Cablegate: Seoul - Press Bulletin; September 25, 2009
DE RUEHUL #1539/01 2680757
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 250757Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5758
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 9202
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC//DDI/OEA//
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI//FPA//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC//DB-Z//
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0334
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6692
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6764
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1313
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 5085
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 4043
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 7257
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1559
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2871
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1949
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 2557
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SEOUL 001539
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR ECON KPAO KS US
SUBJECT: SEOUL - PRESS BULLETIN; September 25, 2009
Chosun Ilbo, All TVs
Leaders Pledge Closer ROK-Japan Ties; Hatoyama Says
Tokyo has Courage to Face up to History
With Coffers Overflowing with Dollars, China Invested $60.9 Billion
in First Half Alone to Secure Overseas Energy Resources
Seoul National University Promotes Only 38 Percent of Candidates to
Hankook Ilbo, Hankyoreh Shinmun, Segye Ilbo,
Court: Nighttime Rally Ban Is Incompatible with Constitution
Chinese President Hu Jintao, during a Sept. 23 summit in New York
with President Lee Myung-bak, said that North Korea sees bilateral
talks with the U.S. as a requirement and multilateral talks as an
The leaders of the ROK, China and Japan will meet in Beijing on Oct.
10 to discuss ways to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue. (All)
Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg will visit five Asian
countries from Sept. 25-Oct. 1, including the ROK, China and Japan.
He will visit Seoul from Sept. 29-30, accompanied by Sung Kim,
Special Envoy for the Six-Party Talks and other White House and
Defense Department officials. (Chosun, Hankook)
According to the Korea International Trade Association, 91.8 percent
of the U.S. stakeholders surveyed said that they support the KORUS
The U.N. Security Council yesterday unanimously adopted "Resolution
1887" that "empowers" nuclear technology suppliers to require the
return of nuclear material and equipment from recipient states that
diverted it for military purposes. The resolution makes no direct
reference to Iran and North Korea, but targets the two countries.
All ROK media gave front-and inside-page play to yesterday's
unanimous adoption by the UN Security Council of "Resolution 1887"
and noted that the resolution "empowers" nuclear technology
suppliers to "require the return of" nuclear equipment and materials
from recipient states that have diverted it for military purposes.
The ROK media cited foreign media analyses that the resolution makes
no direct reference to Iran and North Korea but targets the two
Right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo quoted President Obama, who chaired
the United Nations Security Council session, as asserting: "(The
resolution) calls on all states to freeze any financial assets that
are being used for proliferation. And it calls for stronger
safeguards to reduce the likelihood that peaceful nuclear weapons
SEOUL 00001539 002 OF 004
programs can be diverted to a weapons program." JoongAng's
inside-page headline read: "Obama, who Seeks World without Nuclear
Weapons, Sends Strong Warning to N. Korea and Iran."
JoongAng Ilbo also noted a Sept. 23 ROK-China summit held on the
sidelines of the UN gatherings in New York, quoting an ROKG official
as saying: "Chinese President Hu Jintao told ROK President Lee
Myung-bak that North Korea sees bilateral talks with the U.S. as a
requirement and multilateral talks as an option." The Chinese
leader was further quoted: "North Korea may return to the Six-Party
Talks, but the nuance, in fact, was that it is unlikely."
Controversy over President Lee's "Grand Bargain" Proposal on N.
Korea's Nuclear Issue
In a commentary, JoongAng Ilbo argued: "The February 13 Agreement
failed not because it was a step-by-step approach but because it
carelessly handled the sensitive issue of verification at a stage
between North Korea's nuclear disablement and nuclear dismantlement.
