Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Howard's End: Viral Bureaucracy

My recent Howard's End column "Organisational Psychopaths" drew a global response to my email from Scoop readers. The central thrust of the feedback was very positive and asked for my views of exactly where I consider things could be further improved in New Zealand. Well, here goes. Maree Howard writes.

In that Howard's End column I wrote " Personally, I am sick and tired of having to deal with people in both government departments and business who are clearly dysfunctional and, from my experience, meet most of the criteria of an organisational psychopath."

For example, why would a government department allow possum fur to be imported into New Zealand from Australia when there are around 60,000 possums eating up our bush? Is that not the hallmarks of dysfunctional bureaucratic decision-making?

I work on the premise that most people firstly want the simple things in life. Safe and nutritional food, clean water, good shelter and a worthwhile job.

That's shouldn't be too hard to provide in a country such as New Zealand.

But when I discover that Coca-Cola and petrol is allowed to be cheaper than milk I, and most other Kiwi's should, become very angry.

How on earth did we ever get ourselves into the situation where people have to rely on food banks for basic survival? Or being cold because they can't afford electricity?

You, dear reader, should be very surprised and perhaps even outraged, to also learn that too many New Zealanders can only afford to pay-off a meagre two or three dollars a week from their electricity accounts.

One Scoop reader, who is a very public figure with a social conscience, wrote explaining that Government today is not your friend.

She said; " New Zealanders need to understand that while they worry about big corporations and globalisation, Government and its bureaucracy is quietly working away becoming all-encompassing."

Normally, I would say this is right-wing whacko stuff. But no, this came from a person who is publicly renowned for having a social conscience. On the surface she would appear to be a great friend of government.

But even she is concerned and has a fear of an out-of-control bureaucracy now staffed with people embodied with the traits of organisational psychopaths.

My Scoop feedback writer suggested that the employer of the State bureaucracy, the State Services Commission, is itself full of organisational psychopaths and so the pattern comes from the top.

That set me to thinking about "the bureaucracy."

Firstly, let me say that many at the lower level of bureaucracy are wonderful human beings working under very difficult and trying circumstances. Where the problem seems to be is at the middle to upper level of management.

For instance, do middle or upper management bureaucrats undergo regular organisational psychopath testing to establish whether they remain fit for the job? It seems they don't.

I would have thought that was vital, particularly when these people train (indoctrinate) young and impressionable staff and also deal with members of the public.

Bureaucrats - those "officials" appointed, hired or "named" to run bureaucracies - tend to grow themselves unnecessarily and exponentially.

According to sociologist C. Northcote Parkinson, the natural tendency of bureaucracy is to grow and keep on growing by at least 6 percent per year.

Then, wanting to appear busy or important, or both, bureaucrats increase their workload by writing memos, creating lots of rules and regulations, filling out forms and creating forms that need filling out and maintaining files.

In other words, a huge "make-work" programme.

Then a strange thing happens. These bureaucrats suddenly feel overburdened by all the work they have created. So they feel compelled to hire assistants.

At this point, bureaucracy really takes off because now - with growing workloads and numbers of assistants to manage - bureaucrats push for more power, responsibility and money because their jobs have become harder.

This organisational creep then begins to repeat itself over and over again until suddenly, the growth is out of control.

Parkinson observes that as a result of organisational creep, many bureaucrats end up doing the same work at a great cost to tax-payers.

Former US Vice President, Al Gore, when examining the US bureaucracy found " As a rule, virtually any task being done by government is being done by 20 or more other agencies."

Why do Kiwi's tolerate this in our government when we wouldn't tolerate it in our own lives?

Would you pay 20 electricity supply companies every month if you only had to pay one?

How many corporate executives would keep their jobs if they regularly hired 20 people to do the job of one? How many small business owners would survive if they hired 20 times the number of employees they actually needed?

That is the problem but there is a solution. The State Services Commission, as the employer of State servants, exists to ensure efficiency and effectiveness of the public service. Based on my experience it is failing miserably and I do not see much evidence of it holding rogues in the public service accountable for their behaviour.

The media has even adopted the name "Teflon Territory" when bad bureaucratic behaviour is not bought to book or held accountable.

In the Howard's End column "Organisational Psychopaths" I wrote; " We firstly need to publicly expose their behaviour and then we must weed them out. We can't afford not to, because they are costing us our future."

The organisation that ensures scrutiny and accountability on behalf of the public, is ultimately the State Services Commission. That is where the public spotlight needs to focus.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Digitl: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?
In 1989 Charles Handy wrote The Age of Unreason. It's a book that looked forward to a time where telecommuting would be an everyday reality. We live in that world today, although we use the term working from home. The book contains other predictions that were on the money... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>