Art & Entertainment | Book Reviews | Education | Entertainment Video | Health | Lifestyle | Sport | Sport Video | Search


Google Steals Taonga, Rips Off Law Commissioners

Dr Lynley Hood (author)

For hundreds of New Zealand authors the alarming truth is just beginning to sink in: Google has stolen our intellectual property (and in doing so has stolen our most valuable possession and our livelihood).

Since 2004, through agreements with major universities and libraries around the world, Google has scanned millions of books, including many in-copyright books by international authors. For writers, it’s not so much the scanning that’s the problem, it’s the fact that those millions of books have been scanned in their entirety without the knowledge or consent of the copyright holders.

It is supremely ironic that among the hundreds of New Zealand titles illegally scanned by Google are Unbridled Power by President of the New Zealand Law Commission Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer SC, and Media Law by Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Law Commissioner Prof John Burrows QC and barrister Julian Miles QC. And it is profoundly distressing to find that hundreds of in-print, in-copyright books by our national treasures have suffered the same fate. A brief excursion into Google’s database of books digitised without authorisation on or before May 5, 2009 reveals multiple titles by Janet Frame, Hone Tuwhare, Sir Edmund Hillary, Witi Ihimaera, Michael King, James K Baxter, Keri Hulme, Maurice Gee, Sylvia Ashton-Warner, Charles Brasch, Marilyn Duckworth, Maurice Shadbolt, Margaret Mahy, Allen Curnow, Fiona Kidman, Bill Manhire - the list goes on.

In 2005 the US Authors Guild and a coalition of publishers filed a class-action lawsuit against Google for copyright infringement. Google argued fair use. In October 2008 formal resolution was cut short when the parties announced they had reached an out-of-court settlement. This settlement is subject to a final approval hearing in a New York Federal Court on 7 October 2009. In the meantime all authors affected by the settlement are invited to opt-in or opt-out by 4 September 2009.

In theory, this settlement should not concern us. Under New Zealand copyright law, and under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work (to which New Zealand and the US are signatories), copyrights for creative works are automatically in force upon their creation. As soon as a work is written or recorded, its author is automatically entitled to all copyrights in the work and to any derivative works, unless and until the author explicitly disclaims them or until the copyright expires. In New Zealand, copyright lasts for 50 years after the death of the author. This means that if anyone wants to use our published work during our lifetimes, or for 50 years after our deaths, they have to check with us, or with our literary executors, first.

The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand website assures us that New Zealand’s participation in various international agreements on copyright means that when your original work is created in New Zealand, it is automatically protected here and under the copyright laws in countries that are party to those agreements.

But that’s not how Google sees it. The 385-page settlement has been summarised in a FAQ sheet on the Google Settlement website ( FAQs of special interest to New Zealand writers include the following:

9. I am not a United States citizen, or I live outside of the United States. Am I included in this Settlement?

Yes, most likely you are. If you are a citizen of another country or live in another country, you are likely to own a U.S. copyright interest if:

Your Book was published in the United States;

Your Book was not published in the United States, but your country has copyright relations with the United States because it is a member of the Berne Convention; or

Your country had copyright relations with the United States at the time of the Book’s publication.

You should assume that you own a U.S. copyright interest in your Book, unless you are certain that your Book was published in, and that you reside and are located in, one of the few countries that have not had or do not now have copyright relations with the United States.

At this point we need to remind ourselves that this is a settlement between private parties in the US, yet to be ratified by a court. Nonetheless, according to Google, the settlement includes authors who are not parties to the agreement, and who do not live in, and have never published in, the US.

All of which raises the question:

17. What happens if I do nothing?

If you own a U.S. copyright interest in a Book or an Insert, you need not do anything at this time to remain in the Settlement. If you complete the Claim Form, you will receive the benefits of the Settlement if approved by the Court, and your claims for copyright infringement against Google and the Participating Libraries will be released and will be dismissed by the Court. If you remain in the class, you will be bound by any judgment or determination of the Court in connection with the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable.

Thus Google has unilaterally included all the authors of all the books published in Berne Convention countries in its settlement. According to Google, if we don’t opt out, we are in, whether we like it or not. This is a blatant breach of the Berne Convention. Under the Convention, the copyright on any book belongs to, and remains with, the author. If Google or anyone else wishes to use that copyright it must negotiate with the copyright holder first.

All of which raises another question:

21. What happens to the books of authors and publishers who opt out of the settlement?

If an author or publisher opts out of the Settlement, the terms of the Settlement will not apply to this author or publisher. This means that the author or publisher is retaining all rights to bring a legal action against Google, for digitizing and displaying the author’s or publisher’s books and Inserts, and against the Participating Libraries, if desired. It also means that the Settlement neither authorizes Google to make certain uses of these books and Inserts nor does it prohibit Google from doing so.

In other words, if we opt out of the settlement, Google reserves the right to digitise our books and do whatever it likes with them (and we won’t be compensated for breach of copyright as a result).

