Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Martin LeFevre: Questioning Atheism

Meditations - From Martin LeFevre in California

Questioning Atheism

The pristinely clear and cold stream flows by at my feet, its brown and reddish stones burnished by the fresh current and glistening in the sunlight. A woodland hawk soars through the bare branches of the oaks and sycamores, and alights on a limb near the bank on the other side.

Though the park is merely a quarter mile wide strip cutting through the middle of this rapidly growing college town, the wind through the bare trees is almost the only sound I hear, other than the current gurgling by.

Three laborers—young men in florescent jackets and hooded sweatshirts—pull up across the creek in a truck and trailer loaded with gear. They grab their lunches and walk the 30 meters into the picnic site. The roughest looking one, with sunglasses on and hood up, looks across at the man sitting incongruously in the sun on the opposite bank. He stares for a few seconds, and then waves in a surprisingly friendly manner.

A meditative state ignites, and a strong feeling of affinity for all things surges through me. Indeed, it seems to flow through and pour out of one at the same time. There is only one word for it, love, though I’m reluctant to use it.

Someone wrote me recently and matter of factly stated she was an atheist. Since I most often meet up with believers who think I’m a heretic or apostate, I wondered what she meant by atheism. To my mind, belief in God, or non-belief in God, are two sides of the same coin; neither has anything to do with discovering the truth of the matter.

Christians believe God started the whole shebang, and is letting things play out in a mechanistic universe, with humans having “free will,” and God directly intervening from time to time. Does atheism mean not believing in such a separate ‘Creator,’ a ‘Supreme Being?’ If so, I understand and am in accord with this kind of ‘a-theism,’ since there is no such Deity.

Or is atheism the belief that the universe is simply a random, mechanistic, and deterministic interaction of particles and waves, which for humans means there is nothing beyond the ‘mind of man’? To my mind, that, as much as any belief (for indeed it is a belief) is a projection of thought, maintaining ‘man’ and self at the center of the universe.

Doubt is the most important quality for a genuinely spiritual person, the capacity for continually questioning oneself and the challenges of life. However, few people, whether secular or so-called religious, can sustain such doubt. The human mind has a need for certainty, which very often comes at the expense of truth, leading to a fixed set of beliefs and ideas, one way or another.

Even the mindset that “it’s all relative” (that is, personally subjective) is a belief system that closes out enquiry, insight, and growth. But can a minority of people live that way—questioning everything, settling on nothing?

Of course doubt can go too far and paralyze the mind. Having regularly experienced something beyond thought since my late teens, I’m sure there is an infinite intelligence that is inseparable from nature (and only separable from humans because we live in the habitual separativeness of thought). My doubt has been whether that intelligence is utterly indifferent to humanity.

I feel that sentient creatures such as us, creatures in whom the power of ‘higher thought’ has evolved, pose a riddle not just for us, but also for the universe itself. How can the universe evolve a creature at odds with its basic nature?

The universe is an incomprehensibly vast and many-layered movement in wholeness, in which ‘disorder’ and randomness play a part. But humans, who evolved along with all other life, represent a deep contradiction, since we are generating a new kind of disorder, and destroying this beautiful planet.

Does humanity's ultimate fate matter to the universe? If there is something beyond thought, and the human brain has the capacity to perceive it, then it stands to reason that the answer is yes, up to a point.

Ordinary human beings can and must awaken intelligence within us, and resolve this existential contradiction.

************

- Martin LeFevre is a contemplative, and non-academic religious and political philosopher. He has been publishing in North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe (and now New Zealand) for 20 years. Email: martinlefevre@sbcglobal.net. The author welcomes comments.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

The First Attack On The Independents: Albanese Hobbles The Crossbench
It did not take long for the new Australian Labor government to flex its muscle foolishly in response to the large crossbench of independents and small party members of Parliament. Despite promising a new age of transparency and accountability after the election of May 21, one of the first notable acts of the Albanese government was to attack the very people who gave voice to that movement. Dangerously, old party rule, however slim, is again found boneheaded and wanting... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Predictable Monstrosities: Priti Patel Approves Assange’s Extradition
The only shock about the UK Home Secretary’s decision regarding Julian Assange was that it did not come sooner. In April, Chief Magistrate Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring expressed the view that he was “duty-bound” to send the case to Priti Patel to decide on whether to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 grafted from the US Espionage Act of 1917... More>>

Digitl: Are we happy living in Handy's Age of Unreason?
In 1989 Charles Handy wrote The Age of Unreason. It's a book that looked forward to a time where telecommuting would be an everyday reality. We live in that world today, although we use the term working from home. The book contains other predictions that were on the money... More>>


Dunne Speaks: Roe V. Wade Blindsides National

Momentum is everything in politics, but it is very fragile. There are times when unexpected actions can produce big shifts and changes in the political landscape. In 2017, for example, the Labour Party appeared headed for another hefty defeat in that year’s election until the abrupt decision of its then leader to step aside just weeks before the election. That decision changed the political landscape and set in train the events which led to Labour being anointed by New Zealand First to form a coalition government just a few weeks later... More>>

Digitl: Infrastructure Commission wants digital strategy
Earlier this month Te Waihanga, New Zealand’s infrastructure commission, tabled its first Infrastructure Strategy: Rautaki Hanganga o Aotearoa. Te Waihanga describes its document as a road map for a thriving New Zealand... More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Leaking For Roe V Wade
The US Supreme Court Chief Justice was furious. For the first time in history, the raw judicial process of one of the most powerful, and opaque arms of government, had been exposed via media – at least in preliminary form. It resembled, in no negligible way, the publication by WikiLeaks of various drafts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership... More>>