If President Lee's 'grand bargain' is to mark a decisive milestone
in denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula, the U.S. and the ROK should
learn a lesson from their failure in implementing the February 13
Agreement and come up with a compromise between the U.S.'s 'package
deal' and the ROK's 'grand bargain.' The ROK should also make every
effort to persuade the North (to abandon its nuclear ambitions)
while restoring inter-Korean relations and giving the North what it
is supposed to receive. It is a narrow-minded, impractical
political action for Seoul to offer (only) a series of half-baked
proposals just in order to take the leadership in resolving the
nuclear issue. What matters is denuclearization, not who takes the
Moderate Hankook Ilbo editorialized: "Given its pathological
distrust and suspicion of international society, North Korea will
not agree to dismantle its nuclear program before receiving
comprehensive compensation. The 'grand bargain,' which calls for
the North's denuclearization while at the same offering
comprehensive aid, will be more useful in bringing North Korea back
to the negotiating table. However, the 'grand bargain' would end up
being merely empty rhetoric unless the Six-Party countries dispel
mutual distrust and reconcile different interests among themselves.
The ROKG has a long way to go to take a leading role in resolving
the North Korean nuclear issue."
Most media reported on today's opening of the G20 leaders' summit in
Pittsburgh. Right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo wrote in the headline:
"Main Agenda Item is Exit Strategy from Stimulus Measures, But G20
Engage in War of Nerves over 'Side Menus'" The article's sub-heads
read: "China Suggests Multinational Sovereign Fund;" "Latin
America Calls for Increase in IMF Quotas to Emerging Markets and
Developing Countries;" and "U.S., U.K. Call to Ease Trade
WAYS FOR PRESIDENT LEE'S "GRAND BARGAIN" PROPOSAL TO SURVIVE
(JoongAng Ilbo, September 25, 2009, Page 47; Excerpts)
By Senior Journalist Kim Young-hie
The North Korean nuclear issue is suddenly moving away from the
phase of sanctions and confrontation to the phase of dialogue and
negotiations. This is the time when the ROK-U.S. cooperation should
be watertight. Therefore, officials of the two nations have made
frequent visits to each other's nation. At this critical moment, we
believed that there was not a single problem in ROK-U.S.
cooperation. But what is all this about? The USG is sneering at
and disregarding the ambitious proposal that President Lee Myung-bak
put forward in New York to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue.
Unless the Obama Administration intentionally did so with hidden
intentions, it means that the ROKG's foreign policy and security
SEOUL 00001539 003 OF 004
officials have been negligent in having prior consultations with
President Lee's proposal marks a meaningful shift in North Korea
policy. His statement that North Korea's economic growth takes
precedence over unification is the same as the basic philosophy of
the Kim Dae-jung Administration's Sunshine Policy - that the
establishment of peace should come before unification. Since
taking office, President Lee has not softened his hard-line policy
toward the North. His remark in New York can be said to signal that
such a hard-line stance may be eased. It remains to be seen how
Pyongyang will respond to it, but Seoul's hard-line stance on the
North seems be at a turning point. Given this significance carried
by President Lee's proposal, it is shocking that the Obama
Administration is cool to it. The statements by the State
Department Spokesman and the Assistant Secretary of State for East
Asian and Pacific Affairs - "This is his policy" and "Actually, I -
to be perfectly honest, I was not aware of that" - are what we
expect to see between North Korea and the U.S. The ROK Foreign
Ministry said that it explained the "grand bargain" to the U.S.
Embassy in Seoul, but it does not appear that (this explanation) was
delivered to high-ranking officials in Washington. This does not
make sense. U.S. Assistant Secretary Campbell noted that even in
the ROK-U.S. Foreign Ministers' meeting, which was held before
President Lee's speech, the "grand bargain" did not come up. The
Foreign Ministry's explanation is all the more confusing.
Due to this confusion, discussions about the validity of the "grand
bargain" have been put on the backburner. The proposal has one good
point and one bad point. The good point is that the "grand bargain"
signifies a U-turn from Seoul's hard-line attitude toward the North.
Recently, two changes happened in North Korea. The one is that the
North began feeling the effects of the sanctions imposed by the UN
and the U.S. The other is that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il
became healthy enough to be back in the saddle. Against this
backdrop, Kim called in former U.S. President Bill Clinton to
Pyongyang and handed over the detained U.S. journalists to him,
released a Hyundai Asan employee and ROK fishermen, and sent a
special envoy to the ROK under the pretext of mourning the late
President Kim Dae-jung. These are Kim's conciliatory gestures.
