Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

ICTJ Concerned By Retroactive Sentencing In Bangladesh

ICTJ Concerned By Retroactive Sentencing In Bangladesh Genocide Trial

NEW YORK, September 19, 2013 — The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) has expressed concern over the Bangladesh Supreme Court’s sentencing to death yesterday of Abdul Quader Mollah, a senior leader in Bangladesh’s largest Islamic party, for crimes against humanity committed during the country’s 1971 war of independence with Pakistan. The decision retroactively increased Mollah’s original penalty from life imprisonment to capital punishment, in breach of international legal conventions. 

In February, the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh had convicted Mollah on five counts of crimes against humanity and sentenced him to life in prison. However, the government subsequently changed the law, allowing for appeals against lenient sentences and retroactive application of the death penalty.

“The convictions and sentencing in the Bangladesh genocide trials are a cause of deep and immediate concern. The atrocities that took place in Bangladesh in 1971 require proper investigations and for justice to be done,” said David Tolbert, president of ICTJ. “But it must be done in a fair and transparent way.”

The decision has been denounced by human rights groups and Mollah’s defense team as a breach of fair trial standards and international conventions, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Bangladesh signed in 2000.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Further, there are a number of indications that the trials, and in particular the decision to impose the death penalty in Mollah’s case, resulted at least in part from political pressure and interventions.

“ICTJ stands in the forefront of the call for accountability for serious human rights violations and in particular in seeing effective national prosecutions takes place. That effectiveness is undermined where there appears to be a political agenda or political interference with the judicial process,” added Tolbert.

The International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh was set up in 2009 to investigate and prosecute suspects for the genocide committed in the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. A vast number of people were killed during the fighting, and many more were victims of displacement, enforced disappearance, sexual violence, and other human rights violations.

Mass protests have been held against the tribunal’s original sentences, calling for stiffer penalties for those convicted of war crimes. Counter protests and a general strike were launched by Mollah’s Jamaat-e-Islami party, charging that trials have been politically motivated, as many accused are Jamaat leaders.

“The victims and the society as a whole have a right to justice,” said Tolbert. “The cause of justice must provide not only vindication of the victims, but a renewed trust in the justice system as a whole for all citizens.” 

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.