Do the terms of this settlement get up your nose? Do you want to object? Then consider this:

23. What is an objection?

To object to the Settlement is to submit a statement that you disagree with some aspect of it. Only Settlement Class members may object, meaning a person cannot both opt out and object at the same time. The Court considers Settlement Class members’ objections prior to deciding whether to approve the Settlement.

So if you want to point out to the Court that requiring New Zealand authors to opt-in or opt-out of the settlement breaches national and international law, you have to opt-in first. How exquisitely Kafkaesque. Maybe we should ask that question again:

25. Can I both opt out and object?

No, you cannot both object and opt out. Only Settlement Class members may object to the Settlement, and people who have opted out are no longer Settlement Class members.

Got the message? No? Then let’s ask one more time:

26. What is the difference between objecting to the Settlement and opting out of the Settlement?

You may object to the Settlement if you remain in the Settlement but disagree with some aspect of the Settlement. An objection allows your views to be heard in Court. In contrast, opting out means that you are no longer part of the Settlement and that you do not want to be subject to the Settlement’s terms and conditions. Once you opt out, you lose any right to object to the Settlement, because the Settlement will no longer affect you.

So there you have it. If you opt out, anything Google does with your work will no longer affect you. In other words, if you don’t opt-in, Google will not only consider your books to be out of print and out of copyright, it will consider you, the author, to be dead.

Well, so much for New Zealand authors, what about New Zealand readers? If this settlement enables all the world’s readers to read all the world’s books on their own hand-held devices, won’t that be a good thing? Maybe so, but that’s not what the settlement says:

37. Are there any benefits for the general public?

Yes. If the Settlement is approved, United States users will be able to search, preview and buy millions of Out-of-Print books that cannot be found in most bookstores and libraries. In addition, each public library building will have a terminal at which users can search for, read and, if the library is able, print out pages from Books in the Google database.

This FAQ tells us that the benefits of ready access (at a price) to the books which Google chooses to classify as Out-of-Print will be available only to United States users.

New Zealand authors are invited to opt-in or opt-out of the Google Book Settlement by 4 September (that’s barely two weeks away!), but for the New Zealand government there are far more fundamental issues at stake that require urgent and decisive action.

If New Zealand’s laws and international treaties are not to be over-ridden by the arbitrary and oppressive conduct of private interests beyond our shores, the government must do everything in its power to ensure that the intellectual property of New Zealanders cannot be used by Google or anyone else without the explicit consent of the copyright holders.

18 August 2009


© Scoop Media

Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

Scoop Review Of Books: Q&A: Prue Hyman On ‘Hopes Dashed?’

For Scoop Review of Books, Alison McCulloch interviewed Prue Hyman about her new book, part of the BWB Texts series, Hopes Dashed? The Economics of Gender Inequality More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Chuck Berry (And James Comey, And Bill English)

Back when many people were still treating rock’n’roll as a passing fad – was calypso going to be the new thing? – Chuck Berry knew that it had changed popular music forever. What is even more astonishing is that this 30-ish black r&b musician from a middle class family in St Louis could manage to recreate the world of white teenagers, at a time when the very notion of a “teenager” had just been invented. More>>

Howard Davis Review:
The Baroque Fusion Of L'arpeggiata

Named after a toccata by German composer Girolamo Kapsberger, L'Arpeggiata produces its unmistakable sonority mainly from the resonance of plucked strings, creating a tightly-woven acoustic texture that is both idiosyncratic and immediately identifiable. Director Christina Pluhar engenders this distinctive tonality associated with the ensemble she founded in 2000 by inviting musicians and vocalists from around the world to collaborate on specific projects illuminated by her musicological research. More>>

African Masks And Sculpture: Attic Discovery On Display At Expressions Whirinaki

Ranging from masks studded with nails and shards of glass to statues laden with magical metal, the works are from ethnic groups in nine countries ranging from Ivory Coast to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. More>>

Obituary: Andrew Little Remembers Murray Ball

“Murray mined a rich vein of New Zealand popular culture and exported it to the world. Wal and Dog and all the other Kiwi characters he crafted through Footrot Flats were hugely popular here and in Australia, Europe and North America." More>>


Organised Choas: NZ Fringe Festival 2017 Awards

Three more weeks of organised chaos have come to an end with the Wellington NZ Fringe Arts Festival Awards Ceremony as a chance to celebrate all our Fringe artists for their talent, ingenuity, and chutzpah! More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Wellington Writer Wins $US165,000 Literature Prize

Victoria University of Wellington staff member and alumna Ashleigh Young has won a prestigious Windham-Campbell Literature Prize worth USD$165,000 for her book of essays Can You Tolerate This? More>>


Scoop Review Of Books: We’re All Lab Rats

A couple of years ago, there were reports that Silicon Valley executives were sending their children to tech-free schools. It was a story that dripped of irony: geeks in the heart of techno-utopia rejecting their ideology when it came to their own kids. But the story didn’t catch on, and an awkward question lingered. Why were the engineers of the future desperate to part their gadgets from their children? More>>

  • CensusAtSchool - Most kids have no screen-time limits
  • Netsafe - Half of NZ high school students unsupervised online
  • Get More From Scoop



    Search Scoop  
    Powered by Vodafone
    NZ independent news