Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Rice To Powell - Trading Credibility for Certitude

Rice To Replace Powell -- Trading Credibility for Certitude


By Angie Pratt

No one argues that Colin Powell isn't a man of integrity. When Colin Powell speaks the truth is expected. His sincerity is not questioned. His facts are expected to be facts, not hyped spin. That's why when he gave his speech to the UN about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq it was taken as being generally true.

At the same time, it is also a recognized fact that Colin Powell is the odd boy out at the Bush frat-house. His words while spoken with conviction were his and, as was shown numerous times, not necessarily those of his neoconservative boss. His diplomatic, reasoned approach has constantly been pushed aside for the "might makes right" approach of the far right ideologues that dominate the Bush administration.

By accepting Colin Powell's resignation and replacing him with Condoleezza Rice, George Bush is trading credibility for certitude.

No one argues that Condoleezza Rice doesn't have the full faith and backing of George Bush. She is a confidante of Bush. Her neoconservative credentials are impeccable. The fact that she speaks for the Bush administration will not be in doubt.

All will immediately know that her words are those of the White House. And her diplomatic parties will be well served from soup to nuts and from Brahms to Brahms -- a Brahms contemprorary prehaps said it best -- "a pedestal without a statue."

As such, Condoleezza Rice's new job is to front the Bush administration foreign policy positions to the world. In so doing, she will ride shotgun over the neoconservative philosophies that are replacing the tried and true method of "winning friends and influencing people" with "like it or lump it" diplomacy. "You're either with us or against us" is pretty self-explanatory.

The problem, of course, is she has no credibility. The whole world saw her spin away about WMDs last June on "Meet the Press" where her quote on the screen refuted what she had just said. For a short moment she was at a loss for words. We all know that her words have nothing to do with the truth but are all about PR.

So . when Condoleezza Rice takes over management of the U.S. leadership of the world, she will do so with an iron fist and not a velvet glove nor even a velvet tongue. You don't need the truth when you have force. You don't need to be right when you don't admit you're ever wrong. You don't have to be conciliatory when you don't care what others think.

The Fort Worth Star in its endorsement of Bush for president in October said that it did so because it thought that Bush would this time be the moderate he had claimed to be, the centralist that they thought they had endorsed in 2000. The Star was by no means the only newspaper that showed this same kind of naivete. It's about time that the United States wakes up to the fact that the Bush administration is radically to the right of center. It's about time that the United States realizes that past actions are a better predictor of the future than fairy stories from Bush loyalists.

The rest of the world already knows this. They have already come to grips with this reality. The fact that Condoleezza Rice is now going to be in charge of the State department is of no surprise to them.

"New blood!" "Bah Humbug!" The Bush Administration is quite happy with itself and sees no reason to change. Condoleezza Rice's nomination to be Secretary of State is simply further truth that it's going to be a cold four more years in foreign relations where other countries will be treated like domestics.

*************

Angie Pratt is an Arkansas writer with an abiding interest in politics

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Keith Rankin: Narrow Vision: Subsidised Cars And Street Immunity
Problems make the world go round. Many of us – maybe the majority of workers, and certainly the majority of well-paid workers – earn our living addressing problems. A problem-free world would represent a major crisis for modern social-capitalism. (Yet standard economic theory continues to present the productive economy as a mechanism for 'satisfying wants', as distinct from 'addressing problems... More>>


Biden In Tokyo: Killing Strategic Ambiguity
Could it have been just another case of bumbling poor judgment, the mind softened as the mouth opened? A question was put to US President Joe Biden, visiting Tokyo and standing beside Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida: “You didn’t want to get involved in the Ukraine conflict militarily for obvious reasons. Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?” The answer: “Yes. That’s a commitment we made.”.. More>>

Dunne Speaks: Robertson's Budget Gamble On Treasury
The popular test of the success or failure of Grant Robertson’s fifth Budget will be its impact on the soaring cost of living. In today’s climate little else matters. Because governments come and governments go – about every six to seven years on average since 1945 – getting too focused on their long-term fiscal aspirations is often pointless... More>>


Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>




The Conversation: Cheaper food comes with other costs – why cutting GST isn't the answer

As New Zealand considers the removal of the goods and services tax (GST) from food to reduce costs for low income households, advocates need to consider the impact cheap food has on the environment and whether there are better options to help struggling families... More>>