Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

AFTINET Welcomes Committee Recommendations For Small Changes In The Trade Agreement Process, But More Needed

The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCOT) has finally released its Report 193 on the trade agreement process in Australia, 12 months after public hearings were completed.

“We welcome the Report’s modest recommendations in the direction of more transparency and independent evaluation of trade agreements. This is the first time that a government-dominated committee has recommended changes to the process, and is a small response to our advocacy over many years, but more is needed,” Dr Patricia Ranald, AFTINET Convenor, said today.

“Trade negotiations are initiated by Cabinet, negotiated in secret with very limited public consultation, and the text is not published until after they are signed. There is no independent evaluation of the economic, social or environmental costs and benefits of agreements before they are signed, and Parliament only votes on the enabling legislation, not on the whole text of the agreement,” explained Dr Ranald

The government-controlled majority committee report recommends that the Government should publish negotiation aims and objectives for all future trade treaty negotiations and the Government should brief the JSCOT twice a year on the status of upcoming and current free trade agreement negotiations.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

The Report also recommends consideration of the use of non-disclosure agreements with key stakeholders to allow for improved consultation in certain areas of trade agreement negotiations, and consideration of a process through which independent modelling and analysis of a trade agreement, is undertaken in the future by an independent expert body, and provided to the Committee alongside the National Interest Analysis.

“We note that the independent evaluation would be undertaken only after the agreement is signed, when the agreement would be difficult to change. This is too late in the process, and lags behind global trends for more open processes like those of the European Union,” said Dr Ranald.

“The Labor and Green minority on the committee supported further changes, which we welcome, including that the text be published and independently evaluated after trade negotiations are completed, but before agreements are signed,” said Dr Ranald.

“The Committee’s recommendations are not binding on the government, but we hope the government will respond and take action,” said Dr Ranald

See more detailed analysis of the committee report here.

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.