Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Nepal: Agreement with Rejected Maoists Terrorists?

Agreement with Rejected Maoists Terrorists?

By U Raj Misra

May it be through Indian and International facilitation but finally the seven agitating parties (SAPs) have managed to do something. They must be given credit for managing to enter into an agreement with the Maoists, which they had failed to do for the last ten years. This agreement it seems has opened the way for them to exercise their political practices in the rural areas from where they were completely cut-off for the last few years. But the 12-point agreement between the Maoist and the seven parties does not spell out much action, except, the continuation of agitations in the streets as before with the involvement of the Maoist cadres. The "far reaching agreement" as it appears is nothing but just listing out the rhetoric that various quarters had been making for years. And the big question still remains unanswered – who is going to bell the cat?

Analyzing the twelve points of the agreement one can say that the only agenda agreed upon by the SAPs and the Maoists was to attack and weaken the institution of monarchy. This might be the reason why the Maoists have agreed to permit the SAPs into the villages so that the parties can fight their battle against the monarchy for them. This will also give the Maoist a chance to transform their cadres, deemed terrorists till now, into soldiers of democracy, to make their urban entry.

Reinstatement of the parliament, formation of all party government and elections for constituent assembly is the path which the SAPs and the Maoists have agreed upon. This roadmap is not new. In fact it is the same old rhetoric voiced by many ever since the last parliament was dissolved by Deuba government in 2002. As things stand now, neither the SAPs nor the Maoists have the legitimacy or the capacity to do so. The futility of the argument lies in the fact that there is no provision whatsoever in the constitution to make that happen nor is anyone in the position to resurrect the dissolved parliament. The only exception could be the King doing so by invoking Article 127, but we all know where that possibility stands. Absurdity about this agreement is that all the political players except Koirala have in the past termed restoration of parliament impossible. Agreeing to it now only shows their desperation.

Self-criticism or "atmalochana" by the SAPs and pledges that "they will not repeat the mistakes of the past", do not prove anything. Till the present, the parties have not taken any step to clean their ranks and file. The leaders are still seen as opportunists and corrupt. No single party has investigated or taken action against any of its corrupt members; neither has any party proven adequately that intra-party democracy exists. No party has made its financial transactions transparent. It is pathetic that they believe they can spearhead a "democratic movement" in the country with their tarnished image and that people will forget and forgive them on the basis of their atmalocana.

The same applies to the Maoists. It is foolish to believe that they have suddenly "realized their mistakes" and will be forgiven just like that. How have the Maoists proven that they are committed for this? Twice, in the past, they have declared ceasefire only to walk away from the peace talks and come about stronger. It was them who disrupted democratic process in the country. It was them who killed the elected representatives. It was them who attacked the government offices and it was them who dragged the military into the conflict. It was Prachanda who declared he hated "revisionism" and came out with Prachandapath, which the Maoists consider the "new path of creating communist utopia".

It was Baburam Bhattarai who publicly said, 10,000 deaths were nothing and that they were ready to give and take hundreds and thousands lives more, in order to achieve their goals. Is it possible to trust the Maoists only on the basis of one agreement with the SAPs? And what mechanism do the parties have to control the Maoists if they don't keep their promise? The points about disarming the Maoists and putting the Maoists militia and the RNA under UN or any reliable foreign supervision are equally debatable. Who is to ascertain that the Maoists have given up all the arms? Who is to put Maoists militia and the RNA under UN supervision? Do we know for certain that the Maoist leadership controls all its men with arms? What makes the parties believe that they can control the RNA if and after they have stripped the monarchy of its powers? Will the RNA agree to abide by the orders of the government that has come to power through a street agitation? Moreover, on what basis of legitimacy will such government invite "foreign force" to supervise a sovereign country's national army?

The only way by which all the points mentioned in the agreement can be realized is by putting in place a legitimate government, which can only be achieved through fresh elections. But the SAPs are not ready for elections. The fallacy is that SAPs were not ready for elections in 2002 after Deuba dissolved the parliament because of the Maoist and are not ready now because of the Monarchy. Before, their slogan was that, "elections cannot be held" and now when it has been announced they say, "they will prevent the elections." It is a paradox that the parties (and not surprisingly the Maoists) have called upon the people to sabotage the announced elections while simultaneously arguing that they are fighting for democracy! None of their arguments hold, if the SAPs have to "sabotage" the announced elections with the help of the Maoists.

It is positive that finally the parties have hit back to the arguments of the "mandales" that they are quislings. It is a heartening sign that they are ready to prove that they are as patriotic as any other political force in the country. But just as the "mandales" call them "muthi bhar ka dal"(minority), they can't just shrug off the presence of ultra, right wing, hardliners in the country. The parties cannot repeat the mistake made in 1990s. They have to be prepared to incorporate the right-wingers, as they are now ready to accommodate the Maoists in the system. It has to be understood that any accusations made against the parties are due to their actions in the past 15 years. It is time that the SAPs prove such allegations wrong and prove that they have the people's support.

And the only way to prove that, is by winning elections. As long as fresh elections are not conducted, we will never know the people's mandate. Only the newly elected government will have the political and the moral right to decide on any "long reaching consequences". It would be logical if the parties' andolan were directed towards facilitating free and fair polls rather than posing to attain their idealized version of democracy. The SAPs cannot refrain from elections and at the same time gain moral or political legitimacy to lead the country. If they boast they can rally the whole country behind them against the autocratic monarchic rule, they should also be able to transfer the support into votes. As long as the SAPs refrain from elections, a positive and sustainable solution cannot be attained.


(The author is a student of international relations at SAIS ( School of Advanced International Studies) of Johns Hopkins University, Washington D.C.)

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Reese Erlich: Foreign Correspondent: U.S. Capitol Insurrection As Seen From Abroad

In the wake of the white nationalist mob takeover of the U.S. Capitol and Trump’s pending second impeachment, I contacted journalists and activists overseas to get an idea of how the rest of the world currently views us.... More>>

Ian Powell: Health Restructuring Threatens Patient Voice

The opportunity for public voice is vital for the effective functioning of New Zealand’s health system. Inevitably voice boils down to the accessibility quality of comprehensive healthcare services for patients both at an individual treatment and population health ... More>>

Boris Johnson At Sea: Coronavirus Confusion In The UK

The tide has been turning against UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Oafishly, he has managed to convert that tide into a deluge of dissatisfaction assisted by the gravitational pull of singular incompetence. Much of this is due to such errors of ... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Encircling China And Praising India: The US Strategic Framework For The Indo-Pacific

The feeling from Rory Medcalf of the Australian National University was one of breathless wonder. “The US government,” he wrote in The Strategist , “has just classified one of its most secretive national security documents - its 2018 strategic framework ... More>>

The Conversation: The Numbers Suggest The Campaign For Cannabis Reform In NZ Will Outlive The Generations That Voted Against It

Like Brexit in the UK, cannabis reform in New Zealand fell into an age gap — given time, a second referendum would probably succeed. More>>

  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog