Cablegate: Media Reaction Report - Lebanon - International Force -
null
Lucia A Keegan 08/21/2006 10:12:06 AM From DB/Inbox: Lucia A Keegan
Cable
Text:
UNCLAS PARIS 05574
SIPDIS
cxparis:
ACTION: PAO
INFO: DCM POL AMB ARS
DISSEMINATION: PAOX
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: PRS: LPLATT
DRAFTED: PR: FTHOMAS
CLEARED: NONE
VZCZCFRI587
OO RUEHC RUEAIIA RUEATRS RHEFDIA RUEKJCS RHEHAAA
RUCPDOC RUEHRL RUEHRO RUEHMO RUEHNO RUEHVEN RHMFIUU
DE RUEHFR #5574/01 2301155
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 181155Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0484
INFO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC//ASD/ISA//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 6283
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 7913
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5546
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 3597
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 3139
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 005574
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU;
AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC;
PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR
ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA;
ROME/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR FR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - Lebanon - International Force -
France's Conditions U.S. Policy in the Middle East - Secretary Rice
in Command
PARIS - Friday, August 18, 2006
(A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT:
Lebanon - International Force - France's Conditions
U.S. Policy in the Middle East - Secretary Rice in Command
B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE:
Reporting from Washington in Le Figaro, Guillemette Faure writes in
an article entitled "G.W. Bush Delegates the Middle East to
Condoleezza Rice" that "the Secretary of State, who is more
appreciated abroad than the President, implements his policy
faithfully." (See Part C)
France's "conditions and reluctance" regarding its participation in
the UNIFIL are today's lead international stories. For Le Figaro,
"France Sets Its Conditions" while for Liberation "France Is
Reluctant." The editorial in Le Figaro is entitled "France on the
Front Lines" and characterizes France's mission as "highly
dangerous" while Liberation's editorial entitled "Resistances"
claims that "Chirac's sending 200 additional soldiers as scouts is
akin to "diplomatically flipping the bird" to Kofi Annan." (See Part
C)
In an article entitled "Between Paris and Hezbollah, a Conflicting
Past" Le Monde comments: "A well informed source has revealed that
Paris has made contact with Iran, Hezbollah's tutor, as to its
intentions regarding the safety of military personnel deployed in
the buffer zone... France has every reason to be concerned for its
troops considering that Lebanon has in the past crystallized the
regional power struggle for influence..."
Le Parisien borrows a quotation from a military officer to title its
article "We Have Much to Fear Here." The article attributes those
fears to France's visible cooperation with the U.S. The officer
adds: "Paris is trying to strike a balance between the Americans and
the Arabs, but the Hezbollah Islamists are not fools; they know we
are directly engaged beside the Americans in Afghanistan, for
example.... Now that peace is returning, we are becoming priority
targets here." For La Croix, France will be the "backbone" of the
bolstered UNIFIL. Its article carries the optimistic words of
General Alain Pellegrini. "The new UNIFIL will be very different
from the old one. The old UNIFIL is dead. The new one will be
stronger, with greater numbers and new rules of engagement." La
Croix quotes Minister of Defense Alliot-Marie as calling the
participation of Muslim countries in the international force a "very
good thing."
In a separate article, La Croix reports details of Turkey's plans to
contribute troops. The article says a Turkish contingent may aid
"reconciliation with the United States three years after Turkey
refused to participate in the war in Iraq and to let columns of
American armor pass through its territory." Turkey may also prove to
be a "bridge between East and West" in NATO, La Croix says.
On Lebanon's reconstruction and Hezbollah's role, FR2 television
reports that "Hezbollah was quicker than the Lebanese government and
promised the population money and housing." Many civilians
interviewed thanked Hezbollah and said that they felt "safe" because
they "trusted them". FR2 observed the perfect organization of the
movement and said that Hezbollah "was establishing itself as a
political and a social force in Lebanon."
Le Figaro carries two op-eds on the Middle East and on the war on
terror. The latter, by George Soros is a French translation of a
Syndicated column in which Soros says that the "'war against
terrorism' is a nefarious and aberrant notion." The former, by the
British-Lebanese writer Percy Kemp is entitled "In the Middle East,
Ideas Can Be Killers." Kemp comments: "I would love to believe the
Americans are in Iraq for its oil. But the fact is that they are in
Iraq because of the 'idea' they have of the New Middle East...
