Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


A Word From Afar: Palin Frames the Race


A Word From Afar: Palin Frames the Race

A Word From Afar is a regular column that analyses political/strategic/international interest.

By Paul G. Buchanan

The introduction of Sarah Palin into the US presidential race has simplified the equation for victory. She has acquitted herself in her first mainstream media interviews, and she looks to be committed to the long haul. In doing so she has sharpened the lines of division between the two parties and raised the intensity of the campaign. She will be the decisive factor in the November elections, win or lose.

By nominating Governor Palin, the Republicans attacked the Democrat’s greatest source of electoral strength and, paradoxically, their major source of weakness: working women. With Hillary Clinton in the running for the Democratic nomination, or at least on the ticket as a Vice Presidential candidate, the Democrats could be assured of the working female vote. When she was defeated in the primaries and not offered (or did not accept) a place on the Democratic ticket, the field was opened to the Republicans. That is because working women come in many guises, which for the purposes of argument shall be dichotomized here into “liberals” and “conservatives”.

Nominating Sarah Palin capitalized on two sources of Democratic weakness that were a product of their own primary battles. They do not have a “hockey mum” nor do they have a Washington “outsider” on their ticket. Instead, they have two male US Senators, one new and the other old, as their candidates. Each has major liabilities—Joe Biden is the consummate insider and gaffe prone; Barack Obama has less than two years of national-level political experience. Conversely, although John McCain may indeed be old and part of the Washington scene, and Palin may be inexperienced in Washington ways, he reaffirmed his maverick reputation by choosing a moose-hunting first term female governor who is raising four children of school age (a fifth has just deployed to Iraq with the US Army), believes in biblical prophecy, the right to bear (several) arms and that abortion is a crime. She has an unwed pregnant daughter and a part time commercial fisherman, oil wildcatter, card-carrying union member husband who shoots things and rides snowmobiles for sport. With her selection McCain covered all of the Republican bases and added a magnet for disgruntled working women unhappy with Hillary Clinton’s dismissal from the presidential race.

Governor Palin’s selection as vice presidential candidate split the “working mum” vote. Conservative-minded (mostly white, but also Hispanic) working mums have flocked to her side, viscerally identifying with her success story in work/life balance while upholding traditional Judeo-Christian values. She places family on a par with career and meshes them well in concert with the man she married almost 30 years ago as a teenager.

Liberal working moms may find this story unconvincing, but the reality is that the Democrats have no counter to it. Hilary Clinton is seen as someone who put career first and whose family life reflects that choice. Conservative working women do not find semblance in her life. On issues of social policy, liberal women may not vote for Mrs. Palin, but they can only support Obama in numbers if he adopts Mrs. Clinton’s agenda. His attacks on her during the primary campaign and her absence on the ticket make that a difficult proposition. Moreover, attacking Governor Palin on her life choices and perceived inexperience is seen as petty, sexist and mean, which invites a potential backlash from undecided female voters.

It might well transpire that Governor Palin will come unstuck under the light of media scrutiny and partisan critiques of her public service record. Perhaps her socially conservative views will prove too much for many voters. Allegations of nepotism and personal malfeasance in the abuse of office have already surfaced against her. But in announcing her selection less than 60 days before the general election and keeping her media appearances to a select minimum, Republican campaign strategists can repudiate attacks on her record as “smears” born of partisan hatred and deep-rooted jealousy of a “real” working mum (unlike female Washington insiders such as Hillary Clinton and House Leader Nancy Pelosi). By the time any real truth surfaces on what Mrs. Palin did or did not do while in mayoral and Gubernatorial office, or what she really believes, the election will be over.

The genius in Governor Palin’s selection is that it reduces the contest for the Electoral College—the ultimate determinant of presidential elections short of the Supreme Court--to a handful of rural and semi-rural states in the US Midwest. The Electoral College vote is a winner-take all contest that disproportionately advantages rural states on a per-capita basis. This was the intention of the architects of the US federal election system, who distrusted the intelligence of the urban lower classes when confronting election year promises. They consequently designed a second tier ratification mechanism—the Electoral College—that gave more voting weight to rural constituencies than urban ones. Although urban states still have the largest numbers of voters and Electoral College votes, it is relatively under-populated states like Iowa, Nevada, Colorado, the Dakotas, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Missouri and New Mexico that in aggregate play a decisive role in determining the outcome of presidential contests. Ohio and Virginia also have much of these attributes (in terms of rural-urban distribution), although they have a higher urban concentration than the other electorates (in other words, the rural-urban balance is reversed). But the important point is that all of them are in play. That is the key to Republican success in 2008 because these are states in which many “hockey mums” and conservative working women reside, and are states whose voters have a visceral distaste for the federal government and the coastal elites that run, support and benefit from it.

