Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Viable Solutions For Israeli-Palestinian Peace

Viable Solutions For Israeli-Palestinian Peace


By Sonia Nettnin

(Chicago) – Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Professor Jeff Halper spoke about the Israel-Palestine conflict and viable solutions to bring peace to the Middle East.

Halper is Coordinator of The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, an Israeli, direct-action organization that resists nonviolently the demolition of Palestinian houses in the Occupied Territories. According to Halper, Israeli forces have demolished over 14,000 Palestinian homes since 1967. The ICAHD brings Israelis, Palestinians and internationals together to rebuild Palestinian homes.

“In Israel’s framing the land of Israel belongs exclusively to the Jewish people - Arabs reside there by sufferance and not by right,” Halper said. “Israel appears as a Western country but it’s not.” The issue of exclusivity is the underlying principle of Zionism and Israeli Government policy. However, it does not necessarily reflect the predominant views of the Israeli public, whose main concern is security.

The implementation of Israeli Government policy is the occupation of an estimated four million Palestinians, who are imprisoned in what Halper describes, is a complex, control matrix of checkpoints, roadblocks, watchtowers, terminals, trenches, settler-only roads, patrolled roads, fences, and a wall that stands 26-feet high. Israel’s wall is five times longer than the Berlin Wall.

Israeli occupation controls Palestinian lives and confiscates Palestinian land for Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. As a result, Palestinians in the West Bank live in a truncated mini-state – a Bantustan – which has 70 enclaves in three, noncontiguous cantons of land.

In April 2006, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert presented his convergence plan (also referred to as the consolidation plan and later coined the realignment plan) in the U.S. where it was accepted by U.S. Congress. The bottom line of the plan is that Israel would maintain vast settlement blocks within the West Bank, which are on top of the richest agricultural lands and on water aquifers. These Israeli settlement blocks are beyond the 1967 borders and cut deep into the West Bank (also referred to as Judea and Samaria by Israelis).

According to Halper an estimated 500,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank.
Construction of the wall and Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Jordan Valley continues unabated.

“It’s hard to believe this is a long-term sustainable solution,” Halper said. Palestinians would have no border with an Arab country. Moreover they would have no water, territorial contiguity, or any control of air space, communication spheres, which Halper explains, “is really a prison state.”

So what does Halper and the ICAHD see as viable solutions to the conflict?

They believe there will be no solution or security without the following conditions: national expression for both peoples (nations); economic viability; conformity with human rights international and UN resolutions; refugees’ rights (acknowledgement, just resolution, regional approach); and regional security concerns addressed for both Israelis and Palestinians.

And what are the options that would bring peace to the Middle East?

According to the ICAHD, option one is a viable two-state solution. More than 60 per cent of Palestinians are under 18 and a future Palestinian state has to provide an economy, jobs, and a future with no violence. Halper says there would need to be healing and reconstruction - trauma therapy in a national sense. The issue of viability is just as important as sovereignty because the people need access to Jerusalem, the epicenter of the Palestinian economy, along with territorial contiguity, water, air space etc. He added that the Palestinian Diaspora is affluent and highly-educated and they are a great resource for rebuilding a Palestinian state.

ICAHD’s option two is Apartheid - a threatening but real possibility. Israel’s convergence plan locks Palestinians into a Bantustan. “We have to oppose this kind of so-called solution to emerge because it’s not sustainable,” Halper added.

Option three is one democratic state, which Halper sees as a nonstarter for Israel.

“I love the one-state idea,” Halper said. “I think it’s a real challenge for all of us, how to live together, a nice idea, but the international community may not agree…Israel being transformed from an ethnic state to a democratic state.”

The final option is a regional confederation with Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon as the confederation’s members. Halper calls this the “two-stage” solution.
This regional economic confederation would enable people to live and work within these countries regardless of their citizenship. There could be regulations as to how long a person could work in a neighboring country and the confederation’s members would determine the parameters.

For example, thousands of Polish people from Poland live and work in France, but they have no plans to live in France permanently. Halper believes Europe could adopt the Middle East regional confederation plan as a project. Why? Europe has a lot of experience in developing mechanisms to protect weaker economies, and Europe can help the Middle East work together as a confederation for regional economic prosperity.

“Europeans should take this as a project with American US support,” Halper said. “It would be exciting.”

However, such a regional confederation requires integration, which would be a hard sell to Israel despite the potential economic opportunities.

Halper sees the regional concept as an inspiring vision of the relationship between a person’s roots and the global village because “…it could be a model for how to address tensions and conflicts.”

In the meantime, the ICAHD focuses on what they call “pro-active meta-campaigns,” which involves reaching out to civil society. Through informational campaigns the ICAHD discusses issues such as boycott, divestment, arms sanctions on Israel (fourth in arms exports worldwide), the Palestinian narrative, occupation, convergence as Apartheid, impact of conflict on US/global interests, and anti-apartheid campaigns.

Halper hopes these initiatives will bring peace to the Middle East.

The American Friends Service Committee nominated Halper for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006.

*************

-Journalist Sonia Nettnin writes about social, political, economic, and cultural issues. Her focus is the Middle East.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Dunne Speaks: Robertson's Budget Gamble On Treasury
The popular test of the success or failure of Grant Robertson’s fifth Budget will be its impact on the soaring cost of living. In today’s climate little else matters. Because governments come and governments go – about every six to seven years on average since 1945 – getting too focused on their long-term fiscal aspirations is often pointless... More>>

Keith Rankin: Liberal Democracy In The New Neonationalist Era: The Three 'O's
The proposed ‘New Zealand Income Insurance Scheme’ (‘the scheme’) has attracted strong debate among the more left-wing and liberal groupings, within New Zealand-Aotearoa. This debate should be seen as a positive rather than negative tension because of the opportunity to consider and learn from the implications and sharpen advocacy... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Words Matter, Prime Minister
Words matter, especially when uttered by politicians. History is littered with examples of careless or injudicious words uttered by politicians coming back to haunt them, often at the most awkward of times. During the 1987 election campaign, when electoral reform was a hot issue, Prime Minister David Lange promised to have a referendum on the electoral system... More>>


Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>




The Conversation: Cheaper food comes with other costs – why cutting GST isn't the answer

As New Zealand considers the removal of the goods and services tax (GST) from food to reduce costs for low income households, advocates need to consider the impact cheap food has on the environment and whether there are better options to help struggling families... More>>