Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Sinead Dumigan: Hep B & CDC’s expendable children

Profitable Punishment:
Hep B and the CDC’s “expendable” children

By Sinead Dumigan

Luke 10:3 Go: Behold I send you as lambs amongst wolves

Society has inadvertently witnessed the most gruesome and belligerent attacks imaginable; a massacre of innocence executed with such spite and audacity, yet hidden meticulously by a protected veil of secrecy.

Mandatory vaccination has forever altered the beauty of childhood, but the true deception lies within the ironic twist of events stemming from a parent’s attempts to protect the life of their child. Oblivious to the evil at work, parents follow vaccine stipulations with a blind faith, finding solace only in hearing their children have been spared from the pain and desperation such diseases inflict.

Never before has reality been so critically distorted; with every secret comes a stream of tears. It is too late coming for many, but truth remains the only hope for the future of humanity.

The alleged Hepatitis B virus (HBV) threat to infants is, quite possibly, a new low for the American government, which, in itself, is a difficult task to accomplish, but especially since the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) indicates high risk populations as "sexually active ... adults with more than one sex partner … or have a history of sexually transmitted disease; homosexual or bisexual men; illicit injection drug users … at occupational risk … hemodialysis patient … clients and staff of institutions.”

Generally, and with as much sarcasm as can be conveyed, not too many newborns fit any of the profiles mentioned above.

Moreover, citizens are given the impression that HBV infections are life threatening, but in all actuality, roughly 50% of those exposed show no symptoms at all; while another 30% experience flu-like symptoms for a few weeks, but both recover entirely and develop lifelong immunity in the process.

The residual 20% of people exposed to HBV may develop jaundice, nausea, abdominal pain, fever, appetite loss, fatigue, itching, or in serious cases, liver cancer or cirrhoses.

Now, of those 20% who do experience these symptoms, 95% will recover completely leaving only 5% as chronic carriers, which, completely contradicts the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) statement in 1991, that "1 million-1.25 million persons with chronic HBV infection in the United States are potentially infectious to others,” along with the American Medical Association’s (AMA) 1994 statement that "more than 4,000 people die each year from hepatitis B related liver disease … before … vaccine, over 30,000 children were infected annually”.

In any case, Hepatitis B vaccines (Hep B) have evolved into an accepted part of a newborns life, but only when the motives for such a recommendation are exposed can parents truly comprehend the disgrace that is mandatory inoculation.

In view of pre-mandate data establishing the U.S. had maintained one of the lowest incidence rates of HBV infection (0.1% to 0.5%) for decades, combined with additional information showing a 10% decrease in annually reported cases since 1986, officials were well aware that their ploy would require some serious “encouragement” for it to have any chance of being accepted.

Therefore, the CDC preempted impending resistance by issuing a report warning the public that an estimated 200,000-300,000 new hepatitis B infections occurred annually during the period 1980-1991.

Though, what officials failed to mention was that according to the 2001 paper, Incidence of Hep B Virus in USA, “national estimates of hepatitis B incidence are corrected for underreporting using an algorithm that adjusts incidence upward by approximately 6-fold … this item is not amenable to survey data collection due to low incidence."

In reality, out of the 3.9 million births in 1996, there were only 54 cases of infant HBV, making the occurrence rate a meager 0.001%; though, as time would reveal, during the same year, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) shows 1,080 infants suffered serious reactions to Hep B injections, among those are 47 families who will never see their babies again because they died.

Nonetheless, the damage had already been done. In 1991, the ACIP of the CDC, along with help from the American Academy of Pediatric (AAP), successfully persuaded state health officials to issue mandates compelling every child entering daycare or school to show proof they had received three doses of Hep B.

As 1997 came to a close, 35 states had vaccination requirements for school children; yet, prenatal screening, the one sure way to minimize HBV transmission, was mandated in only 15 states, according to the National Vaccine Information Center.

Clearly, America’s health was not the driving force behind the calamity of mass vaccination.

Organizations such as the Hepatitis B Coalition, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, World Health Organization, All Kids Count, Children’s Vaccine Initiative, CDC, FDA, state health officials, drug manufacturers, doctors, nurses, and even pharmacists glorified and pushed infant vaccination until Americans had been infiltrated lock, stock, and barrel; all in attempts to prevent a condition where infants "represented <10% of all HBV infections before implementation of childhood immunization programs,”according to the Immunization Action Coalition.

Apparently, at least through the eyes of these poison peddlers, sacrifices are a necessary evil in the era of injections. Its amazing how lucrative children, combined with the fear of disease can be; this is the only explanation as to how FDA officials accepted such pathetic, half ass “safety tests” as the basis for approving Hep B vaccines.

Merck & Co. frequently benefits from this lenience, as FDA members were satisfied with previous safety tests that concluded there was a “possibility that broad use of vaccine could reveal adverse reactions not observed in clinical trials … unknown whether the vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant woman or affect reproduction capacity … not known whether the vaccine is excreted in human milk … specific data are not yet available for the simultaneous administration of RECOMBIVAX HB with other vaccines,” according to the 1996 product insert.

Basically, all researchers were able to establish from Merck’s initial safety test was that 1636 doses were administered to 653 healthy children (up to 10 years of age), and within 5 days of each injection, 17% of patients reported having adverse reactions, according to the National Vaccine Information Center.

