World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


Copenhagen: A Disaster For The World's Poorest

Copenhagen: A Disaster For The World's Poorest

Akanimo Sampson,
Port Harcourt

Copenhagen: Disaster For Nigeria, Other Poor Countries, Says Bassey

THE Nigerian Chair of the Friends of the Earth International (FOEI), a global federation of environmental rights advocacy groups, Nnimmo Bassey, says the failure of rich industrialised countries of the world to secure a strong and fair United Nations agreement to tackle climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark, will spell disaster for Nigeria and other poor countries.

Bassey who was speaking in an interview with our correspondent on-line on Monday, said, ''Copenhagen has been an abject failure. Justice has not been done. By delaying action, rich countries have condemned millions of the world¹s poorest people to hunger, suffering and loss of life as climate change accelerates. The blame for this disastrous outcome is squarely on the developed nations''.

According to him, ''FoEI is disgusted by the failure of rich countries to commit to the
emissions reductions they know are needed, especially the US, which is the world's largest historical emitter of greenhouse gases. In contrast African nations, China and others in the developing world deserve praise for their progressive positions and constructive approach. Major developing countries cannot be blamed for the failure of rich
industrialised countries''.

A confidential United Nations paper leaked on December 17, 2009 however, predicts that
average temperatures rise will far exceed the 2 degree threshold set by the UN even if current international pledges are fully implemented. ''This is effectively a death sentence for many in some of the world¹s most vulnerable countries, including small island states, who had demanded a limit of 1.5 degrees'', the FoEI chair said.

The full account of the interview went thus:

''Instead of committing to deep cuts in emissions and putting new, public money on the table to help solve the climate crisis, rich countries have bullied developing nations to accept far less. Those most responsible for putting the planet in this mess have not shown the guts required to fix it and have instead acted to protect short-term political interests.

''The only real leadership at the conference has come from the hundreds of thousands of ordinary people who¹ve come together to demand strong action to prevent climate catastrophe. Their voices are loud and growing and FoEI will continue to be part of the
fight for climate justice.

FoEI has been one of the key contributors to the alternative people's summit known as the Klimaforum with allied organisations such as La Via Campesina and the World March of Women.

''We will continue to fight for a strong and fair agreement to tackle climate change.There is a growing climate justice movement and more and more people are getting involved. This is the beginning of change. Everyone can pressure their government to take a stronger stance. Everyone can take action to tackle climate change, consuming less, saving energy and improving energy efficiency for instance''.

What The Copenhagen Talks Failed To Achieve:

Rich, developed countries did not commit to cut their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% in comparison with 1990 levels by 2020. These cuts should be made at home - with no offsetting. Offsetting, including through the 'Clean Development Mechanism',
is a false solution and should be rejected.

Rich, developed countries did not acknowledge the climate debt that they owe to developing countries as a result of decades of pollution.

The World Bank and its climate funds have not been rejected despite the fact that they are set to increase developing country debt and promote dirty energy such as ³clean² coal.

Forests are still included in Œcarbon offsetting initiatives¹ and this does not help to combat climate change. It diverts attention from the real solutions to climate change and deforestation. Copenhagen talks did not state that plantations are not forests.
Damaging monoculture tree plantations have not been excluded from the UN climate negotiations.

False solutions like nuclear energy and agrofuels have not been excluded from the UN talks.


© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Assange's Hearing: Latest Observations From Court

Despite severe restrictions on observers, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is the only NGO that has gained access to the hearing, and we’ve managed to monitor proceedings on most days. We will continue to do so whenever possible. Yesterday I was in court ... More>>

Climate Change: Record Northern Heat, Fuels Concerns Over US Wildfire Destruction

More than 78,000 acres of forest in the Sierra mountains in California has been lost due to wildfires. Photo: San Francisco Fire Department The northern hemisphere experienced its warmest August ever, the World Meteorological Organization ( WMO ... More>>

ILO: Impact On Workers Of COVID-19 Is ‘catastrophic’

COVID-19 has had a “catastrophic” impact on workers, the head of the International Labour Organization ( ILO ) said on Wednesday, with lost working hours higher than originally forecast, and equivalent to 495 million full-time jobs globally in the ... More>>

UN: WHO Warns Against Potential Ebola Spread In DR Congo And Beyond

Ebola is spreading in a western province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), raising fears that the disease could reach neighbouring Republic of Congo and even the capital, Kinshasa, the World Health Organization (WHO) said on Friday. ... More>>