Similarly, Hezbollah is launching its missiles not to regain land
from Israel, but because of the 'idea' it has of martyrdom..."
(C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES:
Lebanon - International Force - France's Conditions
"France on the Front Line"
Pierre Rousselin in right-of-center Le Figaro (08/18): "If France is
taking the lead of the international force it is because of France's
relationship with Lebanon and because it is a way to return to the
Middle East in a central role, after having been evicted by
America's unilateralism... Playing this role implies that France has
the right to speak its mind. But taking on this role has its price,
as evidenced by the lack of other candidates for the mission...
Twenty-three years after France left Lebanon, the risks are just as
great, in view of Iran and Syria's intransigence. This must not lead
France to shirk its responsibility. But France has a right to ask
for the enlarged UNIFIL's mission to have a chance at being
successful... 'This hot potato' must not be passed on solely to
France: others must also participate. And to avoid having France
look like the West's armed representative, Arab and Muslim nations
must participate... The previous situation in Bosnia, with a
resolution that did not mention the use of force, must be avoided.
It is normal that France should demand guarantees before taking on
the command of the UNIFIL... For the good of the mission, it is
normal for France to set its conditions."
"Resistance"
Gerard Dupuy in left-of-center Liberation (08/18): "President
Chirac's offer to send an initial contingent of 200 soldiers... is
akin to diplomatically flipping the bird to Kofi Annan... The
situation could turn out to be a trap for France's soldiers. This is
why Chirac has every right to demand that as little ambiguity as
possible remain before sending his troops... Disarming Hezbollah
remains the major problem, considering that Israel has been unable
to do it and the Lebanese army is not even trying... But things
could be moving: Mahmoud Abbas's call for an end to the strikes on
Israel by 'armed groups from Gaza' is one indication. And if things
are beginning to move, it is all the more reason not to act
precipitously. UNIFIL soldiers can accompany peace, they cannot
invent it."
"France Reluctant"
Isabelle Lasserre in right-of-center Le Figaro (08/18): "France's
politicians are dragging their feet... France wants more guarantees
on the nature of the mission... or it will revise the number of
soldiers it is ready to send... France is concerned about the
'evasive' nature of resolution 1701... Without the proper means and
veritable rules of engagement, French soldiers could find themselves
in the crossfire between the Israelis and Hezbollah's militia."
U.S. Policy in the Middle East - Secretary Rice in Command
"Bush Delegates Middle East to Condoleezza Rice"
Guillemette Faure in right-of-center Le Figaro (08/18): "Since last
July, Condoleezza Rice has taken over America's Middle East policy.
She elicits less hostility abroad than the President. She is also
more effective in defending America's policy at home. According to a
CNN poll, 62 % of respondents regard Secretary Rice as the
administration's most popular figure... She has been able to explain
at home that the new Middle East will be preferable to the semblance
of peace that existed previously... Although Rice supported the
'preemptive' attack on Iraq, public opinion does not hold it against
her. She is well liked at the State Department, where her
accessibility and listening qualities are heralded. Contrary to
Madeleine Albright, who was appreciated abroad but held in contempt
by her colleagues. Most importantly, she has the support of the
President, unlike her predecessor, Colin Powell... But her initial
interventions in the Lebanese crisis were not convincing. Her
efforts were limited to a paradoxical diplomatic shuttle during
which she tried to explain that the U.S. wanted peace but not right
away... Another paradox lies in the team that accompanies her in the
negotiations. Elliott Abrams and David Welch are very dissimilar...
Abrams... is of the school that believes the U.S. can make
democratic inroads in the Middle East and that a confrontation with
Iran is inevitable. Welch on the other hand is more favorable to
stability than democratic revolution... The question now is whether
Secretary Rice will be able to continue as mediator of opposing
SIPDIS
views within the Administration, while having to endorse front line
choices. Already she is facing criticism as her effectiveness begins
to be questioned." HOFMANN