Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


QC spat gets Ugly

QC spat gets Ugly

There surely can be nothing less edifying than QCs fighting amongst themselves, with the Chief Justice and Attorney General in the middle. But can something good come from all this venom?

The ongoing debate over judicial specialisation has drawn into the Chief Justice Sian Elias and Attorney General Chris Finlayson into a vortex of venom on the NBR online website.The issue began with an attack on the judiciary by Tony Molloy QC, a long time advocate of judicial specialisation and commentator on matters judicial. Molloy's comments included references to the public being "shafted" by the manner in which the judiciary were being used by Chief Justice Elias, a long time opponent of judicial separation.

Molloy's colourful and disrespectful language referenced the fact that "mismatched" judges amounted to fraudulent behaviour, a comment that drew stinging criticism from Attorney General Chris Finlayson, who said Tony Molloy should surrender his Queens' Counsel warrant, calling his criticisms "vulgar and crude".The Finlayson comments also drew their own stinging online criticisms (see below).

Meanwhile, senior Queens Counsel Julian Miles and Bruce Gray stepped into the fray with a letter to the National Business Review which referenced Tony Molloy's "outrageous criticisms" and "vituperative abuse" of judges and references to their being out of depth and self important.

The letter echoed comments made by Law Society president Jonathan Temm who called for restraint in the manner in which the debate was handled and spoke of the Law Commission steps currently being taken to consider the specialisation issue.The issue has developed in recent years driven by barristers and others, including long-time specialisation proponent Anthony Grant.

Bar Association president Miriam Dean QC also called for restraint and criticised Tony Molloy's comments, or at least the manner in which they were expressed.Attorney General Chris Finlayson has himself suggested there should be judicial specialisation and has himself supported comments made on the matter by Tony Molloy.


Read more at LawFuel - http://www.lawfuel.co.nz/news/415/the-qcs-spat-gets-ugly

--

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news