Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Search

 

Cablegate: Court Acquits Srp Parliamentarian Ho Vann Of

VZCZCXRO2301
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHPF #0716/01 2661135
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 231135Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1209
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PHNOM PENH 000716

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/MLS, DRL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL KJUS CB
SUBJECT: COURT ACQUITS SRP PARLIAMENTARIAN HO VANN OF
DEFAMATION; FINES JOURNALISTS UNDER PRESS LAW

REF: PHNOM PENH 413

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In a surprise verdict September 22, the
Phnom Penh Municipal Court acquitted opposition
Parliamentarian Ho Vann of defamation charges, but fined
Cambodia Daily editor-in-chief Kevin Doyle and journalist Nou
Vannarinn for violating the Press Law on publishing
retractions. The plaintiffs--22 RCAF officials who sued as a
unit--have 30 days to appeal. It remains unclear whether Ho
Vann's parliamentary immunity will be restored by a
two-thirds vote in the National Assembly. END SUMMARY.

------------------
Surprise Acquittal
------------------

2. (SBU) The Phnom Penh Municipal Court surprised observers
September 22, when Judge Suon Visal acquitted opposition
Parliamentarian Ho Vann, a member of the Sam Rainsy Party, of
all charges relating to a defamation complaint filed by 22
Royal Cambodian Armed Forces (RCAF) soldiers. The judge
stated that based on Ho Vann's actions to clarify what he
said were misquotes by The Cambodia Daily reporter Nou
Vannarinn, and the newspaper's inability to provide the
original interview notes of the conversation, there was no
evidence that Ho Vann intended to defame the soldiers.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

--------------------------------------------- -
Journalists Liable for Civil Infraction; Fined
--------------------------------------------- -

3. (SBU) The court also dismissed defamation charges against
The Cambodia Daily editor-in-chief Kevin Doyle and reporter
Nou Vannarinn, but found them liable under Article 10 of the
Press Law, which stipulates how media outlets must handle
requested retractions. The Press Law requires media outlets
to publish retractions or replies to statements in the next
issue after receiving a request for retraction or reply; the
retraction or reply must also be published in the same
language in which it was received, on the same page where the
original article appeared, and must be the same size font as
the original article. After the article in question was
published, Ho Vann wrote a letter in Khmer to The Cambodia
Daily requesting a clarification and claiming he was
misquoted in the article, which was published in both English
and Khmer editions of The Cambodia Daily. But The Cambodia
Daily published only an English translation of his letter in
the "Letters to the Editor" section, although the original
article appeared on the front page, and did not publish
anything in the Khmer-language edition until a few days
later. The judge found the journalists liable for that
infraction, and ordered each to pay a fine of 4 million Riels
(approximately $1,000 USD), as permitted under the law.

---------------
Case Background
---------------

4. (SBU) In April, 22 RCAF soldiers alleged that Ho Vann
defamed them and was attempting to incite the public when he
reportedly told journalist Nou Vannarinn that degrees earned
by the soldiers from a Vietnamese military institute were
"worthless." Following publication of those comments, Ho
Vann wrote to The Cambodia Daily, claiming Nou misquoted him,
and clarifying his actual statements (reftel). The
clarification appeared to resolve the complaint until June
22, when the National Assembly stripped Ho Vann of his
parliamentary immunity in order to allow the charges to
proceed. Ho Vann thereafter departed Cambodia for the United
States.

5. (SBU) The court proceeded against Ho Vann in absentia on
July 17, although it charged him only with defamation (which
leads to monetary fines), and not the more serious charge of
incitement (which can lead to jail) as the plaintiffs' lawyer
had originally requested. Nou Vannarinn was initially the
only other defendant, and he refused to speak during the
hearing since he had no legal representation. However, the
judge suspended the hearing after a letter from The Cambodia
Daily editor-in-chief Kevin Doyle was read into the record,
in which Doyle claimed responsibility for publishing the
article and asked the judge to charge him instead of his
reporter. The judge suspended the hearing until Doyle could
offer his statement in court. When the hearing resumed on
September 9 with Doyle in attendance, the court charged both
the editor and the reporter with defamation and the Press Law
infraction. The judge delivered his verdict as expected on

PHNOM PENH 00000716 002 OF 002


September 22.

-------
COMMENT
-------

6. (SBU) The case against Ho Vann has largely been eclipsed
by the defamation case against his National Assembly and
party colleague, Mu Sochua. In June, when the National
Assembly stripped the immunity of both parliamentarians, Ho
Vann expressed shock at the vote, claiming the complaint
against him had been resolved through discussions between the
parties. Ho Vann thereafter departed Cambodia, did not
attend any of the trial, nor was he represented by a lawyer.
His acquittal this week stunned most observers, who believed
a defamation conviction for both Ho Vann and the journalists
was a foregone conclusion. It remains unclear whether the
plaintiffs will appeal or whether the National Assembly will
restore Ho Vann's immunity. For the moment, at least, this
case is a welcome relief from the recent spate of convictions
on defamation charges. As Ou Virak, President of the
Cambodia Center for Human Rights, noted following the
hearing: "it's a little light in the darkness." More likely
is that the verdict in this case reflects the early attempts
by Ho Vann to correct what he always said was a misquote,
thereby limiting or eliminating any vestige of personal
affront and provocation that seem to characterize many
similar cases.
RODLEY

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.