Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


The Real Deal: Sensuality vs. Puritanism

Sensuality vs. Puritanism:
What Can A Woman Can Do to Help the Solari Index Rise?

By Catherine Austin Fitts

Essay written to the Solari Action Network, September 1999

I am thinking tonight about the things that each one of us can do in our lives day to day that will make a small but concrete difference in transforming us to a civilization which enjoys free markets and real democratic process in a republic. Tonight I would like to write as a woman to the women...or if you are a guy, the women in your life if you care to pass this on. When I am still grappling with an issue, I need to just put out what I feel. I need to swarm on it and see where the swarm takes it. Please forgive me if I give offense. Our feelings always lead us into areas that are sensitive for all of us. So help me out and here goes.

Dan Russell's new book on the Drug Wars is so wonderful it is hard to describe. One of the reasons it gave me so much energy was it really reconnected me emotionally with the critical importance of criminalization of essential hungers (drugs, sex, money) to increase profit margins and create franchise control for those who control the enforcement mechanisms within a society. It is a way to turn over control to the most evil; the most violent.

Every one of us has a dream. Every one of us wants or hungers for beauty, truth, attention, admiration, pleasure, knowledge, connection, and procreation. We have intentions, we have desires. We have myths in our head that speak to what gives us energy. Each of us is totally unique but we all enjoy having lots of energy. We just get it and give it in an endless variety of ways. That is why markets, democratic process and other swarm systems are so wonderful where they have the rule of law and the rule of performance protecting their integrity....they let us move around in the dance. They offer us the freedom to take it or leave it or vote or not on thousands of questions a day.

In terms of a community or society's management of resources there are two essential models. The first is based on the assumption that using markets and democracy that we can optimize our meaning and our energy (whether our space, our knowledge, our money, our health, our time, etc) best by letting every man and woman pursue their dream, even help them get it. The other model assumes that other parties are evil, that the system can not work on a self organizing basis, and that I need to rig it for my team.

Let me say it another way using the Solari (Popsicle) Index. Again, the Solari Index is a performance measurement for the performance of community investment. The Solari Index is the % of people in a community who believe that a child can leave their home, go to the nearest place to get a popsicle and come home alone safely.

When I was five, the Solari Index in West Philadelphia was 100%. Ten years later after CIA and HUD had moved in, the Solari Index was 50% and falling. There was and always is a direct correlation between the Solari Index and the value of the homes and real estate, small business and other assets in a community. So the homeowners got killed, but could get rich reversing it too. In essence a few guys get rich with CIA and HUD, but much less wealth was made on the liquidation of a healthy neighborhood and local economy than the wealth destroyed. That is what is powerful about reversing the process. Undoing the harm creates much more wealth, much more broadly distributed.

All enterprise-whether government or business-can be divided up between things that make the Solari Index rise and things that make the Solari Index go down. I think e-bay and my cousin Jane here in Hickory Valley, Tennessee help the Solari Index rise. I think CIA drug dealing and Washington Times and Washington Post disinformation cause it to go down. I get my thrills out of making money or teaching other people how to make money making the Solari Index rise.

I also get thrills making money deleting people who make the Solari Index go down. So the idea of a class action suit that holds government contractors like Lockheed Martin, DynCorp, JP Morgan-Chase, Harvard and Arthur Anderson responsible for money lost in the FHA Fund from corrupt policies or stolen and/or laundered through HUD could get me pretty jazzed. The idea of winning $250 MM of legal settlements from a variety of parties over damages to me and my companies for the Solari Trust to invest in Solari B’s (non-voting shares) of individual solaris (community data banks and investment advisors) has me totally jazzed.

If the legal industry can find a way to make money on draining the corporations and investors who intentionally make the Solari Index go down with drugs, financial fraud or government corruption, we can get a whole lot done. Meantime, my dream has more to do with a guy and being safe than with money.

In my family, if you ask a Northern woman how to get anything done, she will dial into Amazon, get the books, and figure out how to build a nuclear reactor in the back yard or whatever. If you ask a Southern woman, she will simply figure out who knows a nuclear engineer and then she will figure out how to get him to want to build one in her back yard. She thinks in terms of incentives.

The issue of whether the Solari Index rises or goes down in America is connected to incentives. What do I need to do to make sure I and my family are physically and financially safe and what do I have to do to get my dream? Increasingly, more and more people are incentivized to make the Solari Index go down. Let me give you an example. Let's say Time Magazine does not tell the truth. Do we buy it still? Yes. Which means that the Chairman gets a big bonus each year and has access to low cost stock market capital which means he can buy or sell the politicians and small business folks like me.