Keeping in mind the cohort was identified as being up to 10 years of age, this safety test was the foundation for the CDC’s infant recommendation. Though, when asked to show evidence that inoculating a newborn baby was safe, a vaccine manufacturers representative confessed, “We have none. Our studies were done on 5- and 10- year olds."

Adding to insults was a 1994 Institute of Medicine publishing, Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines, focusing on Hep B testing limitations, which revealed that “individual trials usually involved a few hundred subjects for study … when larger vaccination programs were monitored, observations of adverse events were necessarily less detailed and less accurately reported … studies were not designed to assess serious, rare adverse events; the total number of recipients is too small and the follow-up generally too short."

Disturbing indeed but seeing that actions speak louder than words, the mendacity was evident long before any formal confession was presented.

Perhaps best said by Dr. Xavier Raspail back in 1888, quoted in the 2004 paper, Principles of Vaccination, by the National Health Federation, “Are we not poisoning humanity in small doses? It is diabolical that we are inflicting all these infections that have assaulted human beings at one time or another. It is stupefying this arrogant introduction into the blood of a cocktail of germs when for the slightest surgical operation we wage unremitting war against them."

More specifically, in 1971, Hollinger et al reported that antiviral antibodies, like those found in Hep B vaccines, were associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), then in 1973, Weiner et al further corroborated concerns by declaring the panel had successfully induced the pathogenesis of demyelination using a mouse hepatitis virus.

Today, one would find it difficult to count the number of reported postvaccinal SLE, demyelinating disorders, and countless other conditions, but when confronted on such findings, officials have repeatedly dismissed these accounts as nothing more than coincidences.

At any rate, there is one caution impossible to denounce; that came in 1988 from none other than Dr. Maurice Hilleman, developer of the Hep B vaccine. “The message from the hypothetical hepatitis B example is that the administration of antigens or monoclonal antibodies that directly or indirectly raise antibodies that attach to host cell receptors may carry large liabilities … may invite the same kinds of adverse responses that are believed to be responsible for a variety of autoimmune disorders." How right he was.

Subsequently, in 1988, Shaw et al conducted a post surveillance study focusing on the neurologic reactions to Hep B vaccination. The findings included 10 cases of Bell’s palsy, 10 Guillain-Barre Syndrome, 9 lumbar neuropathy, three brachial plexus neuropathy, three optic neuritis, and four cases of transverse myelitis.

Albeit, upon reading the ingredients in Hep B inoculations, the shock no longer lies in recognizing the fact that children are being damaged by vaccinations, but rather in knowing there are children who actually walk away unscathed from a chemical invasion of this extent.

Never in a million years could parents prepare themselves for the veracity lying within vaccine--formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, thimerosal, bovine (calf) proteins, monkey kidney tissue cultures, human diploid tissue cultures, and phenoxyethanol just to name a few.

To think these children are not being affected is just ridiculous.

Alas, compliments of the VAERS, the “hypothetical” risks of vaccination have been long since transformed into actual reports, complete with name, age, and outcome. Hep B accounts for more documented complaints than any other vaccine available, and as said by Dr. Jane Orient, in testimony before a Congressional Committee, "the risk of a serious vaccine reaction many be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B."

Michael Belkin, father of a precious Hep B casualty, also testified before Congress that the “total 24,775 VAERS Hepatitis B reports from July 1990 to October 31, 1998 show 439 deaths and 9673 serious reactions …17,497 of those total reports … Hepatitis B vaccines only, the remainder were vaccine cocktails where hepatitis B was administered along with DPT, HIB, IPV, OPV, etc."

In the wake of all these deaths and injuries, the hepatitis B vaccine maker, Merck, makes about $1 billion a year from vaccines sales.

This scandal is one of such magnitude that exposure is inevitable, and compensation impossible; creations darkest hours are upon us, and the stench of moral decay will linger until our children are protected and treasured like the miracles they truly are.

Knowledge is power, and in this day and age—power is everything.


By Sinead Dumigan
s_locky12 @

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Dunne Speaks: Robertson's Budget Gamble On Treasury
The popular test of the success or failure of Grant Robertson’s fifth Budget will be its impact on the soaring cost of living. In today’s climate little else matters. Because governments come and governments go – about every six to seven years on average since 1945 – getting too focused on their long-term fiscal aspirations is often pointless... More>>

Keith Rankin: Liberal Democracy In The New Neonationalist Era: The Three 'O's
The proposed ‘New Zealand Income Insurance Scheme’ (‘the scheme’) has attracted strong debate among the more left-wing and liberal groupings, within New Zealand-Aotearoa. This debate should be seen as a positive rather than negative tension because of the opportunity to consider and learn from the implications and sharpen advocacy... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Words Matter, Prime Minister
Words matter, especially when uttered by politicians. History is littered with examples of careless or injudicious words uttered by politicians coming back to haunt them, often at the most awkward of times. During the 1987 election campaign, when electoral reform was a hot issue, Prime Minister David Lange promised to have a referendum on the electoral system... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>

The Conversation: Cheaper food comes with other costs – why cutting GST isn't the answer

As New Zealand considers the removal of the goods and services tax (GST) from food to reduce costs for low income households, advocates need to consider the impact cheap food has on the environment and whether there are better options to help struggling families... More>>