Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Freeman & Bleifuss: A Way to Restore Confidence

A Way to Restore Confidence


By Steven F. Freeman and Joel Bleifuss
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel & Truthout.org
Monday 30 October 2006

Widespread concern over recent reports from Princeton University on Diebold machine susceptibility to tampering, and from New York University on e-voting more generally, confirm what computer scientists have long known and contended: There is little reason for confidence in election results obtained from electronic voting machines.

Yet voters in the United States are denied the one powerful technique that might restore confidence in election results - an independent exit poll.

In next week's midterm elections, 90 percent of Americans will vote on electronic touch-screen voting machines or optical-scan systems. According to a 2005 study by the Government Accountability Office, these systems have inherent flaws that "could allow unauthorized personnel to disrupt operations or modify data and programs that are critical to ... the integrity of the voting process."

Three companies - Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia - control 80 percent of the nation's voting and tabulating machines. These companies that we entrust with our franchise operate without public oversight. The software in machines of all three companies are proprietary, and when voters faced with surprising election results have sued to examine the machines, elections officials have claimed they are prohibited by contract from allowing inspection.

In response to concerns about electronic voting, Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Chris Dodd, D-Conn., recently introduced the Confidence in Voting Act, which according to Boxer "urges local jurisdictions to make paper ballots available at every polling place, so any voter who wants one can use one."

Such legislation would not have been enough. Given the lack of a reliable means of counting these votes, systematically auditing those counts and securing ballots in case of dispute, America must support an alternative means of checking the veracity of the official count.

A public, transparent exit poll is just such an alternative.

Around the world, exit polls - surveys of how voters immediately upon leaving the polling place say they have voted - are used to verify the integrity of elections. In nations with reliable voting systems, such as Britain and Germany, exit poll results are within 1 or 2 percentage points of the official numbers.

Discrepancies between exit polls and the official count have generally been understood to indicate corrupted counts. In four nations - Serbia, Peru, Georgia and Ukraine - they have been used to successfully overturn election results. In each case, subsequent elections, re-run with more secure voting systems, have borne out the initial poll results.

In the words of John Tefft, former deputy assistant secretary of state and current ambassador to Georgia, exit polls are "one of the few means to expose large-scale fraud." And that is why the United States funds them in emerging democracies.

Unfortunately, although exit polls were invented in the United States and are vigorously promoted for elections abroad, here they are nonfunctional as a means of election verification.

The 2004 national exit poll was conducted for a consortium of the major news groups (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX and AP) and was designed to be used by the media in forecasting and commentary - rather than by citizens for election verification.

This was made clear by the pollsters' response to the nationwide 7 percentage point discrepancy between the exit polls and the official count in the 2004 presidential election. In their subsequent report, the Evaluation of Edison/Mitofsky, the pollsters did not include precinct-level data, which the media consortium refused to release. We only know of the discrepancy - one which represents 9 million votes - because a technical glitch prevented the pollsters from promptly uploading "corrected" results, that is, results adjusted to conform to the official count.

In 2006 and future elections, the exit pollsters have stated that they will not release "corrected" results even to their media clients. Of course, once data are "corrected," they are no longer true exit poll results; rather, they accord an unwarranted legitimacy upon the official numbers.

Unlike exit polls that we are used to seeing on election night, a transparent exit poll would not be designed to predict and analyze election results in a hurry. Instead, this poll could be designed from the ground up to check on the validity of election results.

Rigorous statistical design would separate bias in the polling from errors in the count. Such a survey could also resolve specific allegations of fraud in political jurisdictions and with voting technologies known to have a history of irregularities. The entire process - survey design, raw data and all analysis - would be open to public scrutiny.

Like the rest of the world, Americans deserve to know when voting machines have not yielded accurate counts and when an election may have been tampered with. We deserve elections that are run fairly and that inspire our confidence. Until our state and federal governments provide a voting system that we can trust, a public exit poll - open and transparent and publicly funded - would provide our best assurance of fair elections.

*************

Steven F. Freeman is a visiting scholar in survey methods at the University of Pennsylvania and is co-author with Joel Bleifuss of Was the 2004 Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Charlotte Graham: I OIA'd Every Council In NZ...

A “no surprises” mindset and training and advice that has taught public servants to see any media interaction as a “gotcha” exercise perpetrated by unscrupulous and scurrilous reporters has led to a polarised and often unproductive OIA process. More>>

ALSO:

Veronika Meduna: The Kaikoura Rebuild

A Scoop Foundation Investigation The South Island’s main transport corridor will be open to traffic again, more than a year after a magnitude 7.8 earthquake mangled bridges and tunnels, twisted rail tracks and buried sections of the road under massive landslides. More>>

Charlotte Graham: Empowering Communities To Act In A Disaster
The year of record-breaking natural disasters means that in the US, as in New Zealand, there’s a conversation happening about how best to run the emergency management sector... More>>

ALSO:

Campbell On: The attacks on Lorde, over Israel
The escalation of attacks on Lorde for her considered decision not to perform in Israel is unfortunate, but is not entirely unexpected…More

Jan Rivers: The New Zealanders Involved In Brexit

There are a number who have strong connections to New Zealand making significant running on either side of the contested and divisive decision to leave the European Union. More>>

Rawiri Taonui: The Rise, Fall And Future Of The Independent Māori Parties

Earlier this month the Māori Party and Mana Movement reflected on the shock loss of their last parliamentary seat in this year’s election. It is timely to consider their future. More>>

Using Scoop Professionally? Introducing ScoopPro

ScoopPro is a new offering aimed at ensuring professional users get the most out of Scoop and support us to continue improving it so that Scoop continues to exist as a public service for all New Zealanders. More>>

ALSO: