Care Providers Win Judicial Review against DHBs
MEDIA RELEASE
8 December 2007
Aged Care Providers Win Judicial Review against DHBs
The High Court in Wellington
has agreed with providers of quality aged care
in New
Zealand that District Health Boards are acting unlawfully
by
inserting collective agreement clauses into service
agreements.
Justice McGechan yesterday ruled in favour of
aged care providers who took
judicial review proceedings
against DHBs for inserting collective agreement
and
passing-on clauses in service agreements.
The chief
executive of HealthCare Providers NZ, Martin Taylor, said
today
that DHBs had been working secretly with unions to
orchestrate a rise in the
number of collective
agreements. The judgment declared that DHBs
acted
unlawfully in deciding to include clauses A4 and A5
in aged care providers'
service contracts.
"A major
part of this case was about how and when a Minister can
direct
government agencies to do things they don't agree
with. The High Court
agrees with HealthCare Providers
that the Minister overstepped his
boundaries and acted
improperly", Mr Taylor said.
This case was not about
whether care providers were passing on funding
targeted
for caregivers and cleaners, as unions claimed during the
hearings.
The case was about playing fair and meeting
consultation obligations. The
court believed DHBs did
neither of these two things, he said.
The full judgment
can be found at www.healthcareproviders.org.nz
under
'important
papers'
ENDS
Country Music Honours: 2026 Country Music Honours Finalists Announced
Mana Mokopuna: Children’s Commissioner Welcomes New Youth Mental Health And Suicide Prevention Services In Te Tai Tokerau
New Zealand Kindergartens: 100-Years On - Investing In Teacher-Led, Quality Early Childhood Education Is Investing In Aotearoa’s Future
Dry July: Thousands Set To Go Alcohol Free This July As Cancer Diagnoses Continue To Rise Across Aotearoa
New Zealand College of Midwives: Celebrating Midwives Across Aotearoa This International Day Of The Midwife
PPTA Te Wehengarua: Building The Secondary Curriculum On Broken Drafts Is A Serious Risk