Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 


Council Drives Hard Bargain on Waterfront

Council Drives Hard Bargain on Waterfront

After a marathon 5-hour meeting on Thursday (23 Nov 2006) night, the Auckland City Council put a number of conditions around their preference for a new stadium development on Auckland's waterfront. The final vote of 12 councillors to 8, reflected a vigorous and sometimes divided debate which centred mostly on provisions central government would have to satisfy for the stadium to progress.

The requirements for a new development included the site shifting substantially to the east of government's published position while ensuring port operations and commercial return were not adversely affected. There was considerable discussion around financial contributions and a requirement that the stadium be owned and operated by central government and that all construction and operational costs were its responsibility including any cost overruns and annual operating shortfall. The Auckland City Council also ensured that it maintains financial flexibility by reminding central government that any contribution to the capital cost was not expected and that a full financial assessment of the implications of a waterfront site would be necessary.

Team Leader of the Citizens and Ratepayers Now group of councillors, Cr Scott Milne, commented "the public and media have not appreciated the depth of research and discussion that has gone into formulating the Council's stated site preference. We have set the bar high given the precious asset under discussion. Central government has a lot of work to do negotiating with ARC (Auckland Regional Council), Ports of Auckland and other key stakeholders before reporting back to Council with a more refined proposal. The message we wanted to send as a result of their request for a preferred site was "waterfront but …". The next 2-weeks will be crucial because a government site decision, which remains over the water at Cook and Marsden wharves, will likely be rejected on the grounds that it is too instrusive and could never meet urban design guidelines which are non-negotiable."

Citizens and Ratepayers Now councillors caucused extensively prior to the debate and decided a conscious vote was appropriate. After listening to extensive debate and briefings, all members voted (substantially) the same way.

As a result of the motions passed, central government will also have to isolate Auckland ratepayers from financial risk as well as looking at Transit proposals for the completion of Grafton Gully, stage 3, which are required to be brought forward to alleviate CBD traffic congestion and facilitate better egress of container truck traffic from suburban streets and the city centre.

Cr Milne added, "This was a tough decision. Councillors were aware of the heart feeling of many Aucklanders to ensure protection of their beautiful waterfront. The motions finally passed have ensured this and more by requiring central government to build an iconic, multi-use, highly accessible, piece of infrastructure that they will continue to own and operate. The national stadium will open the waterfront, which is currently a container storage and carpark. It will be a major boost for the region while ensuring Auckland City ratepayers are not unduly burdened by costs."


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Regional
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news