Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

End of tenure review does not end debate


End of tenure review does not end debate on leases or land management

First published in Energy and Environment on June 20, 2019.

Submissions on the management of Crown pastoral land shows ending the tenure review process does not solve the problem of balancing the property rights of leaseholders with preservation of the iconic environmental values of the area covered.

Land Information NZ received submissions from 32 organisations, and 3,216 individuals (including 2,739 form submissions provided by Forest & Bird and Greenpeace) with 100 submitters also endorsed the High Country Accord’s submission on behalf of leaseholders.

Earlier this year the Government announced it would be ending tenure review where land can be sold to a leaseholder and areas with high ecological or other values transferred to the conservation estate.

This means the Crown will likely remain the long-term owner of 1.2m hectares of leased pastoral land, though several submissions said there still should be ways to end leases.

Pastoral leaseholders wanted future management to reflect the contractual relationship with the Crown, such as the exclusive right to pasturage of the land and to exclusive occupation and quiet enjoyment. Other submitters want the Crown to do more to protect the rights it has reserved in Crown pastoral land and the significant public interest in how the estate is administered.

There were also submitters questioning whether the pastoral lease, which is intended to provide primarily for pastoral farming and limited other uses, is still fit for purpose considering the changing context of the high country.

Leaseholders said the proposed management hierarchy, which places natural capital, and culture and heritage values above pastoral activity, impacts on leaseholders’ property rights as contractually agreed.

Many submitters, especially environmental groups, view that the hierarchy is essential to maintain environmental bottom-lines. Forest & Bird and Environmental Defence Society in their joint submission said the way the outcomes were defined did not go far enough and would end up perpetuating the trade-offs already occurring.

The tenure review process was intended to see leases moved into private ownership and some land moved back into full Crown control, but was widely criticised as some lease holders made large windfall profits with more land turned over into intensive farming.

Current leaseholder expressed concern their future management of the land would be tainted by reactions to tenure review outcomes and this was not fair.

Many said there should also be mechanisms to purchase whole of partial leases to protect vulnerable inherent values and enhance public access.

Most submitters who recommended this approach view that purchases should be carried out by the Nature Heritage Fund and the purchased lease should then become public conservation land. Areas of the previously leased land that is already developed could first be offered to the relevant iwi and then on-sold through a public auction to fund future purchases.

The Environmental Defence Society and Forest & Bird suggest $200m would be needed to target highly valued leasehold land.

Some said it was also presumptuous of the Government to end tenure review without consultation and every leaseholder currently in the process should be given the option to go forward with their review in good faith.

Environmental groups tended to disagree and said any proposals had to be reassessed due to the significance of the landscapes involved.First published in Energy and Environment on June 20, 2019.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On Betraying The Kurds

The Americans have now callously thrown the Kurds under the bus and created the ideal conditions for Islamic State to mount a comeback – all done so that Donald Trump can brag on the 2020 campaign trail that he brought the US troops home. How is the current fighting likely to proceed? More>>

ALSO:

Expert Comment: Online Voting Won’t Mean More Engagement

“Overseas experience is that online voting tends to be popular with those who are already likely to vote and who have high levels of digital literacy. It does little to help add new people to the voter pool, and this holds even for young voters.”More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Saudis (Not) Getting Away With Murder

On October 2nd last year, the dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered inside the Saudi Embassy in Istanbul, by a hit squad of assassins acting on the orders of the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammad bin Salman. More>>

Ellen Rykers on The Dig: Community Conservation – The Solution To The Biodiversity Crisis?

It’s increasingly clear that a government agency alone cannot combat the biodiversity crisis successfully. These grass-roots initiatives are a growing resource in the conservation toolbox. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Saudi Oil Refinery Crisis

So the US and the Saudis claim to have credible evidence that those Weapons of Oil Destruction came from Iran, their current bogey now that Saddam Hussein is no longer available. Evidently, the world has learned nothing from the invasion of Iraq in 2003 when dodgy US intel was wheeled out to justify the invasion of Iraq, thereby giving birth to ISIS and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. More>>

ALSO: