Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Taxpayers pay for big business to pollute

Climate and taxpayers pay for big business to pollute

September 20, 2007

Auckland, New Zealand — Greenpeace welcomed the announcement of an emissions trading scheme intended to tackle climate change, but is alarmed that there are no targets set for reduction of our greenhouse gas emissions and thus no guarantee that emissions will actually reduce - the reason for the scheme in the first place. "Its bias towards the interests of polluters is a fundamental flaw, meaning windfall profits to their shareholders and big costs to the taxpayer and the climate," says Greenpeace climate campaigner Susannah Bailey.

"To be on track to avoid dangerous levels of climate change, the Government needs to achieve at least a 30% reduction in New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and an 80-90% reduction by 2050 from 1990 levels. This scheme won't get us close. Projected emissions reductions from the scheme fall far short of those required under the Kyoto Protocol."

"To be effective and fair, all sectors and greenhouse gases should be included, industries should not be subsidised with free permits to emit greenhouse gases, and revenue generated from the scheme should be invested in sustainability projects."

Yet today, the Government announced that the agricultural sector will be exempt until 2013, and even then will receive the vast majority of its permits for free.

"Every New Zealander will be paying for agriculture's share of the burden. The Government's decision to exempt agriculture means that the dairy sector will be subsidised at a time when they least need it. Mandatory targets for all sectors are essential in order for significant reductions to be achieved," said Ms Bailey.

Big energy users will also benefit from free subsidies in the scheme, with the cost picked by the New Zealand taxpayer. Free credits will weaken the credibility and effectiveness of the scheme. "Free credits are the emissions trading equivalent of tax breaks. Every free credit that goes to industry is money in shareholders pockets while consumers not only subsidise the polluting sector through their taxes but also pay increased prices [2]. It is disappointing that the Government hasn't learned from the European Union, who found that free credits offered through phase one of their emissions trading scheme did not provide sufficient encouragement for firms to reduce their emissions."

The Government should auction permits and use the money raised to assist vulnerable people and help New Zealanders to live more sustainably.

"The establishment of an emissions trading scheme is a step in the right direction, but the current scheme fails to go anywhere near far enough. As the scheme stands, the agricultural sector and big energy users are the winners and taxpayers and the climate carry the burden. The Government has picked up the ball on emissions trading, but doesn't seem to have the courage to run with it."

The main problems with the current proposal for emissions trading are:

- There are no mandatory emissions reduction targets. There is therefore no guarantee that New Zealand's emissions will actually reduce as a result of this scheme. Goals for carbon neutrality do not guarantee emissions reductions - Not all sectors are included in the scheme from the outset Agriculture will be subsidised by New Zealand taxpayers for the next six years. - Major polluters can expect windfall profits under the scheme from free pollution credits - Coal exports are exempt as are fugitive emissions from coal mining (although fugitive geothermal emissions are covered by the scheme)

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

KiwiBailed: KiwiBuild Head Officially Resigns

The head of Kiwibuild, Stephen Barclay has officially resigned from the role. In a statement issued on his behalf, it was announced that he would step down from today [Friday].

Housing Minister Phil Twyford's office said he would not be commenting on Mr Barclay's resignation as it was an employment matter. Last month, Mr Twyford confirmed that Mr Barclay had not been at work for a number of weeks. More>>

 

Welfare Stats: Rise In Hardship Numbers Shows Income Inadequacy

The latest Ministry of Social Development quarterly report show that a record number of people have received hardship assistance from work and income, with an additional 40,000 hardship payments made between September and December 2018, compared to the previous quarter of the same year... More>>

ALSO:

DHBs "Prepared": Junior Doctors Strike Again

The needs of acute patients will be met during tomorrow's junior doctor strike, a DHB spokesperson says... Almost 3000 junior doctors are expected to walk off the job, which will affect all DHBs apart from West Coast District Health Board. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On MBIE’s Social Media Scam

Given the ambit of MBIE’s work, almost any form of social activity could qualify as being part of MBIE’s brief, so the privacy threats posed by this training programme are extensive. The current oversight safeguards seem threadbare to non-existent. More>>

ALSO:

JusTrade: New Campaign For A 21th Century Trade Agenda

‘Critique is no longer enough. If anything is to really change, we need to step away from the existing framework and take a first-principles approach to rethinking what will work for the 21st century.’ More>>

Earlier:

Gordon Campbell: Thompson + Clark Are The Tip Of The Iceberg

How can we tell where and how any lines are being drawn? Oversight is not exactly robust. If it were, Thompson + Clark would have been out of contention for state security work ten years ago. More>>

Trainers: Taratahi Institute of Agriculture In Interim Liquidation

Taratahi employ 250 staff and this year has provided education to over 2500 students. Taratahi owns and manages 8 farms throughout the country. More>>

ALSO:

IPCA Report: Complaints About Deputy Commissioner Wallace Haumaha

The Authority has found that DC Haumaha acted improperly by approaching staff and others to provide information to support him to refute the allegations about his 2016 conduct, or solicited other staff to do so on his behalf... More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels