Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

Diplomats Agree To Conclude Arms Treaty in 2013

Diplomats Agree To Conclude Arms Treaty in 2013

Governments pass UN resolution to hold major diplomatic conference next year with an unprecedented 157 YES votes, including China for the first time, 18 abstentions & 0 votes against

New York: Governments negotiating an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) need to ensure next year’s diplomatic conference - aimed at regulating the US$70 billion-worth weapons trade - is a success, said the Control Arms coalition today.

Discussions, over the last four weeks at the United Nations on the next steps for negotiations on a future treaty aimed at regulating the trade in conventional weapons and ammunition, ended today with the agreement to hold new talks next year.

Prior negotiations on the ATT, which took place during a Diplomatic Conference in July, ended in failure after several governments, including the United States, blocked the agreement by demanding extra time to agree on a draft text.

Diplomats voted on Wednesday in favour of holding a final UN Conference on the ATT in March 2013, with the controversial stipulation that the text must be agreed under the ‘consensus’ rule. Following intense lobbying by civil society, the resolution contains a proviso if all states are unable to agree to a deal in March, the UN will keep the treaty on its current agenda. This would allow the text to be sent for a final vote at the UN General Assembly later in 2013.

“Every day we are reminded of the need to bring the arms trade under control. In Syria, we have seen the death toll rise well over 30,000 with weapons and ammunition pouring in the country for months now. While agreeing on a deal next year is what’s needed, we do not want any Arms Trade Treaty. We need a treaty that will set tough rules to control the arms trade, that will save lives and truly make the world a better place,” said Jeff Abramson, Director of the Control Arms Secretariat.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

New Zealand was among the countries that voted for the resolution. The New Zealand delegation to the UN made a statement earlier this month calling for an ATT “broad in scope, and capable of comprehensively covering the full range of conventional weapons which are traded on the international market including small arms and light weapons as well as ammunition.”

This principled stance was welcomed by New Zealand-based campaigners. “As an influential player in the UN arms control agenda, many small and vulnerable states look to New Zealand to lead the charge in ensuring the highest possible standards are enshrined in the ATT. We commend the New Zealand government for taking this position and call on them to take a leadership role in the March 2013 negotiations,” said Luke Roughton, Control Arms Coordinator at Oxfam New Zealand.

The UN resolution agreed today will base future negotiations on a draft treaty text from the July 2012 Diplomatic Conference. The draft gives a good basis for a strong treaty, but has a few “missing pieces” which must be resolved to ensure it is an effective treaty.

The coalition is working to improve the text around several issues. One major concern is that ammunition, a deadly trade of over $US 4 billion annually which needs to be better regulated and monitored, is not yet properly included. Another clause could exempt weapons transfers from the treaty if they are labelled as part of a “national defense cooperation agreement”, leaving many current and future agreements outside the realm of an ATT. Campaigners are also worried that the threshold for denying an arms transfer is currently set too high, so that some irresponsible deals could still slip through the net.

“It is the voices of the overwhelming majority of states that want a strong treaty which must now be heard. While a treaty which includes the greatest number of states remains the core objective, a robust text will prove far more effective in the future than a compromise text that states subscribe to, but subsequently ignore. The agreement next year must be one that will ultimately make the greatest difference for victims of armed violence,” said Anna McDonald, Head of arms control at Oxfam.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.