Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Dennis Hans: Sixteen Dishonest Words

Sixteen Dishonest Words:


And yes, they’re dishonest even if we concede all the points Rice and Rummy made on the Sunday talk shows
By Dennis Hans

If you’re scratching your head and wondering how the Bush administration had such an easy time persuading much of the news media of the necessity to wage war on Iraq, simply look at their performance over the weekend.

The big issue was those suddenly controversial 16 words from the State of the Union (SOTU) address, and many journalists proved themselves to be not only ignorant — e.g., not knowing enough about WMD evidence to expose the many other false or misleading assertions in the speech — but stupid.

Ignorance and stupidity are not the same. Ignorance means lacking in knowledge. I for one don’t know squat about stem cells, so on that topic I am happily ignorant.

Stupidity, on the other hand, suggests a poorly functioning brain. If I was fascinated by stem cells and read everything on the topic, yet none of it stuck, I’d chalk it up to stupidity.

Words are journalists’ stock in trade. If they have trouble grasping the meaning of simple ones such as “learn,” we have a brain problem — one that a cynical administration is all too willing to exploit.

Read carefully the 16 words in the January 28 SOTU address: “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

Now read the statement in the September 24 dossier from whence the SOTU sentence came ( http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page275.asp):

“Iraq’s known holdings of processed uranium are under IAEA supervision. But there is intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

Okay, journalists, here’s your big chance to redeem yourselves. Forget for a moment the important question of whether or not the administration was trying to slyly mislead the public by citing the British as believers of an allegation the Bush team doubted. Our test strictly concerns the meaning of words:

How does the wording in the U.S. formulation differ from the Brits’?

If you said, “It’s a paraphrase with essentially the same meaning,” then I’ve got my own war I’d like to sell you.

Bush’s speechwriters, guided by officials of the National Security Council and the CIA, didn’t accurately paraphrase the passage. They IMPROVED on it.

The Brits offered a vague, weak construction: “there is intelligence.” “Intelligence” is not to be confused with “confirmation,” “airtight evidence” or “proof.” If the past year has taught us anything, it is that “intelligence” about Iraq presented by the U.K. or U.S. is not to be confused with established fact. Yet the SOTU construction — “The British government has learned” — tells the viewer that our most trusted ally KNOWS that Saddam “recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

The Brits knew — and know — no such thing. We can take them at their word and say they “believe” that Saddam recently sought uranium. But they no more “learned” that than they “learned” the Iraqis had missiles that could be launched in 45 minutes and deliver WMD all the way to Cyprus.

Dame Pauline Neville-Jones, former chairperson of Britain’s Joint Intelligence Committee, analyzed this matter at length in an essay for the July 13 edition of The Independent. Here’s her key point: “Assessed intelligence is not the same as ‘facts’ and should not be treated as such. I doubt it should be called ‘evidence.’” ( http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=423967)

It’s possible, though not bloody likely, that the Brits’ intelligence will prove to be genuine proof. But such proof will not change the fact that Bush’s January 28 SOTU address misrepresented the dossier, and that for the next six months America’s trusting and dimwitted journalists failed to figure it out and blow the whistle.

That journalistic stupidity, coupled with naïve faith in the integrity of the president and his senior advisers, guarantees that the administration will continue its standard practice of “positive misrepresentation” and “ambiguity elimination” in the guise of accurate paraphrasing.

# # #

©2003 by Dennis Hans

Bio: Dennis Hans is a freelance writer who has taught courses in mass communications and American foreign policy at the University of South Florida-St. Petersburg. Prior to the Iraq war he published “Lying Us Into War: Exposing Bush and His ‘Techniques of Deceit’” ( http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/02/12_lying.html) and “The Disinformation Age” ( http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0303/S00011.htm). He can be reached at HANS_D@popmail.firn.edu


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news