Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Ash Pulcifer: The U.S. Should Not Rule By Force

The U.S. Should Not Rule By Force


By Ash Pulcifer
YellowTimes.org Column

(YellowTimes.org) – The vision espoused by the Bush administration and other American elites is one in which the United States plays the role of the "indispensable nation," needed by the global community to preserve world order. This attitude of Washington further highlights how the mission to turn the United Nations into the moderator of world order has failed. In Washington's eyes, the United Nations can continue to do its humanitarian work, but the world now must come to understand that the United States is the only state that is strong enough militarily to neutralize governments considered dangerous to Washington's definition of a desirable world order.

This argument is only valid, however, if one overlooks the fundamental fact that much of the world does not accept the United States as being the global policeman and ultimate enforcer of world order. There is simply too much distaste for the United States abroad for the U.S. to be able to rule the world through persuasion rather than coercion. In Middle Eastern countries, for example, there is genuine hatred for U.S. policies, and in Western Europe there is a growing revulsion toward U.S. hegemonic ambitions. This anger is founded upon the disagreement with the U.S. societal model. In other words, much of the world is not yet convinced that the "American way" is the right way.

Of course, there is much to be envied in U.S. society. Compared to much of the world, the U.S. can boast of attractive freedoms and opportunities for its citizens, but there is also a lot to be avoided, such as America's consistent failure to take care of the less privileged members of its society. Other advanced countries, which also share the great freedoms and opportunities found in the United States, have more socialistic domestic policies, in which the state's accumulated wealth is spread all the way down to the lowest rungs on the societal ladder. This socialistic domestic policy is often frowned upon in Washington. The disagreement with America's societal model is why there is so much resentment toward U.S. power politics abroad. Other states simply do not like the idea of the United States attempting to reshape the world in its image.

These disagreements are why the United States should not be following such an intense foreign policy. Until America is able to convince the world of the superiority of the U.S. societal model, it has no business performing "regime change" in countries it dislikes. If it continues to ignore the world's objections, then the U.S. will only create more and more resentment. Growing resentment, which is increasing at alarming rates, held towards the United States, will only work to damage the future of U.S. global success.

According to the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, in their "What the World Thinks in 2002" poll, resentment toward the United States grew tremendously between 1999/2000 and 2002. In 19 of the 27 countries polled, attitudes toward the United States fell. In Muslim majority countries, America's image plummeted. All across Latin and South America, views toward the United States eroded in these last two years. The largest change was in Argentina, where many Argentineans blame U.S. dominated financial institutions for their current economic demise. In 1999/2000, 50 percent of Argentineans had a favorable view of the United States, compared to just 34 percent now, a drop of 16 percent. Germany, whose population used to have a 78 percent approval rating of the United States, has seen a 17 percent drop in positive attitudes toward the United States. Even Great Britain, one of America's staunchest allies, saw an 8 percent drop in favorable attitudes toward the United States.

This trend cannot be taken lightly. It embodies the failure of the U.S. to convince the world of the superiority of its societal model. This failure will mean that other states will not be inclined to work within the United States' form of world order; it means that other states will attempt to compete with the U.S. model. Possible results of this failure are a reemergence of European nationalism, this time within the confines of the European Union, or it could mean that China will work to increase its military to a size capable of threatening U.S. hegemony in Asia. Either way, if subsequent U.S. administrations continue to pursue power politics at the expense of international institutions, a major conflict will be hard to avoid.


*****************

[Ash Pulcifer is a U.S. based analyst of international conflicts and is also a human rights activist. While he does not justify or accept the killing of civilians in warfare, he attempts to understand why groups or governments resort to such means in order to achieve their strategic objectives.]

Ash Pulcifer encourages your comments: apulcifer@YellowTimes.org

YellowTimes.org is an international news and opinion publication. YellowTimes.org encourages its material to be reproduced, reprinted, or broadcast provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source, http://www.YellowTimes.org. Internet web links to http://www.YellowTimes.org are appreciated.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news