Comment & Opinion | Book Reviews | Car Reviews | Daily News Summaries | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Unanswered Questions | More Categories

 


Richard Walrath: GDP And Me

GDP And Me


By Richard Walrath

At some point, all these numbers have to translate into something that can be either verified or denounced as false. For almost four years now, we have heard almost every month how the economy is picking up steam, how productivity is up, GDP is growing by leaps and bounds, and corporations are making tons of money.

That last bit about corporations making tons of money is true--business profits are the highest they have been since 1929, according to Paul Krugman, an economist who writes for the NYT, and he should know.

But what was the GDP in the year 2000? What was it in the year 2003, and how much is it going to be in the year 2004? And, more to the point, how did it get divided up? If you didn't get any, or very little of it, what difference does it make to you what the GDP was?

Just for a quick thumb-nail sketch of what the GDP means to you, Robert Reich, Clinton's Secretary of Labor, has done the arithmetic and comes up with the figure of $30,000 for every man, woman and child in this country IF GDP were to be divided equally.

GDP--Gross Domestic Product-- is the sum of all goods and services produced in an economy in one year.

Now we all know that that's not how we divide things up in this country. There are the rich, the poor, and those of us who are sandwiched in between. The rich get theirs off the top, the poor scrape theirs off the bottom, and those left in the middle continue to get smaller and smaller.

But let's take a typical family of five - mother, father, and three children. GDP, divided equally, would mean a household income of $150,000! How many families do you know of with three children in a household with an income of $150,000?

The chances are very good that your answer is--none. The median household income is now not much above $40,000, and has dropped in the last three years, rather than increase.

Median, you will remember, means the mid-point--half of the households are above the median, and half are below.

What's the point of all this? A very simple one -- it makes no difference to you how much productivity is up, how much GDP is up, or how much business profits are up, if you are not getting any of the benefit.

The next time you read or hear those glowing numbers about the economy, just ask yourself these questions--

How is this benefiting my family?
What am I getting out of all this?
What are these increases in GDP doing for me?

******************

© 2004 Richard Walrath

Richard Walrath is a freelance writer and CAO of Articles and Answers. Visit us online at http://www.articlesandanswers.com


 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

John Minto: Hone Harawira - Speaking Truth To Power

John Minto writes: None of this should need to be said but the reaction of so many to Harawira's angry email resembles the deeply embedded racism which Don Brash tapped into so successfully a few years back at Orewa. More >>

Damien Baker: Profits Mask Food Shortages in a Land of Plenty

The petroleum industry arrived in the Lake Kutubu area, around 20 years ago with Chevron and BP and soon the delicate ecological balance often in play in remote areas began to shift. More >>

The Israeli Exception: Gilo And East Jerusalem

In 1987, the conservative author Midge Decter described her association with Israel and those willing to place it above conventional judgment. ‘We know ourselves to be bound by ties so deep, so essential, so unconditional, that they are beyond daylight... More >>

Gordon Campbell: The 9/11 Terrorists On Trial

For years, human rights advocates have argued that terrorism is essentially criminal behaviour, and terrorists should therefore be tried under the rules of due process that democratic states have developed over centuries for dealing fairly with crime... More >>

Paul Buchanan: The Strategic Utility of Terrorism (and why jihadism is losing)

A Word From Afar: Paul Buchanan writes: One of the axioms of counter-terrorism is that the nastiness of the atrocity is inversely proportional to the terrorist’s chances of success. That is to say, the worse the act, then less likely that terrorist... More >>

East Timor: The Role Of Journalists In The Freedom Struggle

The struggle for justice is not a contest between Indonesians and non-Indonesians. Rather, it is a contest between those around the world who want to justice to prevail and those who want to see impunity prevail... More >>

Globalization Unchecked: How Alien Media is Suffocating Real Culture

A Muslim family sits across of me in café, in a largely Muslim Asia country. An older woman shyly hunches over and desperately trying to avoid eye contact with the giant plasma screen TV, blazing loud music on the popular music video channel, MTV. ... More >>

Martin LeFevre: Falling Leaves, and Squirrels

One is so accustomed to seeing the gray squirrels in the parkland leap from branch to branch with perfect dexterity that it came as quite a shock to see one miss his mark and fall into the creek. More >>

MOST READ HEADLINES

More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
powered by newsagent
NZ independent news