Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Constitutional Showdown Over US Attorney Firings?

Constitutional Showdown Over US Attorney Firings?


By Deniz Yeter
t r u t h o u t | Report
From: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032307B.shtml

Friday 23 March 2007

Democrats push for cooperation while the White House stalls for time, accusing them of pushing a partisan agenda.

The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the authorization for subpoenas earlier today to be issued for Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, and other top White House aides, following the House Judiciary Subcommittee's approval on Wednesday.

The authorization is in response to the White House's refusal to cooperate by having key White House officials appear before Congress, citing that they will only allow Rove, Miers, and others to appear behind closed doors, without being sworn under oath and without a transcript.

Appearing on CNN yesterday, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) responded to the White House's offer, saying that, "It's sort of giving us the opportunity to talk to them, but not giving us the opportunity to get to the bottom of what really happened here."

"With no transcript, with no oath, with private conversations that can be contradicted, recollections can fail, you're not going to get very far."

Senator Leahy (D-Verm.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also responded to the White House's offer by saying: "They came up and said, 'This is our offer. Take it or leave it. Accept these papers where we've erased 100 pages or more so you don't even know what's on there. Do a closed door hearing where the public has no idea what is said and they're not under oath, and if you don't like that, take it or leave it.' Well nobody's going to take that."

Facing the likelihood of the Democratic Congress issuing subpoenas, White House Spokesman Tony Snow promised that, "If they issue subpoenas, the offer's withdrawn."

President Bush has also promised to fight the Democrats in court if they issue subpoenas, taking the matter all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary, to protect his executive privilege.

This could effectively stall the matter for months or even years, when the president and his officials are no longer in office.

The Supreme Court battle would test the validity of President Bush's newly expanded, post-9/11 executive powers against Congress's authority to oversight guaranteed under the country's constitution.

In the past, President Bush has used this same presidential power to deny the 9/11 Commission the ability to have Condoleezza Rice testify under oath, but previously stated that it wouldn't set any precedent for his ability to do so in the future.

Lawmakers from both sides are meeting today in an attempt to avert a potential confrontation and strike a deal that will please both sides, though the prospects of such a deal are looking a bit grim.

When reached for comment, David Carle at Senator Leahy's office commented that, "Subpoenas will be issued if they're needed, but ideally the senator hopes it doesn't have to come to that."

When asked about the possibility of a constitutional showdown over the matter, Mr. Carle responded, "The Senator wishes not to speculate over the matter, but again, we hope it doesn't have to come to this," and that the White House will cooperate.

David Carle also stated that presidential advisers from Carter to Clinton have testified before Congress on 74 occasions in recent history.

According to an October 6, 2004 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report from the Library of Congress, the Bush administration has already refused this request from Congress on 8 occasions.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>