Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Australia's Banning Of LeT Raises More Questions

Australia's Banning Of LeT Raises More Questions Than It Answers


by Amir Butler

The recalling of the senate for a special session on Friday, November 5th, to rush through legislation banning the group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) raises more questions than it answers.

For most Australians this is the first time they are hearing of this group – and with good reason. LeT is the military wing of the Pakistani-based educational and social services organization, Markaz Da’wah wa’l Irshad. It was formed in 1989 by Abdul Wahid Kashmiri and consists almost entirely of Pakistanis and Kashmiris. Since the 1990s, the military wing has been fighting a battle against Indian forces in the disputed territory of Kashmir with the sole objective of achieving independence and autonomy for the mostly-Muslim Kashmiri people.

Unlike other groups, LeT is characterised by its focus entirely on military targets in the Jammu-Kashmir region. LeT have never attacked Western interests nor expressed any animosity towards Australia. In 2000, the LeT leader, Professor Hafiz Muhammad Sayyid, told reporters from the American ABC network, that LeT has “no interest in fighting American since America is not fighting the Muslims and this is the ruling of the Koran”. He went on to say that “Lashkar-e-Taiba is engaged in fighting against the occupying Indian army in Jammu and Kashmir” and is fighting for the “rights of all oppressed human beings: Muslim, Sikh, Buddhist, even Hindu”.

It is possible that some members of LeT have had contact with al-Qaeda, although in the same ABC interview, Professor Sayyid went to lengths to explain that LeT has no organization affiliation or tie with Usama Bin Laden and that “our organization is not involved, nor has it even been involved, in any activities in America or East Africa.” He went on to repudiate the methodology of al-Qaeda, saying, “We condemn all acts of violence against civilians and those who commit such acts, whether Muslim or non-Muslim. Islam does not allow the killing of peaceful, innocent, unarmed civilians”.

There is a clear ideological distinction between LeT and al-Qaeda. LeT, for example, have demonstrated a willingness to speak out against Muslim terrorism and extremist behaviour. On Christmas Eve, 2000, LeT issued a communiqué to their followers and supporters explicitly condemning the attacks on Indonesia’s Christian minority that were taking place at the time. Abu Umar, the group’s Director of Foreign Affairs, wrote, “These bombings are a horrific and inhuman assault on innocent civilians who gathered solely for the sake of worship”. Rebuking those who carried out the attacks, he wrote, “the goal of the criminals who carried out these attacks was to tarnish the religion of Islam and cause the further deterioration of relations between Muslims and Christians. Whoever they are, the bombers are doing the work of the enemies of Islam”.

When 36 Sikh villagers were murdered in Jammu-Kashmir in 2000, LeT issued a communiqué lamenting their deaths as a “tragedy” that has only damaged “the Islamic struggle for justice”.

In the aftermath of September 11, LeT were amongst the first Islamic groups to publicly condemn the attack and clarify Islam’s opposition to such attacks on civilians and innocents.

The reason most frequently given in the West for opposition to LeT is their alleged involvement in the terrorist attack on the Indian parliament. However, this allegation has never been proven and seems contrary to the position that LeT have consistently articulated for several years through regular communiqués and articles.

Given its history, it is difficult to see the threat that a Kashmiri independence group poses to Australian security; especially a group that has condemned anti-Western violence and has never attacked or opposed any Western interest. The decision of the government to ban LeT seems driven more by politics than any pragmatic need to protect Australians from impending danger. The threat of LeT is a Trojan horse for the Attorney-General to push for increased ASIO powers and usurp further our civil liberties.

It is a fact that in our multicultural society, many ethnic Australians retain support for various causes and struggles in their old countries. For instance, many Turkish Kurds have supported intellectually and materially the PKK; many Irish Australians provided support for the IRA’s struggle for independence from British rule; and many Tamil Australians continue to support the struggle of their people for an independent homeland in Sri Lanka. In the past, many Australians supported the struggle of the Timorese people to gain independence from Indonesia.

It is the pinnacle of injustice that a government should then outlaw support for one cause, but tolerate and even encourage support for another based purely on political expediency. Governments must either demonstrate the specific threat that a movement or cause poses to security, or ban support for all independence and secessionist struggles – regardless of whether these causes may enjoy the temporal support of the government and her allies.

**********

Amir Butler is executive director of the Australian Muslim Public Affairs Committee (AMPAC). He can be contacted at abutler@muslimaffairs.com.au.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news