Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


NZ government supports imperialist assault on Syria

New Zealand Labour Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern declared on April 14 that New Zealand “accepted” the US-British-French missile strikes on Syria. Ardern revealed that her government had been informed about the attack hours in advance.

Ardern repeated the justifications put forward by the US, UK and France for the missile attacks, claiming they had “responded to the grave violation of international law, and the abhorrent use of chemical weapons against civilians.” The action was intended to prevent “further such atrocities being committed,” she said.

This is a farrago of lies. The attack on Syria was an illegal act of aggression. US President Trump, French President Macron and British Prime Minister May, whose governments lack any popular support, are presiding over yet another imperialist war crime, which poses the immense danger of opening up a major war with nuclear-armed Russia.

The pretext for the attack on Syria was the unproven allegation that President Bashar al-Assad’s military used banned chemical weapons against US-backed militias in the city of Douma. The claims are based on dubious footage made by the pro-US White Helmets, whose forces were on the verge of being defeated by the Syrian regime, which had no military reason to carry out such an attack.

The real motive of Washington and its allies is to assert their strategic position in the Middle East, which has been weakened by Russian and Iranian intervention that stymied the US regime-change operation in Syria. The Syrian war is leading toward a direct US confrontation with Russia, which Washington this year declared to be its main strategic competitor alongside China.

The response of New Zealand’s Labour-led government underscores that it, no less than the previous National Party government, is prepared to take the country into a catastrophic war in support of its US and European allies.

Asked if she would send troops to Syria, Ardern did not rule it out, telling reporters: “That’s a hypothetical. We haven’t been asked.” Her government has kept more than 100 New Zealand soldiers in Iraq and a handful in Afghanistan.

Ardern denounced Russia for vetoing UN Security Council resolutions that would have paved the way for a UN-backed military intervention. She said she would discuss the war with French, German and British leaders during an upcoming visit to Europe.

The Labour Party, far from being a “progressive” alternative to National, as presented by liberal, trade union and pseudo-left commentators, is a pro-imperialist party. It supports the closest alliance with Australia, the US and European powers in order to ensure their support for the NZ ruling elite’s own neo-colonial operations in the Pacific.

Labour agreed with the previous National Party government’s announcement in 2016 that $20 billion would be spent to upgrade the military over 15 years to make it “inter-operable” with the US and other allies. At the same time, Labour is continuing to underfund basic services such as healthcare, housing and education.

The Labour-Green-New Zealand First coalition government was installed following last September’s election with Washington’s support, in order to align New Zealand’s foreign policy even more closely with the US.

While Labour and the right-wing populist NZ First were negotiating their coalition agreement, US ambassador Scott Brown publicly criticised the National Party government’s reluctance to endorse Trump’s threats to annihilate North Korea. He made clear that the Trump administration expected a firmer pro-US stance from the next government.

Shortly after becoming prime minister, Ardern said she would be prepared to support an attack on North Korea. She and Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters have also denounced Chinese investment and diplomatic activity in the Pacific.

Earlier this month, following pressure from Britain’s high commissioner, the government abandoned efforts to restart trade negotiations with Russia. Ardern and Peters, who is also foreign minister and NZ First leader, expressed support for the British government’s belligerent stance against Moscow, echoing its lie that it had proof Moscow organised the poisoning of Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.

The working class is overwhelmingly antiwar. A poll of more than 3,700 people by TVNZ last year found 90 percent opposed New Zealand involvement in Syria. Yet this opposition finds no expression in the political establishment.

The Green Party, which is part of the government, cynically attempted to distance itself from Ardern’s embrace of the assault on Syria. One MP, Golriz Ghahraman, wrote on the Spinoff that the attack was “a continuation of a policy that protects American and western interests and a breach of international law.”

Greens co-leader James Shaw quickly downplayed the column, telling the bFM radio station on April 16: “I agree with both the prime minister and with Golriz.” He said the missile strikes were “unlawful” and the war in Syria had been “made worse” by US support and training for anti-Assad forces. However, Shaw echoed the unsubstantiated claims that the Syrian military carried out the Douma chemical attack.

The Greens supported the 1999-2008 Labour government, which strengthened New Zealand’s alliance with Washington. Labour sent SAS forces to join the US-led invasion of Afghanistan following the September 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, and a contingent of army engineers to support the occupation of Iraq.

The Greens initially opposed the invasion of Afghanistan, but later supported New Zealand’s participation in the war, which the party fraudulently presented as peacekeeping.” Today, the Green Party is once again propping up a Labour government and seeking to provide a “progressive” coloration to its support for war in the Middle East and elsewhere.

By John Braddock and Tom Peters (original url:

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: Tom Wolfe The Parajournalist

As New Journalism’s primary advocate, Tom Wolfe headed the field with such experimental forces as Norman Mailer, Truman Capote and Hunter S. Thompson, all dedicated to enriching supposedly factual accounts with excessive flourishes that hurried out the beige in favour of the kaleidoscopic. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Racism And The Windsors

For all the talk about the modernizing effect that Meghan Markle could have on the Royal Family, the suspicion all along has been that the House of Windsor is resistant to change at any level beyond the purely decorative. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Prospects Of US Talks With North Korea

On June 12, the leaders of North Korea and the United States will meet across a table in Singapore, and Kim Jong Un must already be feeling giddy at the thought that this meeting is already being described with the word “summit” formerly reserved for meetings between superpowers of equal stature... Image: Steve Bolton NZ's contribution to the IAEA’s work on North Korea

  • United Nations - UN chief ‘optimistic’ over peace efforts
  • David Swanson - Enough is Enough. The Time Has Come to BDS the US - Peace Comes to Korea: Let’s Understand Why
  • CTBTO - CTBTO on North Korea
  • NZ Govt - NZ welcomes talks between North and South Korea
  • Massey University - Nukes to cyber war – NZ security in focus
  • Jim Miles - The Doomsday Machine - Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner
  • UNHCHR - North Korea detente: UN expert urges human rights opening
  • Binoy Kampmark - Trump, North Korea and Post-Olympic Angst
  • Gordon Campbell: On National’s Latest Attempts At Relevance

    Having ignored the existence of massive problems in health and education for nine years in government, it is no longer politically viable for National to maintain the pretence that such problems really don’t exist, or are somehow unworthy of serious concern by rational men of commerce.... More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On The Need For Immediate Action On WINZ

    So the old saying goes, the main difference between the centre-right and centre-left is that both believe in market solutions, but the centre-left spends a lot more time worrying about the effects, afterwards. More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On Petrol Pricing And The Midwives March

    The public brawl between Energy Minister Megan Woods and BP looks like spinning off – as brawls tend to do – into a whole array of extraneous matters. Evidently, some people find it hard to see the difference between taxes and profits. More>>