Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Dems Subpoena DOJ in Attorney Firing Investigation

Democrats Subpoena DOJ in Attorney Firing Investigation


By Matt Renner
t r u t h o u t | Report
From: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041107A.shtml

Wednesday 11 April 2007

Democrats in the US House of Representatives served a subpoena on Tuesday demanding all previously undisclosed documents relating to the firings of eight US attorneys in 2006. The Senate is considering a similar action.

The subpoena requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to turn over all documents pertaining to the Congressional investigation. The DOJ voluntarily provided more than 3,000 pages of emails to Congress in March. But instead of satisfying critics of the attorney firings, these documents raised new questions.

The documents had many sections blacked-out, and while referencing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Presidential Adviser Karl Rove, the documents did not include any of their correspondence. The release also excluded any emails during the 18-day stretch from November 15 to December 4, 2006 leading up to the week the firings took place. The subpoena requires the DOJ to turn over complete, uncensored versions of the previous emails as well as any emails or other correspondence that might have occurred during the 18-day gap.

In a letter accompanying the subpoena, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman John Conyers (D-Michigan) states: "The incomplete response we have received thus far falls far short of what is needed for the committee to effectively exercise their oversight responsibilities.... The [Justice] Department has not indicated any meaningful willingness to find a way to meet our legitimate needs, and at this point, further delay in receiving these materials will not serve any constructive purpose." Both the House and Senate judiciary committees want the additional documents prior to interviewing the attorney general. He is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17.

According to Conyers, the DOJ has not released additional information regarding other US attorneys who the DOJ considered firing. These documents could help to shed light on the motivations of the Bush administration in its firing of the eight attorneys in question by revealing the criteria that the administration used to determine who stayed and who was asked to resign.

Additionally, the letter points to "an unspecified number of documents 'generated for the purpose of responding to the Congressional (and media) inquiries'" not yet turned over by DOJ. Conyers wants these documents in order to determine "whether Department officials ... attempted to obstruct our primary investigation or misled Congress."

Importantly, the subpoena requires electronic copies of messages and emails contained on hand-held email devices, as well as all relevant documents contained on laptop computers and servers. The subpoena also states that the DOJ is "required to produce all responsive documents that ... you have placed in the temporary possession, custody or control of any third party." This could include all email correspondence relating to the attorney firings that has been sent using private email addresses.

The use of private email addresses and non-White House servers has been revealed during this and other recent Congressional investigations. Representative Henry Waxman (D-California) documented correspondence between convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and Karl Rove's former aide Susan Ralston that purposely avoided official channels in order to bypass the mandatory archiving system for official White House emails.

In a separate letter on Monday, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) and Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-California) and Charles Schumer (D-New York) also requested documents from the DOJ that have not yet been disclosed. While much of their request overlaps with the information being subpoenaed by the House Judiciary Committee, they are looking at some additional factors as well.

The Senator's letter references an article in the American Spectator from April 2 which says that "a series of files and documents that could prove critical to the Congressional investigation into the firings ... remain in the office of the deputy attorney general and the executive office for the US attorneys, but have not been produced by the Department." These documents are reported to include evaluations and rankings of all 93 US attorneys, as well as relevant briefing materials known to have been provided to the attorney general prior to the investigation into these firings.

The Senate letter sets a deadline of Wednesday April 11 for full cooperation by the DOJ. The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Thursday to authorize subpoenas for this material. According to Democratic staffers, subpoenas will only be issued if the DOJ does not cooperate voluntarily.

In his letter to the attorney general, Congressman Conyers explained why subpoenas have become necessary: "Recent developments, including the apparent inconsistencies between your statements and the testimony of ... Kyle Sampson; declarations that your former senior counsel and White House liaison, Monica Goodling, intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination rather than answer the subcommittee's question; and a series of recent resignations by senior officials at the Department.... Under these circumstances, you must understand why we cannot accept the Department's unilateral judgment as to how much of this information it needs to disclose...."

*************

Matt Renner is a reporter for Truthout.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 


Julian Assange: A Thousand Days In Belmarsh
Julian Assange has now been in the maximum-security facilities of Belmarsh prison for over 1,000 days. On the occasion of his 1,000th day of imprisonment, campaigners, supporters and kindred spirits gathered to show their support, indignation and solidarity at this political detention most foul... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: The Mauling Of Novak Djokovic
Rarely can the treatment of a grand sporting figure by officialdom have caused such consternation. Novak Djokovic, the tennis World Number One, has always had a tendency to get under skin and constitution, creating a large following of admirers and detractors. But his current treatment by Australian authorities, and his subsequent detention as an unlawful arrival despite being granted a visa to participate in the Australian Open, had the hallmarks of oppression and incompetent vulgarity... More>>

Binoy Kampmark: Voices Of Concern: Aussies For Assange’s Return

With Julian Assange now fighting the next stage of efforts to extradite him to the United States to face 18 charges, 17 of which are based on the brutal, archaic Espionage Act, some Australian politicians have found their voice. It might be said that a few have even found their conscience... More>>



Forbidden Parties: Boris Johnson’s Law On Illegal Covid Gatherings

It was meant to be time to reflect. The eager arms of a new pandemic were enfolding a society with asphyxiating, lethal effect. Public health authorities advocated various measures: social distancing, limited contact between family and friends, limited mobility. No grand booze-ups. No large parties. No bonking, except within dispensations of intimacy and various “bubble” arrangements. Certainly, no orgies... More>>

Dunne Speaks: Question Time Is Anything But
The focus placed on the first couple of Question Time exchanges between the new leader of the National Party and the Prime Minister will have seemed excessive to many but the most seasoned Parliamentary observers. Most people, especially those outside the Wellington beltway, imagine Question Time is exactly what it sounds... More>>



Gasbagging In Glasgow: COP26 And Phasing Down Coal

Words can provide sharp traps, fettering language and caging definitions. They can also speak to freedom of action and permissiveness. At COP26, that permissiveness was all the more present in the haggling ahead of what would become the Glasgow Climate Pact... More>>