Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Despite Fallujah The World Still Needs Mercenaries

David Miller Online

Despite Fallujah, The World Still Needs Mercenaries

The killing of Americans in Fallujah last week may prove to be the act of violence that draws American public opinion away from supporting the ongoing war in Iraq and could even cost George W. Bush the White House. The images of the mutilations rekindled memories of Somalia in 1993 except in this case the victims were private military contractors rather than service personnel. While there have been comparisons with Somalia and the ramifications for that mission, there has been little debate emerging over the use of private military contractors in Iraq and other trouble spots around the world. This is surprising given the negative publicity that often surrounds such activities often regarded as mercenary actions or the use of ‘soldiers for hire’. Nevertheless, the Fallujah killings are a demonstration that private contractors and soldiers are at risk as much as those in the armed forces but that they still play an important role in the world’s conflicts today.

Private contractors have been a feature in warfare for centuries and their role as hired guns has not changed. The Swiss Guard in the 15th Century fulfilled the same role that a company such as the US based Military Professionals Resource Incorporated and Blackwater does now, that is, sending personnel to serve in war zones for a price. The difference is that today’s private military organisations are marketed in a slick corporate fashion with services that include a host of military solutions ranging from battlefield leadership, training, tactical support and logistics. These companies have been active in trying to shift away from the perception of private contractors as freebooting, unruly armies running amok throughout Africa that has characterised them in many books and movies.

The debate over the use of mercenaries and whether the use is morally acceptable has not changed and a person’s perception often depends on their political orientation. However, despite this ongoing and seemingly never-ending debate the need for private soldiers has never been greater. This is due to three interlinking reasons. The first is the increasing reluctance of nations to commit their troops to war zones while the second reason is the failure of the United Nations in its peacekeeping efforts. The final point is that since 1990, warfare has become predominately intra-state and costly in terms of peacekeepers lives.

The undertaking of such missions by private contractors has gained currency with governments around the world. Washington now hires private contractors to handle support operations on most of its operational deployments. With a reduced body count amongst the military comes the diminished chance of public disillusion and voter backlash at the Presidential elections. The problem is that as the mercenary business has flourished the international legal framework that protects the contractors and those they work alongside has not developed. There is no current statute within international law that regulates or governs the actions of private military companies and as long as a company serves alongside the recognised government or regime then the label ‘mercenary’ does not apply. That only becomes an issue of the company is under contract to a rebel or non-government faction. Nor do those classified as mercenaries receive protection. If captured in a war zone then they will not be granted prisoner of war status under the Geneva Convention.

The situation in Iraq has heightened thrown the use of private contractors into sharper focus. This war, as with the one on terrorism, was not sanctioned by the United Nations and as more conflicts fall outside of the UN’s sphere fewer countries are likely to be willing to commit troops hence the need to recognise and accept the private soldier as an instrument of war. The opposition in New Zealand towards the war in Iraq has been intense and so has the resistance to the Government sending our forces there. However, the question that should be posed to those in opposition to the deployment is who or what body should keep the peace and try to maintain security in places such as Iraq. If it is not acceptable for our forces to be there then who should go in their place? The solution is private military companies.

Organisations, such as the UN, need to address the issue of soldiers for hire as it is one that is growing and heavily linked to the US defence establishment. There needs to be rules and laws for such activities that protect citizens of a country against any human rights violations that may be committed by private military personnel. Simply calling for an end to mercenary work or turning a blind eye is not good enough as it has been around for centuries and will continue to be. With so many votes at stake over conflict deployments and with the need to preserve soldiers lives having such political value, private soldiers will be in increasing demand. This is another reality of war.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>