Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Groups Campaign to End Veneration of Columbus Day

Between the Lines Q&A
A weekly column featuring progressive viewpoints
on national and international issues
under-reported in mainstream media
for release Oct. 10, 2005

Groups Campaign to End Veneration of Columbus and Transform Holiday

Interview with Glenn Morris, of the Colorado American Indian Movement, conducted by Melinda Tuhus

Listen in RealAudio:
(Needs RealOne player or RealPlayer)

The second Monday of October marks Columbus Day celebrations across the nation, which only became a national holiday in 1971. But as the full history becomes better known about the man who is credited with "discovering" America, protesters have called for the abolition or transformation of the holiday away from one that honors a man guilty of genocide against Native Americans to one that has a more inclusive narrative. Some cities and states have already renamed the holiday Indigenous People's Day or American Indian Day.

Denver, Colo. is at the forefront of this struggle. There, the Alliance to Transform Columbus Day, led by the Colorado chapter of the American Indian Movement, or AIM, has been challenging the Columbus holiday since 1989. On Oct. 7th, the Alliance will hold their All Nations Four Directions solidarity rally, and the next day the group will protest Denver's annual Columbus Day parade.

Solidarity actions are now held in many other cities, both in the U.S. and in Latin America and Europe. Last year, a statue of Columbus in Caracas, Venezuela, was toppled by protesters. Between The Lines' Melinda Tuhus spoke with Glenn Morris of Colorado AIM about the history of the Columbus holiday and efforts now underway to transform it.

GLENN MORRIS: In Chicago in 1893, a very famous speech was given by Frederick Jackson Turner, an historian, about the close of the frontier. What that meant was that, the U.S. had finally, through the operation of Manifest Destiny, spread itself from the Atlantic to the Pacific coast. But there were other projects in the works to expand the U.S. beyond those borders, into the Pacific, into the Caribbean. The Spanish-American War happened six years later ? the United States seizes Cuba, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, the Philippines. This imperial expansion of the United States needed a poster boy, and at the world’s fair in 1893, Columbus became that poster boy. They said, "Who can we use as an icon of the notion that the United States is really a world power and the civilization of the United States needs to be expanded?" Well, all of the native people in the United States had already been “pacified,” and so Columbus becomes this icon.

So, we realized that in Denver, Columbus Day is really a celebration not of Columbus, the man, but of the idea of colonialism and of imperialism. We know there’s a continuous thread that runs from 1492 to the present, so actually the theme for this year’s protest is “Defeat Colum-Bush,” because we know that the policies of Columbus in terms of using God and the quest for natural resources in that time, gold, and glory and territorial acquisition, is very similar to the policies, for example, of the Bush administration in Iraq. So, we do try to make the connection. But we also try to educate people about why Columbus Day is destructive not just to native children, but to all children, because part of the critique in Denver is, how does a society remember its history and in what way is that history imparted to children?

BETWEEN THE LINES: Why has this movement developed in Colorado?

GLENN MORRIS: The Colorado American Indian Movement felt a particular responsibility to deal with this because Columbus Day began in Colorado. And so, in anticipation of the 500th anniversary, we began a four-year educational campaign in Denver. And so, by 1992, we had organized about 4,000 people to come together in downtown Denver and say, we are going to confront the Columbus Day parade if they have one, because this continued celebration without any kind of opposition is not going to go on. And we had such a strong outpouring of support that they actually cancelled the parade, the parade organizers.

And it didn’t return to Denver until 2000. And so, in 2000 there was civil resistance against the parade and 150 people were arrested. And, eventually, the city dropped the charges, and there have been subsequent protests each year since then. Last year, 250 people were arrested in an act of civil resistance in blocking the parade. Seven of us went on trial initially in January, and were acquitted by a jury, and then the city dropped the charges against everyone else, after our trial.

BETWEEN THE LINES: In most American cities that honor Columbus, the organizing group is most often Italian, because even though Columbus sailed for Spain, he was Italian. Is that true in Denver, as well?

GLENN MORRIS: There’s been this ongoing discussion in Denver about whether the parade is some kind of expression of Italian pride or whether it’s a celebration of Columbus and colonialism. The notion that Columbus Day was created somehow to honor Italians is a complete fabrication.

BETWEEN THE LINES: As I learned more about Columbus, I was struck by his combination of admiration for the native people he encountered ? he wrote about how handsome they were, how generous and noble ? and then, his willingness to treat them as less than human, and in fact to exterminate them. He’s also been implicated in helping to start the African slave trade.

GLENN MORRIS: We believe that a person who is personally responsible for that level of carnage against native people and beginning the African slave trade is deserving of no state or national holiday. And certainly, in 2005 there are more appropriate ideals or principles or even individuals to honor than Christopher Columbus. But even more important to us than that ? than Columbus the man, and whether or not he deserves a holiday ? is a discussion about the legacy of Columbus, because Columbus began a process in 1492 that has been continued by the United States Supreme Court, the United States Congress, settler states throughout the Americas that affect native peoples to this very day. This is not really a critique of Columbus the man; it’s a critique about how America remembers its history, and how that fallacious history then gets translated into law and policy that adversely affects native people to the present time.

For more information, call the Colorado chapter of the American Indian Movement office at (303) 832-2544 or visit their website at

Related links:

* "A People's History of the United States," book by Howard Zinn


Melinda Tuhus is executive producer of Between The Lines, which can be heard on more than 35 radio stations and in RealAudio and MP3 on our website at This interview excerpt was featured on the award-winning, syndicated weekly radio newsmagazine, Between The Lines for the week ending Oct. 14, 2005. This Between The Lines Q&A was compiled by Melinda Tuhus and Anna Manzo.



It's your future ... help make a difference against the corporate media's blackout of news and viewpoints like those in the interview above by helping us distribute to a wider audience in 2005! Please send your donation to:

Squeaky Wheel Productions, Inc. P.O. Box 110176 Trumbull, CT 06611

*** Please note: If you would like your donation to be tax-deductible, please make your check out to our fiscal sponsor, The Center for Global Communications Foundation Inc. (or The Global Center) and send to the above address.***

Or, if you wish to make a secure, online donation via PayPal, visit


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: The Major Questions Doctrine: The US Supreme Court Blunts The EPA
The US Supreme Court has been frantically busy of late, striking down law and legislation with an almost crazed, ideological enthusiasm. Gun laws have been invalidated; Roe v Wade and constitutional abortion rights, confined to history. And now, the Environmental Protection Agency has been clipped of its powers in a 6-3 decision.
The June 30 decision of West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency was something of a shadow boxing act... More>>

Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Dunne Speaks: "Let's Get Wellington Moving" Yeah, Right
There was great excitement in Wellington recently when the government finally announced – after much procrastination and indecision – its intentions for the ever so over-optimistically titled “Let’s Get Wellington Moving” plan... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>