Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Howard's End: US Sets Trend For Privacy Issues

Privacy issues are reaching the courts in growing numbers and are having a crippling effect on companies. On Monday yet another US company was sued for attempting to sell its customer information along with the rest of its assets. John Howard writes.

The message coming through right now is that if you are even thinking of disclosing or selling the private information of one of your customers - Don't.

On Monday, the US Federal Trade Commssion sued the now-defunct website for attempting to sell its customer information along with the rest of its assets.

This law suit is just the latest in a long list of global companies who are now finding the temptation to sell-off or use its customer base against its rivals may bring catastrophic financial penalities or damages.

Companies who ask for a customer's age or gender as a requirement for suscribing to a new e-mail newsletter, for example, could likely face privacy claims - and possible damages.

The simple message is that if it is not relevant - don't ask.

Many consumers are now becoming increasingly concerned about privacy issues because of technology which is able to track Internet users click by click.

But it is not just localised to the Internet. Corporate priorities are shifting even in traditional companies with the litmus test for consumer acceptance of the company and its products now being a dedicated policy to privacy issues.

"Privacy issues went from being a minor issue in most companies to something which could threaten their basic revenue model, or make their costly merger turn to dust," says Alan Westlin who helped write the US Privacy Act of 1974.

"Companies failed to fully address the privacy issue for two decades. But that's changed because of recent lawsuits by consumers alleging loss of privacy and high-profile publicity surrounding how easy it is to track people with technology," he said.

Too often, companies who face stiff competition start thinking about using customer information as leverage over their competitors. The temptation can be powerful, but it must be rejected because it can damage a company more than any rival can.

Frequently, consumers will voluntarily disclose personal information from income to e-mail addresses, but that information does not belong to anybody but the person who discloses it.

Many of the global corporate icons like American Express and AT&T are clearly worried that their privacy policies are not keeping pace with new technology and they have hired or are hiring, privacy officers and placing them at the top of the corporate ladder.

Companies are seeking people who have a knowledge of history and law and know something about technology so that they can't be techno-dazzled by explanations that don't hold water.

In addition to any privacy laws, consumers also have a right not to be indexed - a right to encrypt personal communications - a right to fair treatment in public key infrastructures so that no person is unfairly excluded in a way that would prejudice that person's ability to protect their privacy - a right going beyond the OECD openness principle, of disclosure of the collections to which others will have access and which affect the projection of the profile of the individual concerned.

Companies wanting to avoid allegations of privacy breaches and the public relations and financial nightmare which goes with that, and if they want to protect their consumers from privacy invasions, a dedicated privacy policy might not be a bad idea.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news