Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

David G. Miller Online


David G. Miller Online

Why America Suddenly Needs the UN

Despite its arguments to the contrary, the Bush Administration has been left with little choice but to call for United Nations assistance in policing and rebuilding Iraq. Earlier this year, it appeared that the future of the United Nations as a pre-eminent instrument in international affairs was at a cross -roads. Many commentators, myself included, felt that the Coalition’s unilateral action could seriously diminish the UN’s influence and even its relevance in world affairs however the actions of the Bush Administration in seeking UN help has forced a serious re-evaluation on this issue. The deteriorating situation in Iraq and the fact that the White House is now afraid that its forces will become bogged down in a costly guerrilla war has thrown the UN a lifeline that it must take to re-establish itself as the world body.

This change of stance on the part of the US and Britain has not been undertaken due to any sudden fondness for the United Nations or awareness that it is the correct authority to govern Iraq until a permanent government can be established and its economy resuscitated. This call has been taken because the US cannot maintain the post-war peace in Iraq. Guerrilla attacks are increasing and the Coalition is faced with a massive budgetary strain as the Treasuries in London and Washington find the billions needed to maintain their military presence. There is also the question of military over-stretch, especially as the allies have large commitments in other parts of the world, for example, West Africa, Afghanistan and the Korean Peninsula.

The problem facing the Bush Administration is that while it is seeking a heavy UN involvement it is not willing to compromise its position completely. The decision to keep the operation under US Command means that while the UN is being asked to contribute the bulk of the peace keeping forces, the US will keep its control over the country and will not place its forces under any UN administration. This is not a tempting bargain for UN member states who might of otherwise agreed to deploy troops and it will also increase the perception among the Ba’athist extremists that the UN is merely an instrument of American foreign policy. This was demonstrated by the recent bombing of the UN Headquarters in Baghdad. Mr. Bush has missed his opportunity to embark upon this course and as a result it is likely that the Coalition will have to increase its troop presence rather than decrease it.

In my July column I argued that it was crucial that the Coalition won the ‘hearts and minds’ of the Iraqi people. This campaign is more important than the initial military offensive that overpowered the Iraqi Armed Forces because if not undertaken correctly then the Coalition become regarded as occupiers and not liberators and this has the potential to draw their forces into a low-level war. The killing of several Iraqi police officers in a friendly fire incident in the Sunni triangle has damaged an already fragile and deteriorating relationship between the US and the Iraqi people and it will only serve as further incentive for those opposed to the US to carry out attacks.

The decision by the Polish Government to assume control and responsibility for the central region of Iraq is a bold move by Warsaw. Poland does have a solid peace keeping record however one can only assume that the decision it has taken has been motivated by the desire to secure along term US alliance and investment. The Poles may be serve under the UN banner and as a ‘blue helmet’ force however it is likely that could become a target for those still loyal to the old regime. It is not surprising that the name ‘al-Qaeda’ has surfaced in connection to the violence in Iraq although one cannot know for certain that elements of the group are operating there or on what level. Either way this is another opportunity for the reputation of this group to build and with each report that links an attack to al-Qaeda the aura and mystique around this movement grows. It is a dangerous cycle.

Despite Poland’s commitment and the negotiation that is currently underway in the UN it is unlikely that an agreement will be reached that allows the US to transfer the responsibility for Iraq to the world body and allow it to start removing its forces. France, Germany and Russia have already stated that they do not believe the draft resolution has gone far enough and will not agree to its passing. Hence the Coalition will have to remain committed to Iraq and will find it more difficult to pull out as the casualties mount. For its part, the UN is in a position to increase its bargaining power with the US and gain concessions from the White House that should have been granted before the war began. My prediction is that these efforts could easily fail. Not because of any weakness on the part of the UN or its inability to undertake the task set before it. Instead its failure will be due to the US’ lack of desire to see its own control of the Iraqi oil supply diminished and the country’s economic wealth taken out of its control.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Boris Johnson At Sea: Coronavirus Confusion In The UK

The tide has been turning against UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Oafishly, he has managed to convert that tide into a deluge of dissatisfaction assisted by the gravitational pull of singular incompetence. Much of this is due to such errors of ... More>>

Reese Erlich: Foreign Correspondent: Rightwing Populism Will Make You Sick—Really

The four countries with the most confirmed COVID-19 infections in the world are all led by rightwing populists: the US, India, Brazil, and Russia. Throw in the United Kingdom, which has the largest infection rate in Europe, and you have a common pattern. ... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Early Voting Is OK, If You Know Who To Vote For

Early voting is now open which is great for the 80% or so of the population whose vote does not change from one election to the next. They can go out and vote at their convenience without having to wait for election day. But for those who are yet even ... More>>

The Conversation: Biodiversity: Where The World Is Making Progress – And Where It’s Not

The future of biodiversity hangs in the balance. World leaders are gathering to review international targets and make new pledges for action to stem wildlife declines. Depending on whether you are a glass half-full or half-empty person, you’re likely ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Trump’s Current Chances Of Re-Election

By now it seems clear that National have no fresh ideas to offer for how New Zealand could avoid the Covid-19 economic crisis. As in the past, National has set an arbitrary 30% ratio of government debt to GDP that it aims to achieve “in a decade or so,” ... More>>

The Conversation: Rogue Poll Or Not, All The Signs Point To A Tectonic Shift In New Zealand Politics

Richard Shaw AAP(various)/NZ Greens (CC-BY-SA)/The Conversation Strong team. More jobs. Better economy. So say the National Party’s campaign hoardings. Only thing is, last Sunday’s Newshub-Reid Research poll – which had support for the Labour ... More>>

The Coronavirus Republic: Three Million Infections And Rising

The United States is famed for doing things, not to scale, but off it. Size is the be-all and end-all, and the coronavirus is now doing its bit to assure that the country remains unrivalled in the charts of infection . In time, other unfortunates may well ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Altars Of Hypocrisy: George Floyd, Protest And Black Face

Be wary what you protest about. The modern moral constabulary are out, and they are assisted by their Silicon Valley friends in the Social Media club. Should you dare take a stand on anything, especially in a dramatic way, you will be found out ... More>>

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog