Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

David Swanson: Machines Can’t Be Trusted

Machines can’t be trusted to get elections right

By David Swanson
C'ville Weekly

How can we be sure our votes in the February 12 primaries were properly counted? We can trust and hope, but we cannot be certain. Charlottesville uses DRE voting machines (Directly Recording Electronic voting machines). While the city brags that these are not touch-screen machines, because we turn a dial instead of touching a screen, the problems are the same. The machines we use have produced noticeable errors in some places around the country, such as displaying on the final page for confirmation different selections from those the voter had made. But the major danger lies in the unnoticeable.

They use the same machines in Houston, where a Rice University professor asked half his class to hack into one and leave no trace, and the other half to try to detect the hacking. About half the time the changes to the software were able to shift the results without being detected. And there’s no way for any precinct that uses these machines to know that they haven’t been hacked. The count at the end is what it is, and it may be right or wrong, but there’s no way to check it. Yes, election workers can be the best-intentioned and most diligent souls on the face of the earth (and most of them are), and they can keep the machines under constant surveillance, but—given the secret nature of the counting—how can they expect to convince losing candidates that they lost and suspicious voters that their votes were counted?

The Virginia State Constitution bans secret vote counting, but Virginia’s legislature allows the use of DREs. This is a problem that should be addressed in court. If there is a case underway, I haven’t heard about it.

Instead, voting rights activists in Virginia can celebrate that the legislature has banned the purchase of any more DREs by localities. And advocacy groups are pushing new legislation that would permit and mandate recounts of paper ballots counted by optical scan machines. Clearly this is a step in the right direction. However, the notion that optical scan machines are the way to go is likely to lead to many localities, including Albemarle and Charlottesville, trying to use their existing supply of DREs as long as possible, due to the financial cost of the optical scan machines. Those machines have had as many problems as DREs, and they are not a real solution.

The real answer is hand-counted paper ballots. This answer is not cost-free. Workers need to be hired and trained to properly handle the paper ballots, to count them publicly and immediately on site, and to properly record and store them. Until then, here is where the City of Charlottesville’s website asks us to place our faith:

“Q: How do I know that my vote has been cast and counted?

“A: Whenever a voter presses the CAST BALLOT button and the waving American flag appears, the vote is cast and counted.”

Wouldn’t it be nice if it were really that easy? In the past few elections and in recent primaries around the country, we’ve seen such problems as: precincts turning out more voters than exist (is 110 percent voter turnout an achievement in some people’s minds?), huge percentages of people voting in minor races but supposedly failing to vote at all in key contests, results that vary from unadjusted exit polls by unheard of margins, people forced to wait 12 hours to vote, people turned away in the general election who voted in the same location in the primaries, flyers advising Democrats to vote the day after the election, and dozens of other problems, most of them based in electronic voting machines, most—but definitely not all—of them swinging votes in favor of Republicans. How can we be sure Charlottesville is immune from fraud or error?

The new film, Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections, by David Earnhardt, tells the story of the 2004 and 2006 elections powerfully and convincingly. A free screening of the film with a discussion led by the filmmaker is planned for 7pm on February 21 at Sojourner’s Church in Charlottesville. Viewers will, I think, leave the screening with a very different view of recent history from the orthodox. The film presents evidence suggesting that the Democratic Party landslide in 2006 fell far short of what voters actually voted for, that George Bush has never once been elected president, and that the solution to the 2000 Florida debacle (the solution of buying electronic voting machines) took a relatively small problem and made it enormous. Uncounted is a nonpartisan take on the issue and presents evidence of Democratic fraud as well as Republican. Advocacy groups are pushing new legislation that would permit and mandate recounts of paper ballots counted by optical scan machines. Clearly this is a step in the right direction. It also suggests some solutions.

ENDS

**************

David Swanson is a Charlottesville resident and a board member of several organizations, including Voters for Peace. David Swanson is an organizer of the www.AfterDowningStreet.org coalition.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Scoop HiveMind Project: Universal Basic Income - Are We Up For It?

This is an opportunity for you as one of the 4 million potential funders and recipients of a Universal Basic Income to collectively consider the issue:
1. Is UBI is a desirable policy for New Zealand; and
2. How should a UBI system work in practice. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: National Announces Plan To Hit Youth With Big Mallets

The National party has announced its youth justice policy, which includes a controversial plan for recidivist serious youth offenders to be hit over the head with a comically large rubber mallet. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: This ->

It's been brought to my attention that Labour's new campaign slogan is "Let's do this". A collective call to action. A mission. I myself was halfway out of the couch before I realised I wasn't sure what it was I was supposed to do. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Hivemind Report: What New Zealanders Think About Affordable Housing

Ordinary citizens have had very few venues where they can debate and discuss as to what they believe has led to the crisis in affordable housing and how we might begin to address this. The HiveMind on affordable housing was about redressing the balance. More>>

ALSO:

New Hivemind Exploration: Opening The Election - Freshwater Quality

This is an opportunity for you as one of the 4 million guardians of our common water resources to help us find mutually agreeable solutions to the critical task of collectively managing these resources for health and sustainability. More>>

ALSO: