Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Party-Maoist Alliance: Alarming Political Cocktail

Party-Maoist Alliance : An Alarming Political Cocktail

By Hari Bansha Dulal

The press release issued by the United States Embassy in Kathmandu on November 4 expressing the alarm over the possible alliance between Maoist and political parties has put agitating seven parties on a back foot. Different people depending on their political affiliation have different take on this issue of press release. If nothing, this recent press release has definitely served a purpose of reminder to some politicians of agitating seven political parties that are in a mad rush to grab power. There desperateness shows that they miss their heyday more than the need for well functioning democracy and freedom in Nepal. How can be someone so naïve to believe that alliance with Maoists will help us establish modern democratic society? For maoist, power comes from barrel of gun. Unlike people with faith on multi-party democracy, for maoist guerrillas, terror, is the key to power. They have an attachment to antique dogma which is much of an embarrassment even to present day Chinese government. Thus, any kind of alliance with Maoist insurgents is not only anti-democratic, but also morally repugnant.

Current remarks by responsible cadres of mainstream political parties on alliance with moist insurgents exhibits there desperateness for power rather than establishment of meaningful and stable democracy and democratic institutions in Nepal. They seem to have lost track of what they stand for. The latest press release may be a boomerang for those that are in desperate haste to power, but for the rest of the population that believe in multi-party democracy, it is the best possible intervention.

Let's assume a hypothetical scenario whereby alliance between Maoists and agitating political parties achieves its goal of republican set up in Nepal. What after the victory? Will Maoist lay down their arms and embrace multi-party democracy? Will they allow political parties that believe in multi-party democracy resort to peaceful means to power? There is no basis to trust these insurgents. They have time and again with drawn from there commitment and have committed crime against humanity. Madi scar is still a fresh and soil soaked with innocent blood has not dried yet. If this proposed alliance is allowed to take off, it will put entire Nepalese population in grave danger.

We shall be worse than what we are today. It could open a door for Maoist rule that can turn the nation into the world's next killing fields. A Nepal under control of Maoist rebels will be worse than what Nepalese people are confronting today. Let us not forget what is happening in other parts of the country that already is in insurgents' grasp. Abduction and recruitment of child soldier, establishment of labor camps, and ideological indoctrination of children in schools, assassination of journalists, teachers, and administration of justice through an unqualified tribunal have forced people to flee for their lives. Maoist insurgents' brutal ways of functioning has created a huge mass of internally displaced people. These displaced people are forced to live substandard life which they don't deserve at all. So, a million dollar worth question that we are confronting now with is, do we want to spend rest of our lives in constant fear and uncertainty? Do we want to raise our children under the shadow of a regime for whom forceful abduction and recruitment of child soldier is the best possible way to fight for a political change? Folks, we deserve better life for ourselves and generations to come.

As Maoists are against monarchy, some of our politicians might have thought that enemy's enemy is a friend. Political parties should not forget that maoists are supporting political parties not because they believe in multi-party democracy or they are genuinely interested in peaceful coexistence. They are supporting political parties because they can have an easy victory over political parties than king and his army in the later stage of there so called revolution. For now, with romantic cozy affair with political parties, they want to propagate the advocacy of democracy versus monarchy because it is really important for them to win big cities where agitating political parties have strong hold. They want to defeat stronger enemy which is king and his army with the help of weaker enemy first and then have decisive attack on the weaker enemy. There main aim is to settle for nothing less than a radical socialist republic. Thus, if political parties really want to establish a meaningful democracy in Nepal, they should reach out to their constituents and reinvigorate their bases rather than joining hands with rebels. Hands of these insurgents still bear strong smell of blood of Dikendra Thapa and innocent victims of madi massacre. Instead of joining hands with these Maoists insurgents, political parties should reform and apologize to Nepalese people for their past misdeeds and convince them to join the movement for democracy. This will slowly but surely win the hearts and minds of Nepalese people and energize them to participate in movement for democracy in Nepal. It may take few yeas to achieve this, but couple of years is not a long period in a history of a nation. Road to meaningful and stable democracy is not an easy one and everyone should work relentlessly rather than opting for a short cut. Democracy established through peoples' movement will be far more stable and meaningful than established through the help of radical Maoists' support.


Doctoral candidate, Environmental Science and Public Policy George Mason University, Virginia, USA.


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: The Major Questions Doctrine: The US Supreme Court Blunts The EPA
The US Supreme Court has been frantically busy of late, striking down law and legislation with an almost crazed, ideological enthusiasm. Gun laws have been invalidated; Roe v Wade and constitutional abortion rights, confined to history. And now, the Environmental Protection Agency has been clipped of its powers in a 6-3 decision.
The June 30 decision of West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency was something of a shadow boxing act... More>>

Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>

Dunne Speaks: "Let's Get Wellington Moving" Yeah, Right
There was great excitement in Wellington recently when the government finally announced – after much procrastination and indecision – its intentions for the ever so over-optimistically titled “Let’s Get Wellington Moving” plan... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>