The bad point of the "grand bargain" is that considering the
complicated nature of the denuclearization process, it is rather
unrealistic. Even if Six-Party countries or three parties (the ROK,
the North, and the U.S.) or two parties (the U.S. and the North)
successfully reach an agreement with North Korea while placing
nuclear abandonment, a security guarantee and economic aid on the
negotiation table at the same time, the process of implementing the
agreement will have to go through some steps. At every step of the
process, Pyongyang could employ stalling tactics, renege on an
agreement, be unduly stubborn, or ask for more, as it has done so
The February 13 Agreement failed not because it was a step-by-step
approach but because it carelessly handled the sensitive issue of
verification at a stage between North Korea's nuclear disablement
and nuclear dismantlement. If President Lee's "grand bargain" is to
mark a decisive milestone in denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula,
the U.S. and the ROK should learn a lesson from their failure in
implementing the February 13 Agreement and come up with a compromise
between the U.S.'s 'package deal' and the ROK's 'grand bargain.'
The ROK should also make every effort to persuade the North (to
abandon its nuclear ambitions) while restoring inter-Korean
relations and giving the North what it is supposed to receive. It
is a narrow-minded, impractical political action for Seoul to offer
(only) a series of half-baked proposals just in order to take the
leadership in resolving the nuclear issue. What matters is
denuclearization, not who takes the leadership.
ROK, U.S. OUT OF SYNC ON N. KOREA
(Hankook Ilbo, September 25, 2009, page 39)
After President Lee Myung-bak proposed a grand bargain in a speech
SEOUL 00001539 004 OF 004
during his visit to the U.S., it appeared that the ROK and the U.S.
were out of sync on this matter. Now both countries are swiftly
moving to patch up any differences. Yesterday, they stressed in
unison that they have no disagreements and are coordinating closely
together. The U.S. State Department had reacted coolly at first;
State Department Spokesman Ian Kelly said, "This is his policy," and
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
Kurt Campbell said, "Actually, I -- to be perfectly honest, I was
not aware of that." We believe that the ROK and the U.S. lacked
communication or prior coordination.
In fact, the grand bargain and the comprehensive package deal, on
which the U.S has consulted with the Six-Party countries, are not
much different. Under the U.S.-envisioned package deal, North Korea
will receive political and military security assurances and economic
assistance if North Korea implements irreversible denuclearization.
This is very similar to President Lee's grand bargain which calls
for dismantling the core parts of North Korea's nuclear program
while at the same time providing a security guarantee and
international economic assistance. The ROK and the U.S. shared the
understanding at the June ROK-U.S. summit that North Korea's nuclear
issue should be resolved comprehensively. Therefore, it is natural
for both countries to espouse similar positions.
However, there are subtle differences. The U.S. package deal
requires Pyongyang to seek denuclearization first. Meanwhile,
President Lee's grand bargain calls for North Korea's
denuclearization while at the same time offering comprehensive aid.
This is why the Blue House officials are referring to the grand
bargain as a "one-shot deal." It seems that the U.S., which deeply
distrusts the North, has a good reason to think that the ROK went
too far. The ROKG said that it notified the USG about the (grand
bargain) concept through the Charge d' Affaires of the U.S. Embassy
in Seoul, but it is doubtful whether the differences in their
positions were also conveyed. This is why we are concerned that the
ROK failed to communicate with the U.S. properly.
Given its pathological distrust and suspicion of international
society, North Korea will not agree to dismantle its nuclear program
before receiving comprehensive compensation. The 'grand bargain,'
(which calls for the North's denuclearization while at the same
offering comprehensive aid,) will be more useful in bringing North
Korea back to the negotiating table. However, the 'grand bargain'
would end up being merely empty rhetoric unless the Six-Party
countries dispel mutual distrust and reconcile different interests
among themselves. The ROKG has a long way to go to take a leading
role in resolving the North Korean nuclear issue.