Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

MADD Naive over Drug Cocktails

MADD Naive over Drug Cocktails
Candor Trust

The Candor Trust is pleased the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse has funded studies about the serious drug driving issue, but is appalled at the hostile "turf guarding" attitude of MADD Canada. A batten the hatches attitude that anyone can see is destructive to that organisations supposed road safety objectives.

Responding to two studies finding that (similar to New Zealand per Candors' roadside survey) 7.2% of live drivers tested positive for risk drugs, and 33% of deceased drivers tested positive for drugs while 37% had alcohol in their systems, Andrew Murie, CEO of MADD Canada, argued in the media today that the presence of a drug did not equate to impairment - despite that the study dealt with typically impairing drugs.

He further stated that while drugs driving is a major issue, drinking alcohol and driving is still the Number 1 problem, which is wrong framing. He is part of the problem described by CCSA's senior research analyst Doug Beirness; "there seems to be a public perception that drug use doesn't affect drivers to the same extent as drinking,(when) many drugs affect the physical and cognitive processes necessary to operate a vehicle safely, posing a serious risk."

It seems grotesque for a supposed road safety organisation like MADD to treat the drug driving issue as competition, when the reality is it is one of the major drivers of drink driving fatalities. Because frequent combining of drugs and alcohol in this millenium massively raises the probability of an "alcohol related" crash. Pot/Plonk mixing has largely supplanted sole use.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Research in the state of Victoria by Drummer et al demonstrated as far back as 2004 that the all time favorite cocktail of cannabis and alcohol doubles the expected blood alcohol related risk. Diminishing the frequency of cannabis use by use of random roadside saliva tests in Australia has been the single most powerful new initiative rolled out in the last decade to reduce the drink driving toll.

The road toll immediately dropped 10%, and Victoria has sustained one of the lowest drink driving tolls per capita, ever since rolling out random saliva drug testing. Until MADD wakes up and recognises that the drink driving and drug driving issues are inseparable, each issue feeding and fuelling the risk and harm of the other, it cannot maximise its harm reduction goals.

Either MADD wants sober and clean drivers or it doesn't. Half measures as regards impaired driving are the road safety version of Weight Watchers telling those at cardiac risk to cut down or quit pastry but icecream is not so bad... because well pastry is the big issue. For us.

MADD must learn to grapple with the alcohol and other drug driving issue and fast. That may mean some meditation on its core objectives, and how best to meet then in light of current research, because scaring people off alcohol (or using over limit amounts) onto less detectable drugs isn't laudable. It's a big boo boo to silo alcohol from other drugs in drivers.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION
 
 
  • Wellington
  • Christchurch
  • Auckland
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.