Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Tube Talk: When Bad News Attacks

TUBE TALK With John Forde

When Bad News Attacks

There is no end to the despair, frustration and sheer boredom that watching TV news drives me to. After half an hour of watching Judy Bailey holding back the tears, or reporters shivering as they stand outside Parliament delivering some poorly researched speculation dressed up like a story, even TV2’s inane Big Brother looks like a tempting alternative.

But there’s a general election on, and, like it or not, we have to watch the news. Short of attending political party meetings, it’s the chief means by which our politicians can communicate their electoral campaigns. It’s also an excellent time to assess whether our broadcasters are doing their job properly.

In this review, I’ll focus – again – on TV1 news. As the government-funded broadcaster, it naturally should come under close scrutiny for how well it’s spending our taxpayer dollars.

If the coverage of the election date announcement was anything to go by, TV1 is setting itself up for another year of mediocre political reporting. After filming Helen’s announcement of the July 27 election date, One News reporters scuttled off to Opposition spokespeople for a “reaction” soundbite. Unsurprisingly, National, ACT and New Zealand snidely accused Helen Clark of cashing in on her party’s excellent polls results.

Was there any need for this? Isn’t it logical that a political leader should maximise on public popularity? It’s the Opposition’s job to pick holes in government policy, of course, but their comments – presented without commentary by One News – sounded pointlessly argumentative.

But this is news in the new millennium. One News’s formula seems to assume that each story must have an opposing point of view. By filming two people arguing, TV1 gets the appearance of objectivity, and saves having to present a well-researched commentary of their own.

In the same week, TV1 poked their cameras into the High Court, where Roby and Deborah Moorhead were sentenced to five years’ prison each for the manslaughter of their critically-ill son. It’s a perfect story for TV1’s pseudo-tabloid tastes – dead babies, religious “freaks” denying their child medical treatment, and the prospect of a grisly follow-up as they track the fate of Mrs. Moorhead’s pregnancy in prison.

TV1’s Sunday programme played into every cliché about the case, with a spectacularly bad follow-up story.

Reporter Janet McIntyre hunted down another religious couple who were similarly convicted of denying their son medical treatment for meningitis. After last-minute medical intervention, the child survived, miraculously without ongoing brain damage.

Bizarrely, McIntyre appeared to advocate the parents’ point of view. “Do you believe in the power of prayer in healing?” the glassy-eyed McIntyre smugly asked the child’s doctor. All very profound, Janet, but you’ve asking the wrong people the wrong questions. Were the Moorheads acting with the support of their church? Why were doctors and social workers unable to find them? But we don’t need to know this - Janet’s got a close-up of the dead child with heavenly music in the background instead.

And so it will continue, until TV1 learns that close-ups of crying victims and arguing for the sake of it makes juicy – but dumb – TV viewing. The thought of their election coverage already makes my fillings ache.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>