ACC Minister fails to take responsibility for gaff
Grant Robertson
State Services Spokesperson
3
June 2009 Media Statement
ACC Minister
fails to take responsibility for gaff
ACC Minister
Nick Smith’s refusal to apologise to staff at ACC after he
revealed that jobs were to be cut at the Corporate Office,
the day before the announcement was due to be made to staff,
shows disrespect and a complete lack of responsibility,
Grant Robertson Labour State Services Spokesperson
says.
Dr Smith pre-empted the announcement of the loss of 70 jobs at the ACC Corporate Office by blurting out the information in Parliament. This led the Chief Executive to apologise to all staff and to express concern that this compromised her desire to treat staff with dignity and respect,” Grant Robertson said.
“Today in Parliament I gave Dr Smith the opportunity to apologise to ACC staff for his error. He chose not to do so. This shows contempt and disrespect for all the staff of ACC, in particular those who are losing their jobs as a result of the National Government’s cuts to the public service.
“Dr Smith also owes an apology to the Chief Executive Jan White who was caught unawares by the Minister’s. Her email to staff says ‘regrettably the proposals were unexpectedly signalled in the House’. Her planned approach to informing staff had been designed to ensure that ‘we treat people with dignity and respect’.
“In their election manifesto National promised to ‘promote an environment of professionalism and mutual respect’ in the public service. Their approach to the cutting of more than 1400 jobs has shown neither of these qualities.
“Ministers have attempted to wash their hands of the job losses, and now Dr Smith has failed to even show the most basic of courtesy to staff by announcing redundancies before they had been informed by the Chief Executive.
Dr Smith owes the staff of ACC an apology, and his refusal to do so smacks of arrogance and shows he is out of touch with the effects of job losses on staff and their families,” Grant Robertson said.
--
Attached: copies of emails from Jan
White CEO of ACC
--
> Subject: Special edition of
Insight 26 May 2009
>
> 26 May 2009
>
> Tēnā
koutou.
>
>
>
> Some of you may have heard
that redundancies for ACC’s Corporate Office were
unexpectedly signalled in the House late this
afternoon.
>
>
>
> We had a detailed process
in place for tomorrow to honour people as People and ensure
anyone potentially affected – either directly or
indirectly – by proposed changes would be informed first
and, wherever possible, in person.
>
> I had planned
to communicate with all of you late tomorrow to let you know
about proposed changes in IMG, People & Business Services,
Finance and Maori & Community Relations.
>
>
>
> I sincerely apologise for the way in which you
may have heard about this. We will continue to proceed with
our planned approach tomorrow to ensure we treat people with
dignity and respect.
>
>
>
> I will have more
information for you tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
Regards,
>
>
>
> Jan White
>
>
>
>
--
> Subject: ACC Insight 27 May 2009 -
Proposed changes in Corporate
> Office
>
> 27 May
2009
>
> Tēnā koutou
>
>
>
> In my
email to you yesterday, I advised that we had a detailed
plan to communicate some proposed changes in Corporate
Office to ensure we honour people as People in the process
of formally consulting with you.
>
>
>
>
Regrettably, the proposals were unexpectedly signalled in
the House yesterday. I do, however, want to share the
details with you now.
>
>
>
> Background
>
In his video message to staff recently, our Chair John Judge
talked about the Board’s determination to ensure ACC is
financially sustainable so New Zealanders can continue to
have a 24-hour, no fault accident compensation
scheme.
>
>
>
> He talked about the need to
move more towards an insurance model and away from a welfare
agency, to be innovative and act with urgency to address the
financial challenges we face.
>
>
>
> In my
weekly Insight, I’ve kept you up to date with work that is
being
> done to review our costs, and I signalled some
weeks ago that, like all public sector agencies, this
includes looking at staff numbers.
>
>
>
> The
Value for Money review that’s been taking place with an
external oversight committee, will report its findings and
recommendations to ELT next month. In addition, David Taylor
of consulting firm Morrison Low & Associates is doing an
independent review of staff numbers in Corporate
Office.
>
>
>
> Reasons for the Corporate
Office review As part of the way we do
> business, we
must always review the way we do things to ensure we are an
efficient and effective organisation. However, our
administrative costs are over budget, and we continue to be
impacted by growing Scheme costs and liability.
>
>
>
> We also have a clear responsibility to ensure we
meet the expectations of the Government and the community in
driving Value for Money, especially during this time of
recession. And we must continue to meet the needs of our
clients. We are putting more focus on the front line where
we are adding another 100 roles.
>
>
>
> Each
general manager has reviewed their area of business in
Corporate
> Office to identify where business
requirements have changed, and where key programmes of work
have been completed, been stopped or moved into a different
phase. They have then identified where staffing
efficiencies can be gained as a result of these changes to
programmes of work.
>
>
>
> Proposed changes
in some corporate office areas The General Managers
> of
People & Business Services, Information Management Group,
Finance, and the Director, Maori & Community Relations have
started the consultation process with people in their
business groups about proposals for change in their areas of
the business. Injury Prevention, Levy & Scheme Management
and Strategic Policy and Research are not included in this
review but we will look at these areas in the coming
months.
>
>
>
> The consultation documents for
business groups reviewing their
> structures now will be
on the intranet this afternoon and we welcome feedback from
all staff on these proposals. Consultation will end on 11
June and, once ELT has considered the feedback we anticipate
making a final decision about the structure around 16
June.
>
>
>
> We have already removed around
150 contractor roles from the business. In addition to
this, about 180 roles are affected by the proposed changes
and, the reality is, should the proposals proceed, there
would be a reduction of around 70 roles in Corporate
Office.
>
>
>
> Managing through change
>
This is not an easy time. For those people whose roles are
directly affected, it is really, really tough, and I give
you my commitment that we will do everything possible to
support you. It’s also tough for colleagues whose roles
aren’t directly affected.
>
>
>
> I know
that we’re all aware of similar changes happening in both
the public and private sector across New Zealand and indeed
the world. But that doesn’t really make it any easier
when it impacts us.
>
>
>
> As the Board
develops a clear view of the future shape of the
organisation over the next couple of months, we are likely
to need to make further changes to ensure our structure
supports that strategy.
>
>
>
> What I can
commit to, is that we will treat everyone with dignity and
respect. We are providing support through on site
counsellors and access to EAP, and we will do our best to
find roles for people in other parts of the business where
possible. But the stark reality is we will be reducing our
staff numbers.
>
>
>
> For an organisation
that cares for people at challenging times in their lives,
people here are by nature empathetic. I know you will
extend this empathy to colleagues affected directly or
indirectly by these changes.
>
>
>
>
Regards,
>
>
>
> Jan White
>
>
>
>
>
ENDS