Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Meditations: Reflections on Chomsky's Perspective

Meditations (Politics) - From Martin LeFevre in California

Reflections on Chomsky's Perspective

There are two parts to Noam Chomsky's latest book, " Hegemony or Survival ." There is the bulk of the book, in which he gives as scathing analysis of American foreign policy. And then there is the tantalizing opening and disappointing conclusion, in which he skates over the deepest questions of human existence.

Chomsky begins with philosophical promise, musing on the frequency and fate of so-called intelligent species in the universe. He cites biologist Ernst Mayr, who estimated the average lifespan of species with "the kind of intelligence needed to establish a civilization" at 100,000 years. Chomsky adds that humans are refuting the notion that it's "better to be smart than stupid." Humankind, he says, looks like a "biological error."

The rest of "Hegemony or Survival" is devoted to an in-depth political examination of the aims and trajectory of American power since World War II. Few informed citizens of America or elsewhere would argue with his devastating critique.

But there is a disconnect between the philosophical questions Chomsky introduces with humankind's "assault on the environment that sustains lifeŠand with cold and calculated savagery, on each other as well," and the purely political analysis he offers.

Chomsky is smart enough to know that the issues go far beyond American hegemony (as irrefutable politically as it is), but not philosophical enough to speak to that dimension (much less the spiritual one). He is a meticulous researcher and first-rate logician. But his ideas lack wide emotional appeal, since they speak from and to the head rather than the heart.

A few weeks ago I was pleased to turn on the Charlie Rose Show, the most respected talk show in America, and find that Noam Chomsky was to be interviewed for the full hour. Rose opened by saying that he had received huge amounts of mail urging him to have Chomsky as a guest.

The interview however, was unsatisfying, and left one feeling breathless. Charlie Rose is an interviewer dying to interview himself. But still, Chomsky went on with unnecessary detail in an effort to convince Rose of the veracity of his claims. He apparently believes a surfeit of documentation and logic can substitute for a dearth of expressiveness and feeling.

The book rouses, but it also leaves me hungering for something more. I think Chomsky recognizes this, and that's why he pasted questions posed by the human conundrum onto an analysis of US hegemony.

Chomsky's basic premise is virtually undeniable‹that "hegemony is more important than survival." And he is dead right in saying that "destroying hope is a critically important project" for the Bush Administration.

But his hope in the "second superpower of world public opinion" is a false one. That alone will not allow people "to escape the containment to which [we are being] subjected." The irony is that Chomsky's logic of power is escape-proof. Follow it all the way, and there is no hope.

The book leaves one dangling with a glancing reflection on whether Bush is another in the "passing nightmare of Neros, Genghis Khans, and Hitlers," as Bertrand Russell put it. Chomsky finishes with Russell's idea that, "in time the earth will become again incapable of supporting life, and peace will return." That may give comfort to hard-core misanthropes, but it does nothing for people with hearts still beating in their chests.

The sheer destructiveness of humans makes the strongest case that something more than a 100,000-year flameout is going on here. To stand on the brink has two meanings--one implying the abyss, the other implying momentous change.

With humans, as no other creature, the outer is the manifestation of the inner. Therein lies the hope.


- Martin LeFevre is a contemplative, and non-academic religious and political philosopher. He has been publishing in North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe (and now New Zealand) for 20 years. Email: The author welcomes comments.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news