OK, if he gets the money, who gets the girls? Who wins the breeding rights? Cause that is what it is about. It is about human energy. Attention. Love. Energy. Warmth. Admiration. Sex. Heirs. Eternal Life through physical and mental genes.

Well, let's say two honest hardworking cops or prosecutors or journalists who are trying to stop this stuff are walking down Fifth Avenue. Out comes a senior management type from Wackenhut's prison and security companies who is making big big bucks and he gets into his turbo charge Porsche to drive to his summer estate in the Hamptons. Who is going to get the girls? For a date, for some good loving, for a wife?

OK, did the CIA make that decision? Nope. They simply hooked us women with our own inattention to incentive systems.

OK, so what would happen tomorrow if every man in America who makes the Solari Index go down were considered repulsive by all women? What would happen?

OK, so what does that have to do with criminalization? Well, it really has to do with why Puritanism is more dangerous than the CIA and why that knowledge can help us turn this thing around.

There are things that men and women need which are essential for their health and happiness. Security is one. Sex is one. I like to think that truth, beauty and joy are all up there. Because everyone needs pleasure and happiness and the things that go into that. If these things are perfectly natural and accessible they usually are not expensive in terms of time or energy to get. Everybody needs them, so the market whether though barter or social arrangement or consumer arrangement builds sustainable capacity to make sure we have what we need on a pretty reasonable basis.

Someone can always make money cutting off something we need and then controlling the franchise of providing it to us. So by criminalizing drugs for example we can raise the profits on a shipload of marijuana from say $1MM that needs to be reinvested back in the basic business to $30MM which is mostly available for new activities. As we used to say in New York "pass a law, make a business."

Now this cannot happen in America unless everybody buys into the myth that using drugs is wrong. That is a tough one given how much Merck and Novartis et al are making providing Ritalin like products to drug our kids. So a lot of branding goes into what is a good drug and what is a bad drug. But we have to go along with the deal. Heroin and cocaine are bad. We should not legalize.

We should police our ethics with government intervention. Which brings me to sex, which is where I want to go. There is no way you can control a society with money. Money can swing the swarm this way or that, but it cannot keep every body shut up on things like Waco. You need other things. That is where physical intimidation and harm come in. But you have to be careful there because killing too many people blows the branding. Which is why sex has been so very useful to keeping this game going. Men with no access to great sex and admiration and praise and where prostitution is illegal can be slowly brought to hunger and deviant hunger through deprivation. Then they can get interested in lots of stuff, including increasingly deviant sex.

One of the most beautiful energy forces in the world has got to be the sexual hunger of men. How can we not love that joy and that power? Clearly, it is one of the all time energizer bunnies of the human race. Meantime, nothing is more depressing than seeing it bottled up, misused and turn in negative directions. Indeed, while patriarchy may be pretty wonderful for the top 1-20% of the men in a society, it is pretty hideous for the rest. All the guys have to play enforcement or clean up just to get limited access to sex and the self-esteem issues are pretty ugly. Meantime, Puritanism is making sure that the pleasure that we each need is coming up short. It is part and parcel of the use of hierarchies to channel that beautiful energy force of men into fighting their way of the chain of limited prestige and related perks, many of them genetic and sexual.

Adam Jukes is a counselor of men who abuse woman. He has written two of the best books I have found so far on some of these issues. He estimates that 40% of men hit or abuse woman and that most of them are psychologically normal. That pretty much fits my personal experience and that of the women in my family, my schools, and my work places.

What that means is that we are socially sick. My guess is that many animals only get like this in zoos or labs.

I wish that tomorrow every woman woke up in America with the sudden idea in her head that she was going to snub any man who did anything that made the Solari Index go down and focus her energy on men who make the Solari Index rise. Indeed, institute a double standard. Puritanism for the guys who make it go down. Abundance of admiration and attention for those who make it rise. Forget class. Forget all those other dividing lines. Let's talk pure performance. Guys who make the Solari Index go down are causing us to be not safe.

If women focus our energy on the men who make the Solari Index rise, stop pressuring men to make sure they provide financial security regardless of what that means in terms of supporting a rotten system or turning a blind eye, redefine prestige in terms of a man's positive contribution to a healthy family and environment and take responsibility to provide an alternative brand of what it means to be a man, things can change a lot. Being a man has nothing to do with money and prestige on the titanic. Noah's wife and kids were the ones that did not drown.

I always think of the hero in the movie the Alamo. He made me feel safe; he could plant and get things to grow. And you know he was fabulous when the lights went out. All men who like women and get treated right by them end up that way. I doubt he had a dime to his name. Money is not worth much during survival time.

