Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Opinion: Stop Equating Activism With Absolutism

Stop Equating Activism With Absolutism

By Krishna Singh Bam

SEVEN leading political parties in Nepal have joined hands in an effort to restore their version of democracy. Their agenda includes the reinstatement of the House of Representatives dissolved in 2002 as a prerequisite to settling the nine-year Maoist rebellion, which has claimed over 11,000 lives.

The alliance has its priorities wrong. Their agenda presumes that the monarchy is responsible for Nepal’s current crisis. It does precious little in terms of addressing the core demands of the Maoists: a roundtable conference of all political forces, an interim government and election to a constituent assembly that would draft a new republican constitution. How resurrecting a house duly dissolved by an elected prime minister – a decision endorsed by the Supreme Court – could democratize the kingdom defies logic.

The Maoists, on the other hand, have stepped up their murderous wave of terror against the people without articulating how their goal of establishing a republic would benefit a multicultural and multilingual nation. As the custodian of Nepalese nationhood, King Gyanendra could not have stood back and allowed the systematic undermining of the country's sovereignty, nationalism and democracy by a political class wedded to appeasing its insatiable desires. His decision to take over full executive powers on February 1 must be seen for what it was: an unpleasant yet necessary step to save Nepal from total collapse.

Efforts at perpetuating the fiction that the monarchy in Nepal somehow owes its existence to the magnanimity of political parties have done enough harm to the country. The crown's traditional leadership role cannot be constricted by the specious argument that it would conflict with the principles of multiparty democracy. Such an effort is doubly deplorable when the elected representatives themselves are to blame for the current national malaise.

From the outset, leaders of the People's Movement of 1990 – which culminated in the restoration of multiparty democracy after 30 years of partyless rule -- sought to project the restoration of organized political activity as a defeat for the king. Every step of the way, the palace's valuable suggestions on ways of strengthening multiparty democracy, especially during the process of drawing up a new constitution, were uniformly denounced as part of a "reactionary conspiracy".

Three Ms -- money, muscle and manipulation -- gripped the three parliamentary elections Nepal held since the restoration of multiparty democracy in 1990. No parliament was allowed to complete its full five-year tenure. The countdown to a government’s collapse began the moment it took office. Such activities stood in the way of a genuine expression of the people's will. In their quest to gain and retain power, multiparty leaders turned the system into a third-rate political-bureaucratic-criminal network. Worse, they tried to foist it on the country in the name of governance by consent.

The holier-than-thou attitude of the Nepali Congress and the Unified Marxist Leninists negated the fact that the People's Movement had brought together people of all professions and persuasions in a quest for change that had swept across the world following the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was only a matter of time that the haughtiness of the two main political parties alienated so many participants of the movement and those who worked for the transition to multiparty democracy.

Instead of setting out to curb the palace’s powers, it is time for Nepalese political leaders to accept the futility of trying to marginalize the crown.

Specifically, they must stop equating an active monarchy with absolutism and should help ensure that Nepal benefits from King Gyanendra’s wide experience in domestic and international affairs acquired under the reign of his father and brother. The monarch’s roadmap for reactivating the democratic process requires the support of all forces. Beginning with municipal elections, scheduled to be held within a year, all political parties must shoulder equal responsibility to institutionalize popular rule.

Then there is the broader constitutional issue that must be resolved. Once the mainstream parties have accepted the king as the head of state and the symbol of its unity and permanence, they must recognize that he must be able to arbitrate and moderate the regular functioning of state institutions. If the monarch believes he needs more political space to discharge responsibilities entrusted by history and tradition, then why not at least foster discussions within a broader framework?

Perhaps writing the functions and jurisdiction of the king into a new constitution and the laws more explicitly could help create a more enabling state.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news