cablegate: Burma/Tip: Muted Reaction to the 2006 Tip Report
VZCZCXRO5913
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHGO #0843 1721041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 211041Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY RANGOON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4706
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0954
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3387
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0792
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 0794
RUDKIA/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 0475
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2726
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0369
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
UNCLAS RANGOON 000843
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/MLS; PACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KCRM KWMN PGOV PHUM PREL BM
SUBJECT: BURMA/TIP: MUTED REACTION TO THE 2006 TIP REPORT
REF: RANGOON 0772
1. (SBU) Summary: The GOB officially reacted to the 2006
Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report through a critique in the
state press June 20. Although it was given front-page
attention, regime criticism of the Tier 3 ranking was
restrained, reflecting the SPDC's expectation to retain Tier
3 rankings, its satisfaction over modest progress
acknowledged in the Report, and a growing recognition that
rampant, unaddressed incidents of forced labor underpin
Burma's Tier 3 ranking. GOB efforts to address transnational
trafficking are unaffected by the negative TIP Report
ranking, but progress in addressing forced labor remains
unrealized. End Summary.
2. (U) The GOB responded to the June 5 release of the TIP
report via press release in a front-page article in the
government's June 20 "New Light of Myanmar." The lead,
promising development and a better future, is followed by a
more specific sub-title stating that the GOB "will also
continue to exert utmost endeavors to combat trafficking in
persons." The release expresses regret over Burma's
placement on the TIP Report's list of Tier 3 countries and
rejects the economic sanctions that accompany Tier 3 as
"unjust unilateral measures." As it did last year, the GOB
claims the TIP Report's narrative on Burma is contradictory.
The article quotes selectively from the report, highlighting
metion of its modest, positive steps taken with regard to
prosecution of traffickers, protection of trafficking
victims, and prevention of new incidents of trafficking. The
article concludes with the defiant exclamation that the SPDC
will continue "to exert utmost endeavors" to fight
trafficking in persons despite negative reports that "blindly
refuse" to acknowledge its ongoing efforts to deal with the
problem.
3. (SBU) In a June 20 meeting, Nikolas Win Myint, project
advisor at the UN Inter-Agency Project on Human Trafficking
in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (UNIAP), noted that he has
not yet received any direct reaction from key GOB anti-TIP
interlocutors. He attributed this to the officials' move to
Pyinmana and his view of their greater reluctance to meet
with international organizations' expatriate staff. Drawing
on past discussions with the government, Win Myint claimed
that GOB officials, such as Col. Sit Aye fully understand the
USG's definition of TIP and its inclusion of forced labor and
child soldiering as forms of trafficking. They also perceive
a "political element" to the Report and do not expect Burma
to be taken off of Tier 3 anytime soon.
4. (SBU) Win Myint opined that an official with
anti-trafficking expertise wrote the GOB's measured critique.
Accepting a Tier 3 ranking as a given each year, officials
working on TIP here may find solace in the Report's few
citations that show some progress addressing transnational
trafficking, he said. Win Myint recalled a statement made by
a senior police official at a March 2006 national seminar in
Rangoon; the official called on participants to ignore the
perennial Tier 3 ranking and instead to work for improved
anti-trafficking efforts motivated by self-determination.
5. (SBU) Comment: As usual, the only GOB response to the USG
statement came through the media. The subdued tone of the
reaction appears to reflect an acknowledgment that Burma will
remain on Tier 3 as long as the widespread forced labor
crimes remain unaddressed. Although some in the GOB appear
sincere in their efforts to address cross border trafficking,
they have no role to address forced labor crimes, committed
largely by regime authorities and the military. The GOB's
limited commitment to fight trafficking may be born not out
of human rights concerns, but rather out of concern over the
damage to "the pride and pedigree of Myanmar nationality that
should be valued and safeguarded by Myanmar race (sic)," as
stated in the preamble to the country's new anti-trafficking
law.
STOLTZ