The outcome elsewhere is decided: Blue (Democratic)-leaning states like New York, Massachusetts, Illinois and California will go to the Democrats and Red (Republican)-leaning states such as Arizona, Alabama, Texas and Idaho will go to the Republicans. The South and West tend to go Red and the Northeast and Mid Atlantic states lean Blue. At present count, the Obama/Biden ticket has a nominal 11 elector advantage over McCain/Palin (the Democrats have 238 electoral college votes to 227 for the Republicans).

Yet there are at least a dozen so-called “swing” states in which partisan preference is not certain. Virginia and Ohio are the most important of them, but with 50 Electoral College votes up for grabs (with the winning threshold being 270), most of them in rural and semi-rural states, the nomination of Sarah Palin has apparently tilted the race for the Electoral College vote in favour of the Republicans. That has forced the Democrats to reinvigorate their campaign efforts in swing states, and their focus is, like the Republicans, on middle aged, working females. It has come down to a race for that constituency.

Like 2000, the Republicans might lose the popular vote, but they will have the numbers in the Electoral College to secure victory if they win the majority of those undecided rural and semi-rural states. Working mums are a decisive component of the electorate in those states. Plus, they have a conservative Supreme Court as a trump card with which to adjudicate any disputes about the Electoral College vote. The outcome in 2000 (when the Electoral College went for George W. Bush while the popular vote favoured Al Gore) is a precedent in this regard.

The 2008 US presidential election is historic for many reasons. Not only is there an African-American vying for the presidency and a woman on the Republican ticket. Not only is the US at a crisis point in its political and economic development. The most historic aspect of this election is that for the first time it will be working women who decide the outcome no matter who wins. Whatever her flaws, we have Sarah Palin to thank for that.

Paul G. Buchanan studies comparative strategic thought. He was formerly an analyst and consultant to several US security agencies.

ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

David Swanson: Torture Is Mainstream Now

As Rebecca Gordon notes in her new book, Mainstreaming Torture, polls find greater support in the United States for torture now than when Bush was president. And it's not hard to see why that would be the case. More>>

Uri Avnery: In One Word: Poof!

Poor John Kerry. This week he emitted a sound that was more expressive than pages of diplomatic babble. In his testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations committee he explained how the actions of the Israeli government had torpedoed the “peace ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Poverty Incentive: Making The Poor Carry The Refugee Can

The poorer you are, the more likely you need to shoulder more. This axiomatic rule of social intercourse, engagement and daily living is simple and brutal enough: the poor shall hold, conserve, preserve. More>>

Nureddin Sabir: BBC Misreports John Kerry On Talks Failure

For once, US Secretary of State John Kerry was not mincing his words when he blamed Israel for the breakdown of talks with the Palestinians. But you would not have known this if you were following the story from the BBC News website. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Narendra Modi, And The Elections In India

On the upside, the gigantic election process that began yesterday in India is the largest exercise in democracy on the planet. Reportedly, a staggering five million people are employed, directly or indirectly, in the election process. The likely outcome is not quite so welcome... More>>

ALSO:

Ramzy Baroud: Kerry’s Looming Deadline And The Peace Process Industry

As the US-imposed April 29 deadline for a ‘framework’ agreement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority looms, time is also running out for the American administration itself. More>>

Harvey Wasserman: Fighting Our Fossil-Nuke Extinction

The 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez disaster has brought critical new evidence that petro-pollution is destroying our global ecosystem. The third anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown in Japan confirms that radioactive reactor ... More>>

Shobha Shukla: Rise In Global Health Financing, But Funding Priorities Shift

A new research done by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), at the University of Washington, indicates that globally the total development assistance for health (DAH) hit an all-time high of $31.3 billion in 2013 (a year-over-year ... More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
TEDxAuckland
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news