Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Bolton Leaves UN: Hated By Some, Admired By Others

Bolton Leaves The United Nations: Hated By Some, Admired By Others

By Andreas von Warburg

UNITED NATIONS – Ambassador John Bolton is one of President Bush’s most fiercely opposed appointments. Despised by many when he took office at the United Nations in 2005; praised somewhat like a star now that he’s resigning… so much so that several of his fellow ambassadors have almost given him a vote of confidence.

“I enjoy working with him,” Ambassador Wang Guangya, China’s Permanent Representative at the UN, told reporters after Bolton resigned. “I think he was serious about the American objective of reforming the United Nations, and he pushed hard. But, of course, sometimes in order to achieve that objective, you have to work together with others.”

Bolton and Guangya are not exactly friends. The two clashed on many issues at the Security Council – namely the nuclear debate around Iran and North Korea, and issues related to the respect of human rights – and often scorned each other in front of the cameras. “I regret that he's resigning, he works very hard and has his own style,” Wang said.

Bolton’s shot-clock abrasive style earned him true admiration from Security Council allies, who credited him with helping pass hard-line resolutions on the North Korea and Iran’s question, as well as the Lebanon crisis.

“I would say we have always respected each other and we were able to work together, especially on 1701 [Lebanon],” Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sablière, France's Permanent Representative to the UN, said about Bolton. And comments from his Japanese counterpart have also been laudatory: “John Bolton was spearheading on a number of important issues. And as far as Japan was personally concerned, the North Korean missile launch in July and nuclear test in October, he really spearheaded this effort to get a Security Council resolution adopted, in a very speedy and efficient manner.”

Bolton’s “bare-knuckled diplomacy” – as the Washington Post calls it – was as undiplomatic as it could be, but helped the Security Council speed up the process and increase transparency. However, his style and brutality contributed to distance the US Administration from the UN leadership, from Secretary-General Kofi Annan and the Deputy Secretary-General in particular. Asked by reporters to comment on Bolton’s departure, Mark Malloch Brown, Annan’s right-hand-man and one of Bolton’s fiercest critics, strongly declined any comment.

“I think Ambassador Bolton did the job he was expected to do,” Annan said more diplomatically, whose second term expires December 31, the same day the US Ambassador will leave his post. “As a representative of the U.S. government, he pressed ahead with the instructions that he had and tried to work as effectively as he could with the other ambassadors.”

Bush reportedly asked White House lawyers to study all possible alternatives to keep John “the hawk” Bolton in office. However, since Bolton was a recess appointee, made without the support of the Senate, Bush could have renewed the ambassador’s mandate only by asking Bolton to renounce a salary. To overcome this obstacle, the Administration considered naming Bolton “something different” and pay him “on the side in a private capacity,” as Fox News reported last night.

Now that Bolton’s resignations have been accepted by the President, many are speculating on his successor. One of the most recurring names is that of US Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad, an Afghan native who also served as top US diplomat in Kabul. But other contenders seem very interested in the position: Jim Leach, a former Republican congressman who lost the elections last November and publicly supported by Democrats for replacing Bolton, and Paula Dobriansky, undersecretary of state for democracy and global affairs.

Whoever will replace Ambassador Bolton, filling his shoes won’t be easy. Bolton is loved by the press and is a natural in dealing with the Security Council.

Bolton's successor will have to be as resolute as he was, without being abrasive. The hardest task would be to close the gap with the UN Administration and poor countries, while keeping close friends with the other four Security Council veto-barer permanent members. And the new Ambassador should keep in mind that the General Assembly is not a secondary UN body, but an important piece of the puzzle just like the Security Council.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: The Major Questions Doctrine: The US Supreme Court Blunts The EPA
The US Supreme Court has been frantically busy of late, striking down law and legislation with an almost crazed, ideological enthusiasm. Gun laws have been invalidated; Roe v Wade and constitutional abortion rights, confined to history. And now, the Environmental Protection Agency has been clipped of its powers in a 6-3 decision.
The June 30 decision of West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency was something of a shadow boxing act... More>>


Ian Powell: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?

On 19 June the Sunday Star Times published my column on the relationship between the Labour government’s stewardship of Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system and the outcome of the next general election expected to be around September-October 2023: Is the health system an electoral sword of Damocles for Labour... More>>


The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>