Deviancy is deviancy. I don't want to breed with deviancy for any amount of money or fame. Ethel Velez once got mad at me and said with an edge "well, honey, you are white, and you do not run the risk of being lynched" Before I could think twice, I said "well, Ethel, at least you can relax when you get home. You don't have to sleep with the lyncher or have his children." Ethel backed off.

There are not that many deviant guys. But there are a lot of guys who are controlled by them because it’s the way they think they can provide for us or have access to us. We control the access gate. Not the shadow government. All we have to do is believe in abundance and ditch puritanism.

So here is my step #22 for women to stop CIA drug trafficking and Enron financial fraud and HUD government contractor corruption today. Praise and pet every man you know who makes the Solari Index rise for the next week in the ways you might do it that gives you energy and is comfortable and appropriate for your relationship. For example, leave candy for the postman, giggle and wink at the guy who takes your bags at the airport, thank all the other good guys you know for their courage over so many years, tell your dad you love him if he is making the Solari Index rise, otherwise read him the riot act, cancel all your subscriptions to national media, turn off TV that lies or omits, and tell your mate how much you appreciate him. Most certainly delete from your life anyone who is on Richard Grasso or Bush's staff or who works at Citibank, Bank of New York or Harvard Management (who wants to give energy to guys who help money launderers)...and so forth.

Delete the men who like making money from the Solari Index going down, and help those who would like to make money on Solari Rising. See what happens and if something along these lines works for you, teach two woman how to do this in the following week and two more each week thereafter. Tell them to do the same.

Believe it or not, if we all invented this together, we could turn around 281 million folks in a year or two. There is a lot of happiness to be gotten from seeing the good guys win, and blush and giggle and perk up.

Lord knows they deserve it.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Eric Zuesse: U.S. Empire: Biden And Kerry Gave Orders To Ukraine’s President

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at Strategic Culture On May 19th, an implicit international political warning was issued, but it wasn’t issued between countries; it was issued between allied versus opposed factions within each of two countries: U.S. and Ukraine. ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Budget Cockups In The Time Of Coronavirus: Reporting Errors And Australia’s JobKeeper Scheme

Hell has, in its raging fires, ringside seats for those who like their spreadsheets. The seating, already peopled by those from human resources, white collar criminals and accountants, becomes toastier for those who make errors with those spreadsheets. ... More>>

The Dig - COVID-19: Just Recovery

The COVID-19 crisis is compelling us to kick-start investment in a regenerative and zero-carbon future. We were bold enough to act quickly to stop the virus - can we now chart a course for a just recovery? More>>

The Conversation: Are New Zealand's New COVID-19 Laws And Powers Really A Step Towards A Police State?

Reaction to the New Zealand government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown has ranged from high praise to criticism that its actions were illegal and its management chaotic. More>>

Keith Rankin: Universal Versus Targeted Assistance, A Muddled Dichotomy

The Commentariat There is a regular commentariat who appear on places such as 'The Panel' on Radio New Zealand (4pm on weekdays), and on panels on television shows such as Newshub Nation (TV3, weekends) and Q+A (TV1, Mondays). Generally, these panellists ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Welcome Deaths: Coronavirus And The Open Plan Office

For anybody familiar with that gruesome manifestation of the modern work place, namely the open plan office, the advent of coronavirus might be something of a relief. The prospects for infection in such spaces is simply too great. You are at risk from ... More>>

Caitlin Johnstone: Do You Consent To The New Cold War?

The world's worst Putin puppet is escalating tensions with Russia even further, with the Trump administration looking at withdrawal from more nuclear treaties in the near future. In addition to planning on withdrawing from the Open Skies Treaty ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Why Thinking Makes It So: Donald Trump’s Obamagate Fixation

The “gate” suffix has been wearing thin since the break-in scandal that gave it its birth. Since Watergate, virtually anything dubious and suggestive, and much more besides, is suffixed. Which brings us to the issue of President Donald Trump’s ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Ethics (and Some Of The Economics) Of Lifting The Lockdown

As New Zealand passes the half-way mark towards moving out of Level Four lockdown, the trade-offs involved in life-after-lockdown are starting to come into view. All very well for National’s finance spokesperson Paul Goldsmith to claim that “The number one priority we have is to get out of the lockdown as soon as we can”…Yet as PM Jacinda Ardern pointed out a few days ago, any crude trade-off between public health and economic well-being would be a false choice... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Brutal Choices: Anders Tegnell And Sweden’s Herd Immunity Goal

If the title of epidemiological czar were to be created, its first occupant would have to be Sweden’s Anders Tegnell. He has held sway in the face of sceptics and concern that his “herd immunity” approach to COVID-19 is a dangerous, and breathtakingly ... More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog