Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Burma Boasts At UN Of Big Northern Friends

Burma Boasts At UN Of Big Northern Friends

by Richard S. Ehrlich

BANGKOK, Thailand -- Dragged by the U.S. into the United Nations Security Council for critical examination, Burma responded on Tuesday (September 19) by boasting that China, Russia and other "friendly nations" will protect Burma's military regime from stronger UN intervention.

The U.S. on Friday (September 15) arranged for Burma, also known as Myanmar, to be placed on the UN Security Council's agenda for discussion, amid hopes the move would pressure the biggest country in mainland Southeast Asia to become a democracy.

In unprecedented international action against Burma, the UN Security Council agreed with Washington, voting 10-4 to schedule the impoverished, repressive country for discussion.

China and Russia, along with Qatar and the Congo, voted against the move, indicating Beijing and Moscow would use their permanent membership in the UN's Security Council to prevent Burma's case moving forward to a more serious "resolution" vote, which could have resulted in direct UN intervention.

The United States, Britain, France, Japan, Denmark, Greece, Slovakia, Argentina, Peru and Ghana voted to discuss Burma. Tanzania abstained.

U.S. President George W. Bush hopes UN criticism of Burma will help force a regime change, and free more than 1,000 political prisoners, including Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi who is under house arrest.

"This a major step forward for President Bush's effort to bring to the attention of the international community the situation inside Burma," which is a "threat to international peace and security," U.S. Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said.

Though Washington was unable to bring Burma to a resolution vote, its placement for discussion by the Security Council is a blow to the unelected military junta.

"Putting Myanmar on the [UN] agenda means allowing the [UN Security] Council just to discuss the matter, and it is not meant for allowing it to take action against the country," said a defensive, 4,400-word "Stance of Government" statement, published in Burma's official New Light of Myanmar newspaper on Tuesday (September 19).

Referring to China and Russia, it said "Myanmar's friendly nations among the permanent members" will "oppose the efforts" of the United States to call for a resolution vote.

The military, which has ruled Burma since 1962, said Washington used money, and political muscle, to score votes from countries not on the Security Council.

"In the procedural voting at the UN Security Council, the USA pressured alternate member countries politically and economically, and persuaded them with international aid.

"Even Japan -- which has been traditionally friendly to Myanmar, and had declared that it would not accept the attempts of the USA to put Myanmar on the agenda -- has changed its stance under the pressure of the USA. It is regrettable," the regime's statement said.

"Alternate member countries, which hold the correct view that Myanmar's affairs are just internal affairs posing no threat to international peace and security, changed their stance under the pressure of the USA," it said.

"No one is detained for political reasons in Myanmar," the regime insisted, denying extensive reports by the U.S. State Department, New York-based Human Rights Watch, London-based Amnesty International and other monitors.

Mrs. Suu Kyi, the world's most famous political prisoner, has spent 11 of the past 16 years under house arrest in the capital, Rangoon, and will not be freed until the military considers her pacified and obedient.

"She has constantly been demanding confrontation, defiance of all orders, utter devastation, resorting to sanctions, and reliance on external elements, all of which will lead to harming the national unity, national stability, and national development, as well as hindering the democratization process.

"Thus, she was restricted at home under section 10 (B) of the 'Law Safe-Guarding the State From the Danger of Destructive Elements'," it said.

Despite being occasionally freed and then locked up again, Mrs. Suu Kyi has never been put on trial and no date has been set for her next release.

The military fears her immense popularity could cause another attempted "people's power" insurrection, similar to the one in 1988 which was crushed by the regime, which killed at least 1,000 pro-democracy protestors.

In 1990, while she was detained, Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party won a nationwide parliamentary election, but the military ignored their victory and refused to relinquish control.

Norway's Nobel Committee awarded Mrs. Suu Kyi its 1991 Peace Prize. The European Parliament gave her the 1991 Sakharov prize for human rights.

Mrs. Suu Kyi, however, is a "traitor" who helps Burmese "terrorists" and others who are secretly supported by Washington, which wants to install a "puppet government," and "station military bases in the territory of Myanmar," the regime's statement said.

"Myanmar, which shares borders with two giant countries, becomes crucial in its [U.S.] strategy for Asia," it said, noting Burma's commercially-friendly borders with China and India, in addition to sharing lucrative frontiers with Bangladesh, Laos and Thailand.


Copyright by Richard S. Ehrlich, who has reported news from Asia for the past 28 years, and is co-author of the non-fiction book of investigative journalism, "HELLO MY BIG BIG HONEY!" Love Letters to Bangkok Bar Girls and Their Revealing Interviews. His web page is

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news