Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Nepal: Twelve Point Letter of Understanding!

Nepal: Twelve Point Letter of Understanding!


By Bhupal Lamichhaney

The 12-Point Letter of Understanding between the Seven Party Alliance and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) may be shock and awe to many but for those closely watching Nepal's political development in the context of the Maoist insurgency, it is not surprising.

Nepal's relationship with India has been present from time immemorial, sometimes obvious and other times not, yet always there. Any kind of political change in Nepal is ever influenced by Indian policy. For students of her modern political history, the important years according to the Nepalese calendar are 2007 (1951), 2017 (1961), 2036(1981), 2046 (1990), and 2062 (2005).

During those years, significant political changes occurred. Some years are considered as positive for Nepali people and some are not. However, in all these years, New Delhi played either a vibrant or a subtle role. The 12-Point Letter of Understanding unveiled on November 22, 2005 is no exception.

In keeping with past tradition, New Delhi at this time has come out openly in wider consultation to overcome the present crisis in the Himalayan Kingdom. It has included all stakeholders in Nepal's conflict, except the King and the Chinese envoy to Kathmandu.

The national stakeholders in Nepal's conflict are the Monarch himself, the parliamentary political parties, and the Maoists. These three are the prime stakeholders as well as the vital actors in the conflict. However, there is one vibrant stakeholder that gained substantial strength after the 2046(1990) mass movement which brought democracy to the country, the civil society of Nepal. Truly, the more civil society is active in defending their liberties the more democracy flourishes.

There are international stakeholders in Nepal as well, especially two giant neighboring countries, rapidly expanding their economic powers, India and China. Both these diverse countries play a significant role in the political development within the Kingdom. The others are the US, the UK and the EU.

Nepal is situated in such a geographical location, she is essential to maintain a balance in the geopolitical scenario of present day South Asia. India and China both know the importance of Nepal in maintaining their own national interests. The stake of both countries is high regarding Nepal because of volatile political issues like Tibet, Kashmir, and the growth of Terrorism in the Himalayas.

After 9/11, traditional political relations in South Asia changed dramatically as the presence of the United States and its allies became a reality in Afghanistan. US presence has created differing opinions in neighboring Asian countries regarding their own national security. The active role of President Bush in promoting democracy worldwide has made the region's non-democratic governments nervous and suspicious, including Nepal’s. The result is substantial polarization between the South Asian governments.

In addition, the dynamics of the Nepal’s conflict has made her key political actors think twice about finding a peaceful solution. The growing concern regarding international polarization on Nepal's political issues along with US lead coalition in the region has made the Maoist insurgents and the political parties come closer to resolve their differences, and the regional power India to act positively in finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Perhaps, China is also being consulted in the process. Whatever the international factors, the important actors are the leaders of Nepal for peaceful resolution of the conflict.

On 8/17/2005, Peace Journalism (www.peacejournalism.com) published my article entitled ‘Conflict, Peace and Political Conversion in Nepal'. That article indicated the coming change because of many reasons. I wrote, “However, the main factor for the political conversion is the realization of the mistakes that are leading the country into chaos and the need of correction for the greater interest of the nation rather than hold to petty party interest. In the history of many nations, the political leaders have chosen the difficult path of national interest for the sake of the people and the country. The situation of Nepal is now so critical that one mistake from a key prejudicial political player could lead the people to a nation less status. The bitter experience of statelessness of the Palestine people is surely known to the youthful learned leaders of the Maoist party. Once the country is lost, where will they establish their ideological Shangri-La?"

Now the 12-Point Letter of Understanding categorically states in articles 6 and 7, “Undertaking self criticism and self evaluation of past mistakes, the CPN (Maoist) has expressed commitment not to repeat such mistakes in future. The seven political parties, undertaking self evaluation, have expressed commitment not to repeat the mistakes of the past which were committed while in parliament and in government."

When we study Nepal's political development in this regard, we clearly find the realization process began after the seven parties came to consensus. This led to the 12-Point Letter of Understanding. The remaining force to come to consensus seems to be the King. Once the King realizes that his interests and the interests of the nation at large are at stake, he must accept conversion from his 21st century active monarchy to a true constitutional one as the Maoists have done in accepting multiparty democracy.

The 12-Point Letter of Understanding will be an easy way for the Monarch to come to an agreement with all political parties including the Maoists by reestablishing the dissolved Parliament so that a new all party government can be formed. This will disarm the Maoists and lead the country in transition to peace and democracy without further senseless blood shed.

End

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news